Thursday, August 6, 2009

Extreme Cinema - The Exorcist (1973)

The Exorcist, 1973.

Directed by William Friedkin.
Starring Ellen Burstyn, Max von Sydow, Jason Miller and Linda Blair.

The Exorcist Theatrical Poster
SYNOPSIS:

A desperate single mother is forced into hiring a priest to perform an exorcism on her possessed daughter.

The Exorcist
The Exorcist was made by former documentary maker William Friedkin who had then recently won an Oscar for The French Connection (1971). The film was based on a real life possession involving a young boy in 1949. In the film it would be a young girl (Linda Blair) who is possessed by a demon, prompting her single mother to seek help from two priests to perform an exorcism.

In 1971, the BBFC cut a sequence out of Ken Russell’s The Devils (1971) which featured a group of nuns raping a statue of Christ. Although retiring censor John Trevelyan liked the film he conceded further cuts suggested by members of the BBFC. These included scenes of nudity, masturbation, orgies and a fantasy sequence in which the priest Grandier (Oliver Reed) came down from a cross to make love to Sister Jeanne (Vanessa Redgrave). Despite the awarding of an X certificate and further excisions made to avoid a religious backlash, the film was seen as blasphemous by the Nationwide Festival of Light, a religious organization who succeeded in getting the film banned by several local authorities. By 1974, censor Stephen Murphy had passed The Exorcist (1973) uncut but its religious subject matter caused further consternation and resulted in its screenings being picketed by the Festival of Light who linked the film to the suicide of a teenage boy.

The film was passed uncut onto video in 1980 but was later withdrawn in 1986 after the introduction of the Video Recordings Act which stipulated that a film was liable if it caused potential harm to viewers. Due to media attacks and much negative correspondence the BBFC had received at the time of the film’s release, a video certificate was deemed irresponsible. Censor James Ferman would refuse the film a certificate again in 1988. This would continue for many years with Ferman arguing that video films were more accessible to children and that the film’s protagonist was a 12 year old girl which would prompt children’s interest in the film. Ferman was also concerned about the response from religious groups especially those who believed in demonic possession.

When Ferman retired from the board in 1998, his successor Robin Duval passed the film uncut the following year. Duval reasoned that many social and cultural changes had occurred since the film’s original release and that many children would be familiar with much stronger material. This also came at a time when the board had acquired a new president in Andreas Whittam Smith who was promoting a more lenient BBFC.

The Exorcist has surprisingly managed to retain much of its power, with director Friedkin’s documentary style giving the film an authentic feel. The cast are uniformly excellent especially the mother (Ellen Burstyn) whose breakdowns are very convincing as she struggles to cope with this supernatural occurrence. The scene where the possessed girl masturbates with a crucifix with blood pouring from her crotch is still strong even by today’s standards. Whilst some of the special effects have dated, some of the more subtle scenes are still very effective. These include a sequence in a church where a priest notices one of the statues is grotesquely deformed and the now reinstated scene in which the possessed girl descends a flight of stairs like a spider.

It is still confusing however as to why the film has caused so much controversy as it does flaunt a very strong pro-religion message. The girl is made to do evil things by the malevolent spirit that has possessed her, forcing her to shout obscenities and harm herself. In the film, doctors and psychiatrists are unable to help the girl so her atheist mother consults a doubting priest to perform an exorcism. He in turn joins forces with a much older and experienced priest and both die saving the girl. The final scene in which the liberated girl looks up at a priest and kisses him on the cheek as if to say thank you is a very poignant conclusion to the film.

Santosh Sandhu graduated with a Masters degree in film from the University of Bedfordshire and wrote the short film 'The Volunteers'.

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

The Firm - New Full-Length Trailer Released

New trailer for Nick Love's latest... Nick Love The Firm

On September 18th British writer-director Nick Love releases his fifth feature film The Firm, a loose adaptation of Alan Clarke's classic 1989 TV movie starring Gary Oldman.

Love's film takes place earlier in the 80s and retells the story from a different point of view with Dom, a young wannabe football casual, drawn into the charismatic but dangerous world of the firm's top boy, Bex.

Be sure to check out the new trailer below (along with the teaser which you can also find here), or visit the official site for more.

Lean Times: A David Lean Profile (Part 1)

Trevor Hogg profiles the career of acclaimed filmmaker Sir David Lean in the first of a three-part feature...

Even as the Germans bombed London during WWII, the British film industry soldiered on, allowing a new directorial talent to emerge - David Lean.

Overshadowed by an academically smarter younger brother, the floundering eighteen year old found his true calling when he bought a Pathé-Baby 9.5 m.m. camera. With the aid of the contacts of his accountant father, David Lean was able to get an apprenticeship at Gaumont Studios. Once there, the trainee made an unexpected discovery. “I was knocked backwards,” recalled Lean, who used to watch directors assemble their raw footage into a movie, “by the effect one could get by cutting from a long shot to a close-up, or a close-up of a woman intercut with a close-up of a man. It all seemed so real, much better than it seemed in the studio when we shot it.” From that moment on, the eager camera assistant spent what time he could in the cutting room and his persistence paid off; a major blunder by a newsreel editor enabled him to then move into the vacated position.

Because of David Lean’s editing ingenuity, the Gaumont Studio’s departing News Editor took his protégé with him to British Movietone News. No sooner than he had arrived than the new hire was loaned out to cut his first feature length picture entitled These Charming People (1931). The rookie approached his assignment as if it was a newsreel, which did not go over well with the producers of the movie. “I had vastly overcut it,” confessed the acclaimed filmmaker. “It jumped all over the place. It was abominable.” Consequently, he found himself subjected to a demotion.

Fortunately, Lean’s reputation was not permanently damaged; a colleague’s recommendation led him to work in Paris on the Foreign Legion melodrama Insult (1932). “After awhile I became a sort of film doctor,” he revealed. “If they had a film that was much too long, or a film they were in trouble with, I used to come in and re-cut it.” In further reference to his days as a British movie editor, the Academy Award winning director remarked, “I worked on a lot of bad pictures, and bad pictures are very good for one’s ego, because the worse they are, the more chance you have of making them better. And I started to think, as numerous people who work with me think, that I could do better than they could – and that gave me a real urge to do something in the way of direction.” The wish to become a director would be fulfilled by a theatrical legend.

“This is Noël Coward.” said the distinguished voice on the other end of the line. “I wish to speak to David Lean.” As a result of that phone call, Lean went on to receive his first co-directorial credit working alongside the famous English actor and playwright. In Which We Serve, released in 1941, was inspired by the sinking of the H.M.S. Kelly off the coast of Crete in May of the same year. The first draft was written for a six to eight hour seafaring epic. To rectify the situation, Lean suggested Coward see a recent motion picture called Citizen Kane. Impressed by Orsen Welles’s dramatic utilization of flashbacks, the playwright cutup the narrative of the WWII tale and used the men clinging to the Carley float to move from one section of the movie to another. On the film’s set, the responsibilities were split in half with the actors being handled by Noël Coward and the camera setups by David Lean. Even with the support of Lord Mountbatten, finding a distributor for the war propaganda film proved to be difficult. Ironically, after the movie was publicly screened several of its cast members - John Mills, Richard Attenborough, Bernard Miles, Kay Walsh, Celia Johnson, and Michael Wilding went on to become stars.

Delighted with the commercial success of In Which We Serve, Coward wanted his co-director, and cinematographer Ronald Neame to adapt all of his stage plays into films. To handle the request, a business partnership was established between Lean, Neame and producer Anthony Havelock-Allen in the form of Cineguild. The first feature length production for the movie enterprise occurred in 1944, with David Lean situated alone in the director’s chair. “It’s awfully hard doing a stage play, it really is,” remarked Lean. “You’ve got to bring in so many ideas to make it a screenplay. A film demands an intimate look at the scene which cannot be done on the stage.”

This Happy Breed was a small scale play written by Noël Coward spanning several decades in the life of an ordinary British family. A couple of controversial decisions where made by Lean. “When I first wanted to do the picture in colour, everybody thought it was disgraceful. I had all the highbrows at Denham [Studios] saying, ‘Why on earth are you doing it in colour?’ I said Why not? It’s new and it excites me.” The other was not to cast Coward as the family’s patriarch, a role he had performed on the stage. David Lean explained his reason for choosing Robert Newton rather than the story’s originator. “Noël used to think nothing of his writing ability and nothing of his ability to compose music. What he loved and yearned for above anything else was praise as an actor. And quite, honestly, I don’t think he was a terribly good actor unless he came out with a cigarette-holder and a dressing gown.” This Happy Breed went on to become Britain’s top moneymaking film for 1944.

A year later, despite the lingering resentment over the casting snub, Noël Coward was not deterred from working with his director again. Initially, however, Lean was reluctant to make Blithe Spirit his sophomore effort. “I said to Noël, I’m not ready to do this sort of stuff. I know nothing about comedy, especially high comedy. And with this you haven’t a yardstick with which to compare it.” He also had reservations about the supernatural elements found in the tale. “It’s completely unreal. A ghost of a dead wife in the house, the present wife can’t hear her, the husband can and he talks to her – I don’t know how to handle it.” When told this, the undaunted playwright responded, “Nonsense, my dear. Of course you can.” Unfortunately, audiences disagreed with Coward causing the movie to be a commercial failure. One consolation was that Blithe Spirit did win an Academy Award for special effects.

Also released in 1945, was the third cinematic feature directed by David Lean, which would later inspire the Billy Wilder classic The Apartment (1960). The first draft entitled Still Life took Noël Coward ten days to write, but major revisions were required. “I read it and said, Noël, I don’t think it’s any good.” reiterated Lean. “This woman arrives at a railway station and gets some soot in her eye, meets this man and they arrange to meet the next Thursday and it goes on and in the end they part. It’s got no surprises in it. It’s not intriguing. You’re not saying to the audience, watch carefully this is interesting.” When pressed by Coward to give him an example, the British filmmaker responded. “We start with a fairly busy waiting-room. There are two people sitting at a table talking, a man and a woman. Through the door comes another woman who sits down at the table. As she sits talking and talking, you realize there’s something not quite right going on and a train comes into the station. ‘That’s your train,’ says the woman. ‘Yes,” says the man, ‘I must go. Goodbye.’ He shakes hands with the other woman and then you go back and explain that this is the last time they see each other. And you play the first scene in the picture – it made no sense to you at all and you didn’t hear half the dialogue – again, and that’s the end of the film, with an added piece perhaps with the husband. He [Coward] said, ‘Say no more,’ and off he went for about four days, and he came back with what was essentially Brief Encounter.”

David Lean did not expect the movie, which made him a public figure and provided him with his first of eight Oscar nominations for Best Director, to become profitable. “We defied all the rules of box office success,” he marveled. “There were no big star names. There was an unhappy ending to the main love story. The film was played in unglamorous surroundings. And the three leading characters were approaching middle age. A few years ago this would have been a recipe for box office disaster, but this wasn’t the case with Brief Encounter. The film did very well in this country [Britain] in what are known as ‘the better-class halls’ and [it had] a similar success but on a smaller scale, in New York.”

Of all the cinematic adaptations of Charles Dickens’s Great Expectations, the most revered continues to be the British director’s 1946 version. After reading a dreadful script written by a Dickensian expert, David Lean decided to take matters into his own hands. “As I read the book for the umpteeth time,” he declared, ”I wrote down in a sort of headline form those scenes, or parts of scenes, which I thought would make a good movie, and I left out anything I thought dull.” The idea was a good one though there was a major problem that needed to be addressed – the lack of continuity. “Then we sat down and tried to link the episodes and fill in the gaps.” stated Lean. “That’s how it worked, and it worked rather well. What we did, we did proud, if we had a Dickens scene, we gave it full value.”

With regards to selecting his cast, Lean reunited with John Mills who played Pip; for Herbert Pocket he chose a young actor who would go on to star in another five of his films – Alec Guinness. He was so impressed by Guinness’s stage presentation of Great Expectations that it convinced the director to film the literary masterpiece. Shortly after the movie was released Lean said, “What we were trying to do was to create that larger-than-life picture which is really most characteristic of Dickens’ kind of writing. The scenes of the boy, Pip, lying terrified in his bedroom after a night of fear, creeping downstairs at dawn and then stealing the food for the convict out on the marshes was something Dickens wrote as if he were inside the boy himself. We tried to make the audience share Pip’s fear. If we hadn’t done this, we should have been faced with quite a different problem – making the audience accept what is really a pretty exaggerated piece of melodrama.”

The overwhelmingly positive reception by critics and moviegoers resulted in the film winning Oscars for Best Black and White Art and Set Decoration, and Best Black and White Cinematography; as well, it was nominated for Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Adapted Screenplay.

Noël Coward once gave David Lean some career guidance when he declared. “My dear, never come out of the same hole twice.” The director ignored the sage advice in 1948 when he produced another Dickens classic. “All I could think of,” Lean explained, “because I had read it and thought it would make a jolly good movie, was Oliver Twist.” The movie’s production manager, Norman Spencer, in making reference to the cinematic inclinations of Lean remarked, “David used to regard the audience as a friendly enemy. He used to say, ‘I’d love to make a film in which there’s no dialogue for at least the first quarter of an hour. I want to see the chap in the audience with a cigarette – he can’t bring himself to light it because he’s so gripped.’” Spence went on to add, “He always tried to start his picture without dialogue, and Oliver Twist is a marvelous example of that. It really works one hundred percent.”

To get himself chosen for the role of the villainous Fagin, Alec Guinness transformed himself during a makeup test. When he walked onto the set Guinness gave his director quite the shock. “He came on looking not far removed from what he looks like in the film,” recalled Lean. “Of course I was bowled over by it and he got the part without another word.” As for the title character, an appeal went out for boys between the ages of twelve and fifteen; there were over fifteen hundred applications. The final choice of John Howard Davies happened by accident; his father used to work with Lean as a writer when the filmmaker was a newsreel editor.

“I am not mad about violence on the screen,” stated Lean. He went on to explain his innovated approach in showing the killing of Nancy and the aftermath of her murder. “To do the death of Nancy as described – Bill Sikes hitting her on the head – would be disgusting. So I thought of the idea of the dog bolting for the door when Sikes picks up the cudgel. That’s not in the book, but it worked like a treat – the dog trying to get out, with the cries and bangs laid over it, and much more frightening than showing it because the audiences fill in the gaps they haven’t seen.”

Even with the growing controversy surrounding Alec Guinness’s portrayal of Fagan as being “the worst caricature of a Jew ever depicted in an English-language film”, Oliver Twist went on to be nominated for Best British Film at the inaugural BAFTAS. After he returned from a much needed holiday, David Lean found more trouble waiting for him in the form of his next project, The Passionate Friends.


Read part two and part three right here.

Trevor Hogg is a freelance video editor and writer who currently resides in Canada.

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Uk Box Office Top Ten - weekend commencing 31/07/09

UK box office top ten and analysis for the weekend of Friday 31st July - Sunday 2nd August 2009.

The U.K. chart enjoyed a healthy shake-up with five new releases debuting in the top ten this past weekend but Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince continues to dominate after three weeks on release. Having banked over £40m so far, the sixth installment in the popular wizarding franchise is the clear front-runner for the highest grossing film of the year and should also crack the all-time U.K. top ten in the next week or two.

Two new entries - 3D gerbil action comedy G-Force and crime thriller remake The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 - opened in second and third respectively, pushing last week’s second-placed picture The Proposal down two places to fourth. Also dropping two places to fifth is the animated hit Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs, which now stands just short of £30m in receipts after five weeks on U.K. screens but seems to have lost a big chunk of the 3D market to G-Force.

Three other new releases occupy spaces in the bottom half of the chart - Will Ferrell comedy adventure Land of the Lost (in sixth place with £643k, giving Ferrell his lowest opening since 2006’s Stranger Than Fiction), French biopic Coco Before Chanel (in ninth with £423k), and Bollywood release Love Aaj Kal (in tenth, but with the highest screen average of the weekend after collecting £406k from just 52 screens).

Meanwhile, hit comedies Bruno and The Hangover both managed to cling on to spots in the chart despite falling three places apiece, but there was no room for Antichrist, Moon, My Sister’s Keeper, Public Enemies, and Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, all of which disappeared as a result of the new releases.

















































































Pos.FilmWeekend GrossWeekTotal UK Gross
1Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
£2,917,7863











£40,537,578
2G-Force
£2,478,5241

















£2,478,524
3The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3
£1,784,7191





















£1,784,719
4The Proposal
£1,489,2682



















£6,886,749
5Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs£1,143,2115



















£29,154,739
6Land of the Lost
£642,5531



















£642,553
7Bruno£612,5774



















£14,729,716
8The Hangover
£517,8958

























£20,603,489
9Coco Before Chanel
£423,2681





















£423,268
10Love Aaj Kal£405,6731

























£405,673


Incoming...

Paramount and Hasbro release their second live-action big screen adaptation this coming Friday with the Stephen Sommers directed G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra. Rather surprisingly the film has generated quite a few positive reviews and will look to challenge Harry Potter for the prestigious top spot in the chart.

Also released is romantic comedy The Ugly Truth, starring Katherine Heigl and Gerard Butler, alongside thriller The Orphan and Irish drama W.C.

U.K. Box Office Archive

Monday, August 3, 2009

Thoughts on... Hannah Montana: The Movie (2009)

Hannah Montana: The Movie, 2009.

Directed by Peter Chelsom.
Starring Miley Cyrus and Billy Ray Cyrus.


SYNOPSIS:


The world famous singer is forced to return to her hometown in order to rediscover her roots.


I’m sticking my neck on the line here because I am offering Hannah Montana: The Movie to you, the cinephiles of the world, as a prime example of a classic; not of quality but of complete and utter nonsense which makes you want to vomit. It is a movie which sees you yearning to tear each and every copy into small pieces using the sharp edges of a shaving razor, then pouring gasoline onto said pieces and shoving it down the movie’s producers mouths just to show to them what an abomination they have unleashed onto the world. Heck, I would go as far as to blacklist those who greenlighted this for production. The poor souls of the McCarthy witch-hunts never put a foot wrong, but here the producers have.

The premise of the ‘film’ is laughable; a famous singer named Miley Cyrus is tricked into leaving her affluent existence and heading back to a country farm which looks much more appealing than any skyscraper. After all, this is a Disney film and any film made by this once-great company could make a Bernard Madoff investment look enticing to your average Joe. Upon arriving at said farm she walks into her grandmothers’ house and, who should appear, but the country music band Rascall Flatts. As anybody knows, Rascall Flatts has this tendency to arrive unannounced at regular people’s houses (it’s their thing you see). Fast forward to the evening, and Miley sees herself attending a barn dance in aid of rescuing the town. And, gosh darn it, who is playing there but another famous country singer named Taylor Swift. Is this a vehicle for other teeny bop music? Of course not. They just turned up, and weren’t hired for millions of dollars to appear for the most fleeting of moments. Then, because she mentioned she could sing, Miley is ushered to sing some horrendous R & B track. And, this being Disney everyone, down to the frail old grandma on her last legs, has the strength to break some moves. After all, everyone loves R & B music. I do, but only the same way I love my leg being amputated or eating a batch of black widow spiders. I admit I am digressing.

Roll on to after Miley’s ‘singing’ and the bad guy of the piece appears; the stereotypical Englishman who wants to ruin it for everyone else by finding out the truth about Hannah Montana (why anyone would want to do such a thing puzzles me). Accompanied by the guy who wants to tear down the town they are in than you have a shit full of bad guys on your hands. The rest of the film was a blur to me as I was trying to eat my own head to avoid seeing what would happen next, but what I understand is that a happy ending prevails. Bless.

Like the bubonic plague, this film is one you want to avoid but if you want to see a cinematic car crash at work than by all means part with a couple of dollars for a copy of it. But, then again, you could buy yourself some pliers and pull out your eyes so that you could avoid seeing this film. I prefer the pliers.

How the heck does this type of nonsense keep getting made? When I was a boy, I had classics from Disney such as Pinocchio to watch on my trusty VHS player. Now, the VHS player is no more and movies like Pinocchio are sadly not around. In fifty years time, around the same period I myself saw Pinocchio after it was first released, children might look back on this movie and see it as a classic. That thought petrifies me, as if movies like this are regarded with such love than something is going wrong. C’mon Disney, get your act together. If for anybody, at least for the children. You owe it to them after releasing a ‘movie’ like this.

Russell Hill

Sunday, August 2, 2009

Five Essential... Stephen King Adaptations

Gary Collinson selects his Five Essential Stephen King adaptations…

Acclaimed writer Stephen King is one of the best-selling authors of all time and his stories have served as inspiration for countless theatrical features, TV movies and miniseries. While his words may well be his power, adaptations of said words often leave much to be desired. However, among a considerable number of sub-standard, low-budget and poorly-executed titles are a selection of true classics that serve to illustrate King’s unique storytelling ability…

5. The Green Mile (1999, dir. Frank Darabont)

Frank Darabont’s second Stephen King adaptation - based upon the serial novel that King released in six parts through-out 1996 - The Green Mile stars Tom Hanks as Paul Edgecomb, supervisor of the death row wing of Cold Mountain Penitentiary during the early 1930’s. Told through flashbacks with the elderly Edgecomb serving as narrator, the film recounts the tale of John Coffey (Michael Clarke Duncan), a convicted (albeit innocent) child-killer and ‘gentle-giant’, who also happens to possess a supernatural healing ability. Despite a runtime in excess of three hours, The Green Mile is a captivating and highly moving film that includes superb performances from its cast and masterful direction from Darabont.



4. Misery (1990, dir. Rob Reiner)

James Caan star as Paul Sheldon, famous author and creator of the Misery Chastain series, who is nursed back to health after a car accident by ‘number one fan’ Annie Wilkes (Kathy Burke, in an Academy Award and Golden Globe winning performance). After learning that Paul plans to kill off the Misery character in his latest book, Annie snaps and keeps the novelist captive while forcing him to burn the manuscript and start anew. Rob Reiner’s second foray into King territory is much darker than his first and builds to a thrilling and horrific climax, while both Bates and Caan are exceptional in their roles.




3. Stand By Me (1986, dir. Rob Reiner)

With King firmly established as a horror writer by the early 80s, the 1982 collection Different Seasons showcased his ability to shift from the genre and Rob Reiner’s 1986 adaptation of The Body delivered one of the most memorable movies of the decade. Narrated by writer Gordie LaChance (Richard Dreyfuss), Stand By Me recounts a life-changing experience from his childhood, where young Gordie (Wil Wheaton) and his friends Chris (River Phoenix), Teddy (Corey Feldman) and Vern (Jerry O’Connell) had set out on an adventure to find the missing body of a local boy. Stand By Me has proven to be a timeless film with its themes of friendship and youthful innocence, and one to which almost everyone can relate.



2. The Shawshank Redemption (1994, dir. Frank Darabont)

The second film on this list to be directed by Frank Darabont (and the second to be adapted from Different Seasons) The Shawshank Redemption stars Tim Robbins as Andy Dufresne, a banker who spends almost two decades in Shawshank State Penitentiary after he is wrongly accused of murdering his wife and her lover. Andy becomes acquainted with another inmate Red (Morgan Freeman), and the two strike up a lasting friendship amidst the harsh brutalities of prison life. Dealing with themes of hope, redemption and faith, The Shawshank Redemption is an inspirational film and its popularity has increased immensely over time, with the movie currently sitting atop the IMDb’s 250 Greatest Films of All Time.


1. The Shining (1980, dir. Stanley Kubrick)

Stanley Kubrick’s horror masterpiece initially opened to mixed reviews, Golden Raspberry nominations and criticism towards the changes made to the source novel, while King himself described the film ‘dreadfully upsetting’. As with The Shawshank Redemption, The Shining’s popularity and status have enjoyed spectacular growth in the years following release and it now stands as one of the finest examples of its genre. A gripping and iconic film with Jack Nicholson thoroughly convincing in the role of Jack Torrance, caretaker of the isolated Overlook Hotel, who descends into madness as a result of the hotel’s supernatural inhabitants and is urged to murder his wife Wendy (Shelley Duvall) and psychic son Danny (Danny Lloyd).

Jack Torrance meets Delbert Grady:


Honourable Mentions…

Carrie (1976, dir. Brian De Palma)
The Dead Zone (1983, dir. David Cronenberg)
The Running Man (1987, dir. Paul Michael Glaser)
Apt Pupil (1998, dir. Bryan Singer)
The Mist (2007, dir. Frank Darabont)

While on the small-screen, Salem’s Lot (1979) and It (1990) are fine examples that manage to retain much of their impact after all these years.

Agree? Disagree? We'd love to hear your comments on the list...

Gary Collinson

Essentials Archive

Saturday, August 1, 2009

Movies... For Free! Horror Express (1973)

Welcome to this week's "Movies... For Free!" column, where we showcase classic movies freely available in the public domain (with streaming video!). Read the article and watch the movie right here!


Horror Express, 1973.

Directed by Eugenio Martin.
Starring Christopher Lee, Peter Cushing and Telly Savalas.

Horror Express is a low budget Spanish production that reunited the celebrated 'Hammer Horror' duo of Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing, while director Eugenio Martin reused the sets from his previous effort Pancho Villa (1972) along with star Telly Savalas, whose appearance in this picture comes hot on the heels of his debut as Kojak in the American television series.

Anthropologist Professor Saxton (Lee) has discovered what he believes to be the 'Missing Link' frozen in Manchuria, and he and associate Dr. Wells (Cushing) board a train bound for Europe with the fossilised creature stored in a crate. A number of brutal murders soon occur and when the creature is found to be responsible it is destroyed. However they soon discover that the fossil was inhabited by an alien entity that possesses the ability to shift between bodies, and the two set about to rescue the remaining passengers with the aid of Captain Kazan (Savalas) and his small band of Cossacks.

Like many European productions of the time, Horror Express was mostly shot without sound and dialogue recorded for the various different markets in post-production (with Lee, Cushing and Savalas all providing their own voices for this English version). While the film failed disappointed at the Spanish box office it did prove successful in the U.K., and has since achieved a cult following due to repeated television broadcasts throughout the 1970s and 80s.



Embeds courtesy of Internet Archive.

Related:

The City of the Dead a.k.a Horror Hotel (1960)


Click here to view all previous entries in our Movies... For Free! collection.