Saturday, September 5, 2009

I Sat Through That? #9 - The Lord of the Rings Trilogy

In which Gerry Hayes stares down the flaming maw of the fanboys and bellows “You shall not pass!”

The Lord of the Rings Trilogy, 2001-2003.

Lord of the Rings trilogy
Time to incur the wrath of the Tolkienites. I’ll have hordes of them sending death-threats in beautifully penned but barely decipherable variants of Elvish. They’ll swarm, costumed as Middle-Earth heroes and hobgoblins, around my house and set up sophisticated facsimiles of the Shire in which to camp. The hippy fans will get stoned and play guitar while the geek fans will politely ask if they can plug in an extension cable through my window so they can run their Wiis before calling me a loser, throwing an egg at me and missing. Then they’ll continue work on their Sindarin/Quenya/l33t dictionary. Whenever I leave the house, the ones dressed as Orcs will rage at me in cockney accents and I’ll be able to make out a few badly-adapted Klingon costumes in their number.

I care not though, for it must be stated: Lord Of The Rings is pants.

There. I’ve said it. Do your worst.

Now, while I may have been kidding a little on the geek thing (for I am something of a geek myself, only cooler and I’ve kissed an actual girl), I’m not kidding about Lord Of The Rings.

Before we start, it’s time for a full disclosure. I was taken in. I actually own all three films on DVD. The special editions, too. I am deeply ashamed of this and, to atone, I flagellate myself nightly while watching Lawrence of Arabia. Or porn. Mostly porn. But I digress. I went to the cinema to see all three and I watched the first two, extra-long, on DVD. By the time the third DVD arrived, the scales had been lifted and it sits, unwatched in its massive gatefold case.

They were beautifully filmed, you see. The cinematography was astonishing. The direction was good. The acting was ok in most places. Technically, and visually, the special effects were amazing.

So what’s the problem?

The story. It’s just tedious, turgid, tosh.

Hobbits and elves and dwarves and orcs and uruk-hai and humans and dragon-things and rock-things and humans and a big eye on a tower and wizards and oh, Christ, my will to live is draining, draining, inexorably draining away.

I know what you’re thinking. You’re thinking, “What gives, Hayes? You’re supposed to be slagging off films, not the immense, dreary novels on which they’re based.”

Indeed.

However, the books are the source material. Even though they seem well adapted (I say ‘seem’ as I stopped reading the first book when the willow tree bored the Hobbits to sleep and Tom ‘Jar Jar’ Bombadil had to sing to the tree to save them), they still tell the same interminable story. I feel justified in bad-mouthing the films because they stuck so well to the source.

Can Peter Jackson be blamed for this? Sort of. It was his bloody idea. Ok, so he makes it all look nice but, you know, lipstick on a pig and all that. Apparently, Jackson originally planned to make two movies (one of the things I learned from the mountain of DVD extras) but, bizarrely, some guy in the studio thought that a movie per book would be the way to go. On the face of it, this is a fantastic idea; a studio actually wanting to do something right, to be faithful to the books. Brilliant. Except they decided to do it with these books and we’ve ended up with ten-odd hours of beautiful dishwater.

And I bought them. I’m as guilty as anyone.

You all know the story. Short blokes with big feet have evil ring. Have to throw it in a volcano that’s miles away. They get in scrapes along the way and meet many fantastical creatures and whatnot. Blah, blah, swords, arrows, horses, hairy-feet, Smeagol, nasty hobbitses, grumpy trees, Christopher Lee, big bird, big spider. Repeat for ten hours. The end.

I’d hazard that Peter Jackson owes me (hang on... first two twice and last one once, plus extended bits, plus extras, carry the one...) at least twenty hours of my life back. That’s nearly a day! I know a number of people like me too - disillusioned people who bought into this white-elephantine trilogy - who also want those hours back. What about it, Jackson?

Predictably, however, I also know people - more than a few - who count these among their favourite films. You could argue that it’s not a matter of right and wrong; that these things are subjective and those people who think these films are better than any others are just as right as I.

You could argue that, but you’d be just as wrong as they are.

Incidentally, does anyone want to buy all three in special, extended, DVD editions? The third one’s never been played?

Read more I Sat Through That? right here.

Gerry Hayes is a garret-dwelling writer subsisting on tea, beer and Flame-Grilled Steak flavour McCoy’s crisps. You can read about other stuff he doesn't like on his blog at http://stareintospace.com or you can have easy, bite-sized bits of him at http://twitter.com/gerryhayes

British World War II Giveaway Results...

The lucky recipients are...


We've been running a giveaway these past few weeks to get rid of a few duplicates of those fantastic Daily Mail War Movie Collection DVD’s from a while back, and the results are now in. The lucky recipients are...

They Who Dare (1954, dir. Lewis Milestone)

K. Honey, Winchester
H. Caldwell, Ballymena

The Dam Busters (1955, dir. Michael Anderson)

G. Earls, Cornwall
C. Woods, Norwich

Sea of Sand (1958, dir. Guy Green)

A Tinkler, Doncaster
B. Raynor, Havant

Thanks to everyone who entered the giveaway, and check back soon for future competitions!

Away We Go - new website and musical memory map!

On September 18th Academy Award winning British director Sam Mendes (American Beauty, Revolutionary Road) returns to UK cinemas with his latest film Away We Go, starring John Krasinski (The Office: An American Workplace), Maya Rudolph (Shrek The Third) Jeff Daniels (Good Night and Good Luck) and Maggie Gyllenhaal (The Dark Knight).



To help promote the film - and taking inspiration from its theme and soundtrack - distributor E1 Entertainment have teamed up with We7, a free and legal music streaming website, to offer a fun and engaging way to share musical memories online (screenshot to the right). The featured online application gives you the opportunity to relive your musical memories; simply head over to the site, select your song from the We7 library and tie it in to a location on the interactive UK map.



Away We Go is a funny and heartfelt contemporary comedy written by Dave Eggers and Vendela Vida and follows the journey of an expectant couple as they travel the U.S. in search of the perfect place to put down roots and raise their family. Along the way, they have misadventures and find fresh connections with an assortment of relatives and old friends who just might help them discover “home” on their own terms for the first time. Featuring the music of Alexi Murdoch.



Away We Go trailer:



Thursday, September 3, 2009

Bringing Star Wars to the Screen: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back

In the second part of a series of articles examining the various screen incarnations of George Lucas’ Star Wars saga, we focus on the Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back…

Star Wars: Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back, 1980.

Directed by Irvin Kershner.
Starring Mark Hamill, Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, Billy Dee Williams and Anthony Daniels.

The Empire Strikes Back poster
SYNOPSIS:

Three years after the destruction of the Death Star the Rebel Alliance have sought refuge on the remote ice-planet of Hoth but they are soon scattered across the galaxy after the Empire launches a full-scale assault. Luke Skywalker seeks out the revered Jedi Master Yoda to continue his training while Darth Vader relentlessly pursues Princess Leia, Han Solo, Chewbacca and C3PO aboard Millennium Falcon. Capturing the heroes, Vader then uses them as bait to lure Skywalker into a confrontation that ends with a shocking revelation.

Luke vs Vader Empire Strikes Back
Given the unprecedented success of George Lucas’ 1977 space opera Star Wars it was inevitable that a sequel would soon follow. While he felt at the time that Star Wars would be his last picture as a director due to the exhaustive nature of the production, Lucas was keen to further explore his newly created galaxy and had been reflecting upon his original vision, which would have spanned a number of movies and concluded with the Rebel’s destroying the Death Star (fearing that Star Wars would prove unpopular and fail to generate a sequel, he instead chose to use this as the climax of the original movie). Aware of audience demand for more – and conscious of the fact that his original deal with Fox stated that any sequel must be in production within two years to avoid the rights reverting back to the studio – Lucas opted to independently produce the next instalment and serve as executive producer, which enabled him to supervise the production whilst contributing to other Lucasfilm projects, namely More American Graffiti (1979) and Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981).

Lucas viewed the sequel as “the middle act of a three-act play” and after producing a story treatment he contracted screenwriter Leigh Brackett to turn his outline into a workable script. Brackett completed her first draft early in 1978 but unfortunately died of cancer just days after delivering the screenplay. Lucas then decided to complete this himself (albeit uncredited) along with help from Lawrence Kasdan, who had recently finished the first draft of Raiders. Kasdan worked on revising Brackett’s draft throughout 1978 while Lucas continued pre-production. Independent filmmaker and Lucas’ former USC teacher Irvin Kershner was hired to handle the pressures of direction, with Lucas retaining overall control on each aspect of production from his executive producer position.

Most of the original crew were also reunited save for director of photography Gilbert Taylor (who had clashed with Lucas during the first movie and was subsequently replaced by Peter Suschitzky) and production designer John Barry (Barry had accepted an offer to direct the 1980 science fiction film Saturn 3, but was fired during production and returned as second unit director on Empire only to die of meningitis two weeks into filming).The principal actors from Star Wars all agreed to return, while Billy Dee Williams was brought in for the role of Lando Calrissian (Williams had initially auditioned for the part of Han Solo back in 1976 and became the only black character to appear in the original trilogy).

In addition to the returning cast and crew, Lucasfilm once again hired London’s Elstree Studios (although they were forced to construct a new soundstage on the studio backlot to house the giant Dagobah set), while Finise in Norway was selected to stand in for the frozen wastelands of Hoth. Principal photography on The Empire Strikes Back began in Norway on March 5th 1979 and - as with Star Wars - location filming was severely hampered by bad weather conditions with the crew battling freezing temperatures, snowdrifts and blizzards to capture footage for the early Hoth portion of the film. Moving to London, the production found Elstree Studios to be temporarily unavailable (Stanley Kubrick was using the facility for his Stephen King adaptation The Shining, which had fallen behind schedule), and had to make do with nearby Lee International Studios until space became available.

Worried that the production was falling apart Lucas soon flew to London to try and salvage the situation. He hired American director Harley Cokeliss and was soon running multiple units simultaneously, with Lucas himself helming a number of scenes which he felt had been mishandled. Empire’s budget had now spiralled out of control and Lucas was forced to negotiate a deal with the First National Bank of Boston to provide additional funds, which were supplied only on the proviso that Fox guaranteed the loan (in return Fox were given a greater percentage of profits on both Empire and Return of the Jedi). Shooting eventually wrapped in September, having taken 175 days as opposed to the scheduled 100, and burning a $33 million hole in Lucas’ pocket.

The Empire Strikes Back was released to an eager public on May 21st, 1980 (queues at Mann’s Egyptian Theater in Hollywood had begun three days earlier, marking the beginning of the oft-repeated fan tradition), banking over $10m in its first weekend and going on to become the biggest grossing film of the year, with Lucas turning a profit within three months. Although today the film is often considered the best of the saga, initial critical reaction was somewhat mixed with a number of reviews pointing to the second-act nature of the narrative and lack of plot. However, most were in agreement that the marked departure towards more adult-orientated themes helped the film to stand out from its predecessor and position itself as a worthy (and necessary) sequel.

Indeed, Empire really does go out of its way to avoid retreading Star Wars (the only location that appears in both movies is the interior of the Millennium Falcon), enhancing and adding to the story with the introduction of classic characters such as Jedi Master Yoda, the bounty hunter Boba Fett, and of course the Emperor himself. It goes as far as to invert the earlier narrative, beginning as it does with the big battle (only this time, with the Imperials gaining the victory) and slowing considerably until the climax, at which point the Rebel Alliance is on the verge of oblivion and all hope seemingly lost. The role of fan favourite Darth Vader is also expanded considerably in this second chapter and the Dark Lord is on ruthless form throughout, while his startling paternal revelation to Luke Skywalker masterfully raises the stakes and paves the way for the concluding episode of the saga.

In his 1997 review, respected film critic Roger Ebert described The Empire Strikes Back as “the best of the three Star Wars films, and the most thought-provoking”, and with the movie currently ranked number 10 on the IMDB Top 250 (two places above the 1977 original), it would seem that fans are generally in agreement. It is also testament to the quality of The Empire Strikes Back that, during the 1997 special edition releases of the original trilogy, it was the episode to which the least alterations were made. Unlike Star Wars, which had benefitted from a number of visual effects overhauls, additional scenes such as Han’s confrontation with Jabba the Hutt and of course, the Han – Greedo controversy, enhancements to Empire were minimal (a revised Wampa, visual tweaks to flesh out the Bespin landscape, and a short scene of Vader leaving Cloud City are the main changes, while the 2004 DVD release would see Ian McDiarmid reprise his role as the Emperor at the expense of Clive Revill).

Bringing Star Wars to the Screen: Episode IV – A New Hope
Bringing Star Wars to the Screen: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi
Bringing Star Wars to the Small Screen: The Star Wars Holiday Special
Bringing Star Wars to the Small Screen: Caravan of Courage - An Ewok Adventure
Bringing Star Wars to the Small Screen: Ewoks - Battle For Endor
Bringing Star Wars to the Small Screen: The Ewoks and Droids Adventure Hour

Gary Collinson

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Extreme Cinema - Salò (1975)

Salò, 1975.

Directed by Pier Paolo Pasolini.
Starring Paolo Bonacelli, Giorgio Cataldi, Umberto P. Quintavalle and Aldo Valletti.

Salo poster
SYNOPSIS:

In fascist Italy, a group of young people are raped and murdered by an oppressive regime.

Salo or the 120 Days of Sodom
Pier Paolo Pasolini’s final film Salò (Salò o le 120 giornate di Sodoma, 1975) is based on the Marquis de Sade’s novel 120 Days of Sodom. Instead of France, the story is set in the republic of Salò in Fascist Italy towards the end of the Second World War. It features a group of young people being forced to endure a series of ritual (mainly sexual) humiliations at the hands of an oppressive regime. The regime consists of Masters and Storytellers who enact any sexual fantasy at will on these helpless victims. This consists of male and female rape, frequent sexual molestation, excrement eating and torture. If the victims attempt to escape they are killed. The stories told by the Storytellers are deliberately sexually charged and explicit designed to arouse the masters into performing these sadistic sexual acts.

In the film’s opening scenes, the masters choose their victims because of their natural beauty forcing them to strip in front of them so they can stare at their naked bodies and make a selection. The victims are then taken to a mansion where they are told what is going to happen to them. Assembled in a courtyard they are told that they will be treated like animals and used for the sexual pleasure of the masters in the hall of orgies. In the hall of orgies, as the storyteller tells a story a master will rape or molest a male or female victim. Apart from the rape scenes, the film also features heterosexual and homosexual sex. Much of the sex is from the rear. In fact the film leans towards homosexuality as one of the rules of the regime is that consensual heterosexual sex is forbidden. Therefore there are scenes of men kissing and having sex with each other and a scene where the masters cross dress so they can marry other men. The scenes featuring heterosexual sex are decidedly brief in comparison.

The film is also obsessed with bodily functions. A girl is forced to eat the excrement of a master as she annoys him for thinking of her mother. One of the most sickening moments in the film is when a storyteller relays a story about excrement eating which prompts the masters to organise a banquet in which everyone (masters and victims) eat excrement. Also during a story, a master has a girl urinate on him whilst another is content to watch a girl urinate and then urinate in front of her. The film then builds to a grotesquely violent climax in which the victims who have not abided by the rules of the regime are systematically tortured. A guard and a black servant girl are shot for indulging in heterosexual sex. A male victim has his tongue sliced off whilst another has his eye cut out with a knife. A girl victim is raped and then hanged and another has her scalp removed. The masters take turns to administer this sadism and watch each other from a window in the mansion as this takes place in the courtyard.

Salò had originally been submitted to the BBFC by its distributor United Artists in 1976. It was refused a certificate on the grounds of gross indecency which meant that if any part of the film was deemed as indecent the whole film would be rejected. This also meant that under law no artistic defense could be mounted on the film’s behalf.

The then president of the BBFC David Harlech disliked the film but chief censor James Ferman approved of it arguing that it made a strong anti-fascist statement and any censorship would lessen its impact. Ferman was however unable to release it as it became a prosecutable offence to do so. A prosecution case was prepared against the film but was never used. This came after the film was screened as part of a cinema club in 1977 uncertified and uncut at the behest of Ferman but was subsequently seized by police.

Eventually under the Obscene Publications Act the film could be taken as a whole and the charges of indecency dropped, though the film was still liable under the deprave and corrupt test in its uncut form. In an effort to get the film shown, Ferman excised six minutes and inserted an explanatory prologue and this version ran in selected cinemas through the 1970s and 1980s. An uncut version of Salò was later resubmitted to the BBFC by the British Film Institute in the year 2000. This coincided with the BBFC’s new classification guidelines in which it was decided that the film was no longer harmful and was unlikely to deprave and corrupt. The film was then re-released with an 18 certificate that same year and then onto video/DVD in the year 2001.

Despite much strong material, the film does not rejoice in the evil deeds of the masters. The sex scenes are never pornographic and the rape scenes are disturbing in their lack of sensationalism. The atrocities committed by the masters are simply deplorable. They behave as if they are civilized, spouting their fascist ideologies between bouts of rape and torture but are nothing more than sadists. When they force the victims to behave like animals, the film's message is clear that it really is the masters who are the animals. Salò is still a very strong film which is meant to shock and still does.

Santosh Sandhu graduated with a Masters degree in film from the University of Bedfordshire and wrote the short film 'The Volunteers'.

UK Box Office Top Ten - weekend commencing 28/08/09

UK box office top ten and analysis for the weekend of Friday 28th - Sunday 30th August 2009.

Aided no doubt by the promise of live-action 3D for the more mature audience, horror sequel The Final Destination jumps straight in at the top of the UK box office with £3.6m in takings (plus an additional £1m from Bank Holiday Monday), toppling last week's number one film, the Quentin Tarantino WW2 effort Inglourious Basterds. Those numbers provide the biggest opening for a live-action 3D film in the UK, beating that of current chart hit G-Force (which opened with £2.48m five weeks ago and stands in seventh place this week with an overall gross of £12m).

Judd Apatow's latest comedy Funny People opened in third place with just north of £1m in receipts, which must be considered a disappointment given that the $75m production includes marquee names such as Adam Sandler, Seth Rogen, Jonah Hill and Eric Bana. Bana also occupies fourth position with romantic drama The Time Traveler's Wife, while family comedy Aliens in the Attic rounds out the top five, with both films having spent three weeks on our screens.

Fantasy blockbuster Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince drops into the bottom half of the chart in its seventh week but continues to nudge ever closer to the £50m mark and should achieve this by the end of the school holidays. Two other new releases also managed to make their mark, with
Kathryn Bigelow's Iraq War thriller The Hurt Locker opening in eighth and Pedro Amoldovar's latest, Broken Embraces, propping up the chart in tenth. Sandwiched between them in ninth and clinging on for dear life is G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra, which really has performed poorly when compared to the summer's other big budget popcorn flicks.
















































































Pos.FilmWeekend GrossWeekTotal UK Gross
1The Final Destination£3,633,3951













£3,633,395
2Inglourious Basterds£1,276,0122



















£6,632,171
3Funny People£1,001,1521





























£1,001,152
4The Time Traveler's Wife£688,3773

























£5,629,243
5Aliens in the Attic£679,1003





























£4,486,408
6Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince£521,4327

























£49,413,633
7G-Force£468,3785



























£12,009,271
8The Hurt Locker
£308,8871



































£308,887
9GI Joe: The Rise of Cobra£305,0924





























£5,844,998
10Broken Embraces
£296,0481



































£296,048


Incoming...

Two much-hyped films will be looking to make an impact in next weekend's chart with quirky romantic comedy (500) Days of Summer opening today and sci-fi thriller District 9 hitting screens on Friday. Both of these have the potential to take top spot, while action fans could also be drawn towards Gamer starring King Leonidas himself, Gerard Butler.

U.K. Box Office Archive

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Teen Spirit: A John Hughes Profile (Part 2)

Trevor Hogg profiles the career of legendary writer, director and producer John Hughes in the second of a two-part feature... read the first here.

“At the time I came along,” reflected John Hughes, “Hollywood's idea of teen movies meant there had to be a lot of nudity, usually involving boys in pursuit of sex, and pretty gross overall. Either that or a horror movie. And the last thing Hollywood wanted in their teen movies was teenagers!” Then there was the issue of adolescent life experience. “I think it's wrong,” declared the director, “not to allow someone the right to have a problem because of their age. People say, ‘Well, they're young. They have their whole lives ahead of them. What do they have to complain about?’ People forget that when you’re 16, you’re probably more serious than you’ll ever be again. You think seriously about the big questions.” He went on to add, “Kids are smart enough to know that most teenage movies are just exploiting them. They’ll respond to a film about teenagers as people. [My] movies are about the beauty of just growing up.”

Sixteen Candles movie posterThe story of a girl whose family forgets her sixteenth birthday when it falls on the day of her older sister’s wedding was John Hughes’s 1984 directorial debut. As for the origins of Sixteen Candles, the moviemaker remarked, "It really happened to a friend of mine.” When composing the script, Hughes made a conscious decision. “It was my intent to write it from the female point of view,” he said, “because this genre is generally about males, and sex is a predominant theme. I think they tend to ignore the families. When you're 30, you forget that at 16 sex was not your primary motivation; you were much more interested in having a boyfriend or girlfriend.”

For the movie which became John Hughes’s triumphant collaboration with actress Molly Ringwald, commercial success was not a forgone conclusion. “I was very worried,” Hughes confessed, “that some of the long dialogue scenes would get booed off the screen, but I think they work because by the time you reach them, you've gotten to know the characters. I used music in the study-hall scene to sort of propel along a scene that I felt was important but was very slow and very early in the film.”

The Breakfast Club movie posterA year later, The Breakfast Club reunited Ringwald with Hughes to provide a teenage version of The Big Chill (1983); in the film, five high school students representing the different stereotypes, from the rich kid to the nerd, bond during a weekend class detention. Adding to the hip factor was the soundtrack which featured three different mixes of the Simple Minds tune Don’t You (Forget About Me). The preview with the studio exectutives turned out to be less than stellar. “The film ended,” recollected the filmmaker, “they stood up and didn't say a word. I said, 'I think they don't like it.' The producer said, 'It's a piece of s---. It's horrible. It's just a bunch of kids in school talking.' They thought it would be Animal House meets My Dinner With Andre. They put it out in February, which is an awful month [for films], and it was a hit right away. It made $50 million in four weeks and Simple Minds went to #1."

“The idea for Weird Science,” said John Hughes in reference to his other film released in 1985, “came about while waiting for a meeting with producer Joel Silver. I got real excited about it and told him the story, and he liked it. I started writing on a Saturday and mailed a draft out on Monday night. That Sunday we made the deal.” The story was influenced by the sexy pinup posters that hang on bedroom walls. “Two lonely guys tried to create the perfect woman,” explained Hughes, “but, they didn't. They created a physical fantasy who turned out to be an actual person. They hadn't planned on getting a real person, just a great body. They were concentrating on the physical, which is only a very small part of anybody's identity.”

Ferris Buellers Day Off movie poster1986 would see the moviemaker repeat the feat of screening two of his movies in the same year. Howard Deutch made his directorial debut with the Hughes penned and produced, Pretty In Pink. It cast Molly Ringwald as a poor high school student who falls for a rich classmate; the title was taken from a Psychedelic Furs song that was also used in the picture. (The formula proved to be so successful that Deutch’s sophomore effort in 1987 called Some Kind of Wonderful, also scripted and produced by John Hughes, was essentially the same story with the gender roles reversed.) As for the second picture, Matthew Broderick played the lovable rogue in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off. When faced with an impending graduation, Ferris decides to skip off from his classes while he still has the chance. Shot at the high school where John Hughes was once a student, Broderick speaks directly to the camera, thereby, making the audience feel as if they are participating in his mischievous escapades.

There was more than a sense of nostalgia behind the film’s creation. "Chicago is what I am," declared Hughes. "A lot of Ferris is sort of my love letter to the city. And the more people upset with the fact that I film there, the more I'll make sure that's exactly where I film." He went on to say, "It's funny, nobody ever says anything to Woody Allen about always filming in New York. America has this great reverence for New York. I look at it as this decaying horror pit. So let the people in Chicago enjoy Ferris Bueller."

When asked why the city is so important to him, the filmmaker answered, "Chicago is the middle of the country: If it works there, it'll work anywhere. One of the problems of living out here [Hollywood] and getting into this community is that you lose contact with the people you're writing for. I like the industry and the people in it, but everybody out here screens a movie at their house. I'm interested in people who don't see it with perfect projection and excellent Dolby. When I mix the films, I assume they're going to be seen at the Cheyenne 'sixplex' where the systems probably haven't been maintained right. Now that's the way most people see them. Losing that contact is my biggest fear."

Planes Trains and Automobiles movie posterReleased in 1987, Planes, Trains, and Automobiles deals with the misadventures of two men who attempt to get home in time for Thanksgiving. Inspiration came from the moviemaker’s days in the advertising industry when he had to take shuttle flights. "I always wondered about that guy in the middle seat who was always so tired and took his shoes off as soon as he got on the plane," recalled Hughes. "I have a great affection for those guys; my dad and my grandfather were both salesmen. And I admire them. To me, though Neal [Steve Martin] may be more refined and Del [John Candy] may be something of a jerk, Neal needs Del. Privileged people do not have street-smarts, and when their connections don't work, they are totally helpless. Del will always get home. Not with any kind of luxury or class, but he will get there. If Neal doesn't catch the Concorde, he's not gonna make it."

Filming was made difficult due to lack of cooperation on the part of the transportation industry and the weather, however, these were not the most daunting challenges faced by John Hughes. "There were ways to handle the logistical things,” began the director, “but staging that stuff in the motel room where Steve [Neal] and John [Del] spend their first night together, that was the real nightmare. How do you reveal those two guys waking up [unconsciously arm-in-arm] in the morning? How fast should the camera pan? What details should it pick up? The timing's critical, and then how do you get out of a scene like that? Those kinds of things are what really took the work. Getting 300 people to walk across a field in below zero weather - there are an infinite number of solutions to those kinds of problems. But staging a comic moment is the most difficult thing in the world."

Shes Having a Baby movie posterThe shift to an adult-oriented world was a major change for the man normally associated with adolescent cinema. “I hate to say I'm moving beyond anything, because I don't want to denigrate that work or that audience," replied John Hughes, “but most of my stories are going in other directions now. It got to a point where I was starting to repeat myself. How many ways can I shoot a high-school hallway? I'm sure there are millions that I haven't thought of yet, but I felt I should get away and explore what's next. That's really what She's Having a Baby (1988) is about. It's where you go after high school."

1989 had John Candy playing the wayward relative with a heart of gold in Uncle Buck; the character, as Hughes put it, is “completely illiterate in the ways of a family”. By placing Candy in parental control of a group of neglected children, comic mayhem ensues. "The only thing he would have to offer is time and interest,” said Hughes. “The parents were jerks. I'm sort of hard on parents. I grew up in a family where kids came first."

Home Alone movie posterThe biggest commercial hit for John Hughes occurred in 1990 with the debut of Home Alone. The concept for the project, which made Hollywood celebrities out of director Chris Columbus (Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets) and child actor Macaulay Culkin, occurred while Hughes was planning a vacation for his family. "I was thinking,” remarked the film’s scriptwriter and producer, “and then I got this weird feeling - What if we left one of the kids? Bang. This is cool. This could be a movie." He went on to add, "One of the things I most enjoyed about Home Alone was that I made a segment of the marketplace laugh at things they don't usually laugh at." He said, "It wasn't macho jokes. It was this little kid running around dropping paint cans on guys. And you could hear grown men laugh. That was really satisfying for me. To be able to sit in a mixed audience, and they're all laughing at the same thing. That was really fun. I was sitting there saying to myself: 'I know how to do this.' "

The last time John Hughes sat behind the camera was in 1991, with the father and daughter con artist comedy Curly Sue. Despite retiring from directing to spend more time with his family, Hughes remained active as a creative force behind two Home Alone sequels, Beethoven (1992), Miracle on 34th Street (1994), 101 Dalmatians (1996), Reach the Rock (1998), and Maid in Manhattan (2002). He remained unapologetic for being a populist storyteller. "I have no interest,” Hughes declared, “none whatsoever, in doing something for myself instead of for the audience. My movies are popular because they do what they're supposed to do. You get what you think you're going to get. They're not pretentious. They're not hyped. They're accessible." Upon further reflection, he remarked, "Most of my material is about life getting changed, or realizing something. Ferris says, 'Life moves pretty fast - if you don't stop and look around, you could miss it.' That's the thing I most fear - missing my life."

The man, who made stars of Matthew Broderick, Molly Ringwald, Emilio Estevez, Anthony Michael Hall, Ally Sheedy, Judd Nelson, Macaulay Culkin and John Candy, and inspired a new generation of filmmakers such as Kevin Smith (Clerks), Wes Anderson (Rushmore) and Judd Apatow (Knocked Up), died on August 6th, 2009, while visiting his family in Manhattan.

Read John Hughes' original Vacation story here, or watch a tribute film to commemorate his 1991 Producer of the Year Award from the National Association of Movie Theater Owners.

Trevor Hogg is a freelance video editor and writer who currently resides in Canada.