Thursday, November 4, 2010

Thoughts on... Up in the Air (2009)

Up in the Air, 2009.

Directed by Jason Reitman.
Starring George Clooney, Vera Farmiga, Anna Kendrick, Jason Bateman, Melanie Lynskey, Zach Galifianakis, J. K. Simmons and Sam Elliott.

Up in the Air poster
SYNOPSIS:

An airborne corporate downsizer discovers that life on the move can be a lonely business.

Up in the Air George Clooney
There are basically two George Clooneys. There’s the lovable, charming, cocky George. You know the suave Danny Ocean type with that irresistible playful glimmer in his eye. And then there’s cold, calculating, enigmatic Mr Clooney, who oozes just as much mysterious charisma as George, but from a more serious, furrowed face. Like the bearded suit in Syriana or what I imagine the detached, ruthless assassin to be like in Anton Corbjin’s upcoming picturesque character study, The American. The grave Mr Clooney doesn’t get out so much, not because he’s not up to scratch, but because the whole wide world can’t seem to get enough of George.

And it’s definitely the face of likeable bad boy George that Clooney wears in Juno director’s Jason Reitman’s 2009 rom-com Up in the Air. As you might expect from the director of Juno however, this is a rom-com with a twist and consequently a different take on George’s familiar face of fun. There are lashings of misery, isolation and loneliness in this movie that ought to deflate it and well and truly puncture its comedy moments. The audience ought to despise central character Ryan Bingham’s cheery detachment in the midst of the gloom, but it’s a credit to Clooney’s sheer charisma that you’re almost always rooting for him and seeing the pluses of Bingham’s bleak and extreme philosophy of life.

Put simply and less eloquently, persuasively or amusingly as Bingham phrases it, this philosophy is; travel light. Ditch not only the material possessions but the emotional baggage of normal existence to stay on the move and thus continue to feel alive for as long as possible. Wrap yourself in a cotton wool world of luxury that you are fully aware is fake and artificial but nevertheless gives you a simple satisfaction and loyalty. Embrace exclusivity and inhabit a cocoon of consistency away from the volatile real world. Spend the bulk of your time away from the worker ants tethered to the ground but weightless, floating and drifting, blissfully Up in the Air.

It’s essentially the dream life on the road and Bingham has achieved it so that it has become his normal existence. He has refined and perfected his life to tailor his ever moving, but basic needs. But then two things happen to shatter the cycle of bliss. Anna Kendrick’s Natalie devises a cost saving strategy for Bingham’s company, whereby people like him who skilfully fire people no longer do so face to face across the nation, but from a remote computer screen in the company’s base in Omaha, via the wonders of modern technology. And Bingham meets Vera Farmigan’s Alex, who seems to be his perfect match and as Alex puts it essentially him “with a vagina”. Initially they enjoy each other’s company, are extremely compatible sexually and amusingly synchronise their schedules for further bouts of spontaneous passion. It’s safe organised fun and Bingham doesn’t consider a future with her.

Bingham reacts with scorn to Natalie’s idea of modernising his company and swiftly destroying his way of life. He successfully wins himself the chance to take the young upstart on a brutal tour of the realities of “corporate downsizing”. It’s in this portion of the film that Reitman’s fondness for making us simultaneously laugh and cry at deep, depressing subjects comes into play. It’s also where we see not only an extremely familiar charismatic George, charming people in impossible situations, but also a character who underneath it all does care about the impact of his work, and regards what he does as an art, in that if it is done right he genuinely believes he can steer the newly unemployed on a dignified path to a new life. There are a number of awkward, funny and emotionally affecting scenes where either Clooney or Kendrick must fire someone, and each person offers a new challenge Bingham insists cannot be dealt with via webcam.

Away from the backdrop of a new wave of unemployment, philosophies of life and exploiting misery, Up in the Air becomes a simple love story, in which Bingham realises he wants something, or someone, weighing him down in his previously empty rucksack, giving his life meaning by grounding it. Kendrick’s performance as Natalie is wonderfully believable and funny at times, and it is she who forces Bingham to accept his loneliness, his prolonged state of running through the crowd from his unhappiness. Tragically, even after Bingham has accepted Alex into his life as his guest at his sister’s wedding and physically abandoned his philosophy by running away from a speech he was giving about it, we are reminded of the attraction of travelling light. Bingham finds Alex at her home with a secret family of her own, a real life. He cannot believe he was foolish enough to think she was sharing a real life as empty as his own with him. By packing people in our rucksacks we risk being hurt by them.

The whole film is wonderfully acted, right down to the performances of those freshly fired employees and their varied responses. It also looks great, emphasising the glamour of the hotel bubble world Bingham lives in, as well as its isolation. The opening titles of the film play out to jazzy music and some stylishly edited shots of the ground from above, taking in a multi-coloured picture of America. Despite the good points it’s never actually that funny, with the humour being more of the slight smile at the corners of the mouth than roaring chortle variety. However ultimately the onscreen magnetism of George Clooney drives Up in the Air and is all the more compelling for channelling it in a refreshing, alternative way.

Liam Trim (follow me on Twitter)

Movie Review Archive

Heartfelt Laughter: A Jason Reitman Profile

Five Essential... Hammer Horrors

Simon Moore selects his Five Essential Hammer Horrors...

There was a time when horror cinema wasn’t about jump shocks and buckets of red paint. When ‘horrifying’ an audience meant casting a deep, impending sense of dread over them; a feeling certain to stay with them long after the theatre lights came up and they left to go home.

In the 1950s and 60s, Hammer Film Productions created some of the most adventurous, shocking, atmospheric and, of course, horrifying films ever seen. The ‘70s saw more visceral and realistic horror like The Shining and The Exorcist, but nobody since the late ‘60s has come close to Hammer’s glorious embrace of the gothic.

These films are about a heightened sense of reality; where worlds very like our own come face to face with disaster and death – and like our world, the heroes rarely win. They might vanquish the evil presence – be it vampires, devils, or creatures sewn together from dead flesh – but nothing will let them forget their gruesome ordeal, or the terrible things they did to get out alive.

Hammer’s output was by no means consistent, though. Just as many hammy, garish flops emerged from Bray Studios as did genuinely chilling pieces of gothic horror.
However, for the uninitiated, for the curious, and especially for people who only know Peter Cushing as Tarkin in Star Wars, here are five Hammer horror films that have stood the unforgiving test of time, unquestionably earning the right to be called ‘classics’.

5. The Curse of Frankenstein (1957, dir. Terence Fisher)

The Curse of Frankenstein Hammer HorrorThis isn’t what you think it is. It’s not an hour and a half of the infamous Creature snapping necks and wreaking havoc. The Creature (Christopher Lee in his breakthrough role) and his physical monstrosity are put firmly in the shade by Peter Cushing’s dark, enigmatic Baron Frankenstein.

The horror here is not exhibited in tasteless gore or cheap shocks. It comes from Frankenstein’s growing obsession; the mad, desperate acts he perpetrates, all under the auspices of science and progress. Director Terence Fisher shows us a Frankenstein who is murderous, treacherous, vindictive; who will sacrifice anyone and anything for the sake of his experiments.

Make no mistake; Frankenstein is the monster here, not his Creature. Yet Cushing doesn’t go for the traditional cackling. There’s not a trace of that maniacal cry “It’s alive!” He reveals Frankenstein’s true nature by degrees; in little smiles playing around his lips, in cold glances to his mistresses, even as he holds them in his arms. It’s not until his last moments on screen that he even so much as raises his voice, calling out to his former friend in chilling, unearthly screams.

4. Dracula (1958, dir. Terence Fisher)

Dracula Hammer HorrorThe first and the best of Hammer’s dabbling in vampire lore. Christopher Lee is let loose as the Count himself, taking a wholly original and dynamic approach to the role. His Dracula cannot turn into bats or mist; he’s completely reliant on his wits and his sheer power of presence. Mortal men are utterly powerless before his gaze. Women fall under his spell, totally given over to his will.

Luckily for Victorian women with heaving bosoms everywhere, Dr. Van Helsing is on the case, and he has Dracula’s number. Cushing rises to the fore as the dashing vampire hunter, as intrepid and energetic in pursuit as he is patient and fatherly with those under his protection.

Considering the severely limited budget (a constant restriction on Hammer’s resources), Dracula offers a story of tremendous scope and vision. Where many Dracula adaptations have since faltered by heaping ponderous speeches about immortality and iffy accents on the Count, Fisher give us a Dracula who doesn’t waste words. In fact, beyond his opening pleasantries to Jonathan Harker, Lee has no lines at all, beyond the odd hiss or howl.

This works with Lee, though. He’s no sparkly, angst-ridden adolescent. He’s a near-unstoppable supernatural force – irresistible to his victims, and terrifying to his opponents.

3. The Hound of the Baskervilles (1959, dir. Terence Fisher)

The Hound of the Baskervilles Hammer HorrorMore than 20 different versions of this Sherlock Holmes tale have been filmed over the last 70 years, but few, if any, have equalled Hammer’s version for thrills, for style or for sheer horror. Like Curse of Frankenstein, the horror is not in the reveal of the monster, but in the eerie, ominous atmosphere built up around and by the characters.

Cushing is back in the lead, this time as the world’s greatest detective (no, not Batman). He’s commissioned to look into the mysterious deaths surrounding Sir Henry Baskerville, cursed to die, as legend would have it, in terror in revenge for his ancestor’s crimes. Holmes warns Baskerville – do not go out on the Moors at night.

We follow in Watson’s footsteps for much of the film, taking in the bleak landscape, and the strange tenants of the Baskerville estate – any one of them seems capable of murder, and Fisher doesn’t let us forget it. Even for those familiar with the tale, the suspicions fly everywhere – did the old butler, cunning and subtly evasive, do it? Was it Dr Mortimer, with his flashing eyes and flaring temper? The mysteries and the tensions coil up, slow and deliberate, careful not to spring loose until the final, terrible solution presents itself.

2. She (1965, dir. Robert Day)

She HammerEuropean castles get a break for once, as Hammer turns its attentions to Africa, and the troubling question of immortality. John Richardson, Bernard Cribbins and Hammer stalwart Peter Cushing, as recently de-mobbed WW1 soldiers, set out on a quest to find the lost city of Kuma, where Ayesha (Ursula Andress), an immortal Egyptian queen, awaits her reincarnated lover. She seems convinced that Leo Vincey (Richardson) is that lover, and proceeds to enchant, seduce and more or less throw herself at him until he agrees to be hers, forever.

There is, naturally, a catch. Being “changeless, ageless, deathless” has had its toll on Ayesha. In two thousand years of waiting, she has become a cruel, vindictive tyrant, wielding absolute power over a populace who live in mortal dread of seeing her elegant, flawless face.

Between the portents of doom and ruthless executions, director Robert Day also treats us to some truly breathtaking visuals – the spiralling backstreets of Cairo, desert vistas and labyrinthine halls of Kuma are no mere backdrops; they’re at the heart of what makes She so fascinating and enthralling.

It’s a story full of grim death and heart-breaking despair, yet Day never overloads on either. Cribbins and Cushing have a lot to do with this, bringing a light-hearted, human touch, trying but never quite succeeding to bring their friend back down to Earth. As Ayesha’s mystic fire finally descends, and the bodies pile up, a precious few are left to ponder, and to wish they’d listened to Bernard Cribbins.

1. The Devil Rides Out (1968, dir. Terence Fisher)

The Devil Rides Out Hammer HorrorHammer’s crowning glory sees Christopher Lee finally playing the hero, crossing swords with Charles Gray’s satanic priest, Mr Mocata. As the Duc de Richleau, Lee dominates this film, bringing the considerable presence he brought to Dracula and setting it against the powers of darkness.

In 1920s England, a friend of Richleau’s is being groomed for satanic baptism by Mocata, along with a fey young girl, Tanith. Lee and his sidekick make it their business to extract these impressionable young things from the society of creepy devil-worshippers.

There’s something distinctly un-nerving about an elderly dame’s eyes lighting up at the sight of a goat sacrifice, and Fisher is careful to let us see the actors’ reactions rather than the gruesome spectacle itself, knowing that our imaginations often paint a much darker picture for themselves. That said, there’s no shortage of violent possessions, cross-eyed demons and wide-eyed horror.

The lasting appeal of The Devil Rides Out can be summed up in one word. Wait, no it can’t. There’s far too many things that appeal about this film. Suffice to say, this is the ultimate Hammer Horror. It creeps. It thrills. It throws magic and astronomy and psychological warfare at us and never feels like it’s over-reaching itself. Lee speaks in mystic and severe tones, but we don’t feel talked down to or stupid for not knowing what the Grand Sabbat of the year is. This is not Christopher Lee’s favourite film for nothing.

Honourable Mentions...

Hammer’s horror legacy is extensive - The Mummy (1959), Dracula: Prince of Darkness (1966) and The Quatermass Xperiment (1955) are but a few of the gory delights awaiting the curious horror fan. Happily, it’s a legacy that’s far from over. The eagerly anticipated Let Me In (2010) looks to be the start of a whole new era of Hammer Horror classics with titles like The Resident (2010) and The Woman In Black (2011) next in line for release. Bring on the nightmares.

Simon Moore is a budding screenwriter, passionate about films both current and classic. He has a strong comedy leaning with an inexplicable affection for 80s montages and movies that you can’t quite work out on the first viewing.

Essentials Archive

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

The Man and His Dream: A Francis Ford Coppola Profile (Part 1)

Trevor Hogg profiles the career of legendary filmmaker Francis Ford Coppola in the first of a five-part feature...

“I used to have synchronized movies,” recalled filmmaker Francis Ford Coppola of his industrious childhood. “Most of them I cut together from home movies my family had shot.” Charging admission for the neighbourhood screenings, the cinematic venture proved to be a lucrative enterprise for the young Coppola. “When I was about eighteen, I became very interested in Eisenstein. I read all of his work and went to see his films at the Museum of Modern Art,” stated the Detroit, Michigan native. “Taking my example from him, I went to theatre school and worked very hard.” After directing a number of plays, Francis Ford Coppola was drawn back to moviemaking. “In my third year at Hofstra, I sold my car and bought a 16mm camera…I went out to make a short, which I never finished. It was a subjective piece about a woman who takes her children out for a day in the country and she shows them all of these beautiful things [After falling asleep in an orchard she awakens to discover that her children have vanished].” Earning his Bachelor of Arts degree, Coppola attended the film school at the University of California at Los Angeles.

“While I was going to UCLA I became one of Roger Corman’s assistants. He’d called me when he wanted cheap labour. I was the dialogue director on the Tower of London [1962] and I was Roger’s sound man on The Young Racers [1963].” Francis Ford Coppola took advantage of the legendary B-movie producer’s shrewd inclination to get the most of his travel expenses by having his film crew make two pictures rather than one. “I talked Roger into putting up $20,000,” recalled Coppola who sought out other investors. “I met an English producer in Dublin and he heard we were making a movie – which we weren’t, really yet – and he was willing to buy the English rights… With the $20,000 he paid me and the $20,000 Roger put up, I was able to direct my first feature film – based on a script it had taken me three nights to write. I shot it with a nine man crew and some of the actors who were in The Young Racers. At the time, I was twenty-two and still a student at film school. Some people – including friends of mine – paid their own way to come over to Dublin and work on the film. That’s how I met my wife [Eleanor Neil served as the assistant art director]. Dementia 13 [1963] was meant to be an exploitative film. Psycho [1960] was a big hit; William Castle had just made Homicidal [1961], and Roger always makes pictures that are like other pictures. So it was meant to be a horror film with a lot of people getting killed with axes and so forth.” Reflecting on the movie which stars William Campbell (Blood Bath), Luana Anders (The Last Detail), Bart Patton (Gidget Goes Hawaiian), Mary Mitchel (A Swingin’ Summer), Patrick Magee (A Clockwork Orange) and Eithne Dunne (No Resting Place), the director mused, “I think it showed promise. It was imaginative…In many ways, it had some of the nicest visuals I’ve ever done. Mainly, because I composed every shot. In the present circumstances, you never have the time so you just leave it to others. Dementia 13 got very good reviews and I made money on it. In England, it was released as The Haunted and the Hunted.”

“I came back after Dementia 13 and I got married,” remarked Francis Ford Coppola. “A week later I got this chance, really on the basis of the Samuel Goldwyn screenwriting award I won at school, to write Reflections in a Golden Eye [1967] for Seven Arts [later Warner Bros.-Seven Arts]. They liked it very much and gave me a contract for three years at $500 a week, so I left school.” The studio work was creatively frustrating for the aspiring filmmaker. “I know that none of my eleven scripts – Reflections, This Property is Condemned [1966] – ever got on the screen very much like I wrote them,” said Coppola. “It was traumatic. I was one of ten writers on Is Paris Burning? [1966], but Gore Vidal [Last of the Mobile Hot Shots] and I got the full screen credit for that fiasco. I quit and was fired at the same time. I was broke. I’d lost all of my money. I owed the bank $10,000, and I had two kids and a wife to support.”

Matters turned worse for the moviemaker. “Seven Arts had appropriated my script of You’re a Big Boy Now [1966], which I had written during nights in Paris to stay sane,” lamented the director. “They maintained that since I wrote it on their time they had the right to keep it.” Bad luck gave way to good fortune. “20th Century-Fox hired me to write the life of General Patton for $50,000,” said Francis Ford Coppola who won his first Oscar for co-writing the screenplay for Patton (1970). “With that money, I girded myself and I made Big Boy.” For writing and directing the cinematic adaptation of You’re a Big Boy Now by novelist David Benedictus, Coppola was paid $8,000. Breaking away from his domineering parents (Geraldine Page and Rip Torn), a young man (Peter Kastner) heads to the big city. “I really had to hustle to get that film made,” stated the American filmmaker of his first major studio picture. “I buffaloed the whole thing through. I got everyone committed before they even realized there was a package I’d put together.”

Shot entirely on location in New York City over a twenty-nine day period, the coming-of-age comedy cost $800,000 to produce. “By the time I got to make it, I didn’t know whether I wanted to make it anymore.” The three year production delay caused complications. “One of the great pities was that I had written You’re a Big Boy Now before Dick Lester’s The Knack […and How to Get It, 1965] came out, and yet everyone said it was a copy.” Francis Ford Coppola submitted the completed picture as his thesis to UCLA and obtained his Master of Cinema degree. Newsweek published a praiseworthy movie review, “Not since [Orson] Welles was a boy wonder or [Stanley] Kubrick a kid has any young American made a film as original, spunky or just plain funny as this one.” The film received an Oscar nomination for Best Supporting Actress (Geraldine Page) and contended at the BAFTAs for Most Promising Newcomer to Leading Film Roles (Peter Kastner); the Golden Globes lauded it with nominations for Best Picture – Musical or Comedy, Best Actress – Musical or Comedy (Elizabeth Hartman), and Best Supporting Actress (Geraldine Page) while Francis Ford Coppola was nominated by the Writers Guild of America for Best Written American Comedy.

“When I finished Big Boy, I resolved I wouldn’t make the same mistake as a lot of guys – to suddenly get into projects over their head, films they didn’t have complete control over,” declared Francis Ford Coppola. Finian’s Rainbow [1968] came along and I took it, though I didn’t know the play. I only knew the [musical] score. When I read the book [by E.Y. Harburg and Fred Saidy], I was amazed.” For his Hollywood sophomore effort, Coppola found himself directing Fred Astaire (The Towering Inferno), Petula Clark (Made in Heaven), Tommy Steele (Skywatch), Don Francks (Johnny Mnemonic), Barbara Hancock (Cry for Poor Wally), Keenan Wynn (Nashville), and Ronald Colby. “I was hired because they [Warner Bros.-Seven Arts] wanted to zip it up and do it à la Big Boy,” observed the moviemaker on how he came to be behind the camera for the $3.5 million musical production. “I tried to be very faithful and to do all of the work underneath so it wouldn’t come out like what they did to A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum [1966] and films like that. I really tried to show some discipline, to make it work on its own terms.” A mysterious Irishman and his daughter arrive in a small Southern town, pursued by a leprechaun. “The whole picture was made on the Warner’s back lot. I shot just eight days out of the studio. The location footage was carefully interspersed in the film and used with the titles. Yet look at what we were competing with. The Sound of Music [1965], where they go and sit on the Alps for a month.”

There was an issue with the source material. “I think I always knew that the show, critically, was going to be received ungenerously,” admitted Francis Ford Coppola. “A lot of liberal people were going to feel it was old pap, because of the dated civil rights stance…And [I knew] the conservatives were going to say it was a lot of liberal nonsense.” Coppola does not believe he is entirely blameless. “Directing takes a lot of concentration, being able to be blind to certain problems, and just focus where you should be focusing. I did that in some cases. In some cases I failed. With Tommy [Steele], I wanted a different kind of performance and he eluded me.” Despite his misgivings about the production, Finian’s Rainbow received Oscar nominations for Best Musical Score and Best Sound; at the Golden Globes it competed for Best Picture – Musical or Comedy, Best Actor – Musical or Comedy (Fred Astaire), Best Actress – Musical or Comedy (Petula Clark), Best Supporting Actress (Barbara Hancock) and Most Promising Newcomer – Female (Barbara Hancock). The Writers Guild of American nominated the screenplay, written by E.Y. Harburg and Fred Saidy, for Best Written American Comedy.

“Nobody else could have made The Rain People [1969],” declared Francis Ford Coppola of the $750,000 project. “That film was a labour of love. We had a very small crew in a remodeled Dodge bus that we rebuilt ourselves and filled with the most advanced motion picture equipment available. I presented the movie to the studio as a fait accompli. I told them on a Friday, ‘Look, I’m starting to shoot on Monday and I need some money. If you don’t give it to me, I’ll get it from someone else.’ They gave me the money and I never showed them the script.” Summarizing the storyline, the director stated, “What it really comes down to is a pregnant woman [Shirley Knight], sitting in a car, literally walking out on all the responsibilities one associates with a young wife.” Portraying the hitchhiker whom Knight picks up on her journey of self-discovery is James Caan (Thief) who performs along with Robert Duvall (The Apostle), Marya Zimmet, Tom Aldredge (What About Bob?), Laurie Crews and Andrew Duncan (Slap Shot). “We traveled for four months through eighteen states, filming as we went” recalled Coppola. “We did not set out with a finished screenplay in hand but continued filling it out as shooting progressed. When I spied a setting that appealed to me along the way, we would stop, and I would work out a scene for the actors to play.” The Rain People won the Grand Prize and Best Director at the San Sebastian International Film Festival.

“I wanted to own all of my pictures,” declared Francis Ford Coppola who obtained a $300,000 development deal from Warner Bros for ten screenplays as well as another $300,000 from the Hollywood studio to allow him to establish his own independent unit based in San Francisco. “Francis saw [American] Zoetrope as a sort of alternative Easy Rider [1969] studio where he could get a lot of young talent for nothing,” stated filmmaker George Lucas (Star Wars) who served as the director’s assistant on Finian’s Rainbow and spearheaded a behind the scenes documentary on the making of The Rain People. “We had very off-the-wall ideas that never would have been allowed to infiltrate the studios.” One of the unconventional concepts was expanding a short film co-written and directed by Lucas, as a film student, into a theatrical release. “George was like a younger brother to me,” remarked Coppola, who produced his protégé’s feature length debut THX 1138 (1970). “I loved him. Where I went, he went.” Francis Ford Coppola served as the mediator between George Lucas and Warner Bros. while the science fiction tale about a futuristic dictatorial society, where emotional attachments amongst co-workers are forbidden, was being developed and assembled. When the picture starring Robert Duvall, Donald Pleasence (Halloween), Maggie McOmie (Grand Junction), and Don Pedro Colley (Sugar Hill) was screened for studio executives as a work in progress, it was deemed to be so unintelligible that they demanded back their investment of $600,000. Having already spent the money, Francis Ford Coppola found himself in the midst of a financial crisis which threatened the very existence of his newly formed production company.

Continue to part two.

For more on Francis Ford Coppola and his body of work visit the online home of American Zoetrope.

Movies... For Free! Dementia 13 (1963)

Trevor Hogg is a freelance video editor and writer who currently resides in Canada.

54th BFI London Film Festival: Kaboom (2010)

Kaboom, 2010.

Written and Directed by Gregg Araki.
Starring Thomas Dekker, Juno Temple, Haley Bennett and James Duval.


SYNOPSIS:

Kaboom focuses on Smith, a film student studying at college, lusting after his dumb-surfer room-mate, hooking up with British acquaintance London and hanging out with best friend Stella. He keeps getting recurring dreams of walking down a corridor lined with his friends, his mother, and two girls he doesn’t recognise. Things start to get complicated when he begins to encounter strange men wearing animal masks and a girl's headless torso turns up in a dumpster.


I first came across Gregg Araki when a friend handed me a US uncut VHS of The Doom Generation, simply saying 'You'll love it'. He was right. The biting satire, the dumb on the surface yet scathingly critical dialogue (echoes of the seminal 80s hardcore band 'Black Flag'), the 'film student on speed' editing, the fantastic music. I could go on, but the film’s very own tagline sums The Doom Generation up so well - Sex. Violence. Whatever. It's the very definition of a cult movie, and has stubbornly refused to budge from my personal top ten despite the five years since I first saw it. His self-dubbed 'Teen Apocalypse Trilogy', comprising of Doom Generation, Totally Fucked Up and Nowhere are all mini-masterpieces, while his breakthrough film The Living End is a riveting comment on homophobia, 90s apathy and the Bush administration.

In 2004, he got the mainstream critical success he'd long deserved, with the release of his harrowing yet sensitive portrayal of child abuse in Mysterious Skin. This film represented a change of tone for the director, moving away from the hyperactive cinematic-referencing of his cult work into a calm, serious tone that allows the story to truly unfold. However follow up film Smiley Face was a half-baked stoner comedy, good fun, but a major disappointment for a director of Araki's calibre. So I approached Kaboom with a certain level of trepidation, particularly after I'd heard rumours of it being a bit iffy.

The first act of the film feels like a return to the days of his ‘Teenage Apocalypse Trilogy’ for Araki, with an ensemble cast of hedonistic characters hanging out, getting laid and spouting amazing dialogue like “That guy sounds like a fucking ass-tard”. The dialogue and deliberately stunted delivery feels almost like a mockery of ‘high class’ cinema, a celebration of the trash aesthetic with my friend noting that a lot of the dialogue sounds like it’s from the plot for a porn film. The second act was less inspired though, with Smith uncovering an ‘End of the World’ plot (another Araki obsession) and various plot points being thrown in rather hap-hazardly. It starts to feel a little ‘film-studenty’ and there’s a lot of dialogue explaining what’s going on, whereas some exposition in these scenes would have been much more welcome. All is forgiven though for the third act, in which Araki really kicks things into top gear. The story takes a zany turn with multiple bizarre revelations - psychics, ex-cult members, ‘The Resistance’ and an epic car chase sound tracked by Placebo’s ‘The Bitter End’. The final scene features the cult’s leader sitting slumped at a table in front of a red button, a vacant expression on his face, before he nonchalantly pushes it and the planet explodes! Gleefully ridiculous!

As I mentioned you’ve got Placebo over the final scenes and end credits, but Araki’s fascination with music extends past excellent soundtracking – he focuses on music as a sacred commodity (Stella’s birthday gift to Smith is a signed CD of his favourite band) and also as a way to bring people together. (Smith’s crush Oliver finds his email address via the Explosions in the Sky website).

Araki’s status as an Auteur director is re-established in Kaboom, certainly in a visual sense. The three frequent visual staples of Araki’s films – incredible, outlandish set design (see the black & white check hotel room in The Doom Generation), thematic colour schemes (bathing scenes in primary coloured light – blues and reds, a subtle tribute to Dario Argento perhaps?) and punky, over-the-top costume – are all present, proving that if nothing, Araki knows what makes for stunning mise-en-scene.

One of the strangest things about former flop Smiley Face was that it only really focused on one main character, as opposed to a circle of misfits, and also that that character was straight. Araki was a key figure of the New Queer Cinema movement of the 90s and as such the majority of his main characters were gay or bisexual, using the characters to critique the homophobia ingrained in Western society. For example, Totally Fucked Up consisted mostly of interviews with gay teens speaking of their experiences and the discriminations they’ve encountered. Kaboom’s two main protagonists – Smith and Stella are both gay/bi, but with society nowadays being much more forward thinking, there doesn’t seem to be as much homophobia to object against. The political subtext of his earlier work seems rather absent, or at least dialled down. The characters are not as mockingly nihilistic as his earlier creations and there’s a creeping sense that Kaboom, despite being an anarchic comedy akin to Araki’s former output, has lost the satirical bite which marked Araki as a master of intelligent yet wildly entertaining trash cinema. That doesn’t stop Kaboom being a hell of a lot of fun though.

Roger Holland

Movie Review Archive

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Will Arnie Be Back?

With his time as Governor of California drawing to a close what might the future hold for Arnold Schwarzenegger..?

Arnold SchwarzeneggerFrom humble origins in post-war Austria, Arnold Schwarzenegger has gone on to enjoy an extraordinary career and achieved unprecedented success in three vastly different professions. Rising to the summit of the bodybuilding world with seven Mr. Olympia titles, Schwarzenegger then turned his attention to Hollywood and became the biggest action star of the 80s and 90s before focussing on his political ambitions when he announced his candidacy in the 2003 California recall election. Defeating his nearest rival by over 1 million votes, “The Governator” assumed office in November 2003 and was re-elected three years later for a second term, which is scheduled to expire in January 2011.

Barring a change to the US Constitution it seems the end is nigh for Arnie’s political career, so what does the future hold for the Austrian Oak? It’s been seven years since his last leading role in Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines but a recent cameo appearance in Sylvester Stallone’s action ensemble The Expendables would suggest a return to the silver screen is certainly on the cards. Does the 63-year-old have enough left in the tank to regain his status as one of Hollywood’s top names and if so, just how would be go about achieving this? Let’s take a look at some of the possibilities…

If the last few years have taught us anything it seems one of the best ways for a faded action star to kick-start a comeback is by returning to well of past successes. It worked for Stallone with Rocky Balboa and Rambo - and to a lesser extent, Bruce Willis with Live Free or Die Hard - so could this be the path for Arnold to follow? Well, he’s kind of already done it with his main franchise, appearing as the T-800 in McG’s Terminator Salvation courtesy of archive footage and some technical wizardry, but in all honesty that’s probably about as far as age will allow him to go. I mean, would he really be convincing now as an unstoppable killing machine? It was pushing it last time round.

King Conan Arnold SchwarzeneggerSo, that’s Terminator out then and the only other recurring role Arnie has under his belt is Conan, which is already getting a reboot in 2011 with Jason Momoa (Stargate: Atlantis) headlining as the Cimmerian warrior. This probably isn’t too much of an issue as it would require a gruelling training regime and even more technical wizardry than Salvation for Arnie to pull off Conan the Barbarian once again. Should Marcel Nispel’s remake prove popular enough to warrant any sequels then I could see them shoehorning in a quick cameo somehow, but I think we can safely assume that a full-on return to Robert E. Howard’s Barbarian is about as likely as Mr. Freeze cropping up in Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight Rises.

Although his involvement is limited to just the one movie, there is another franchise in Arnold’s back catalogue that could play host to a return. In fact, early rumours had suggested Schwarzenegger would reprise his role as Dutch from Predator for a short scene in the recent reboot from producer Robert Rodriguez. Although this never materialised, Rodriguez has left the door open for Dutch to pop up in the Predators sequel. Don’t be surprised to see this happen; Arnie is certainly fond of his cameos, keeping his 'acting' toes wet since his last major outing with appearances in The Rundown, Around the World in 80 Days, The Kid & I and Cars, but it’s certainly not going to set off a career resurgence in the way that Rocky Balboa did for Stallone.

Arnold Schwarzenegger Tom Arnold James CameronCameos are all well and good but let’s face it - Arnold’s a guy who’s used to his name before the title, taking up half the poster in big, bold text, and he really needs to be the main man. If he’s going follow the Stallone route then the only other possibility I can think of comes in the form of secret agent Harry Tasker. Talk of a sequel to True Lies is nothing new (particularly in the mind of co-star Tom Arnold), although director James Cameron has routinely distanced himself from the idea and is now wrapped up in all things Avatar for the foreseeable future. Does that make it a pipe dream? Well, not really. Cameron is rumoured to have a True Lies television series in development so it wouldn’t be too much of a stretch to get involved in a producing capacity on a sequel. Besides, Cameron’s absence didn’t put Schwarzenegger off the Terminator franchise ($30m salaries really help to ease the separation anxiety), so even if this wasn’t the case I’m sure some sort of deal could be agreed.

Out of all the possibilities so far a True Lies sequel seems the most likely to me, unless of course he decides to go with something completely original. Should Arnold opt for this route you’d have to imagine he’d be uncomfortable returning to the violent, hard-R output of his early career, especially as he spent much of the 90s distancing himself from this in favour of more family-friendly material. Given his age this would probably be a wise decision and if recent photographs are anything to go by then Arnold has some catching up to do against his contemporaries in the physique stakes, so a tongue-in-cheek approach is surely the only way to go. I suppose there's also the option of playing against type in a more dramatic role, but that's not really going to happen, is it?

So with little more than a couple of months left for The Governator, we should soon begin to get an idea of where Schwarzenegger is headed next. There has been talk of Arnie penning a memoir, which would no doubt prove a huge seller, and if that turns out to be the case I'd expect to see him crop up in a few cameos here and there, starting of course with The Expendables 2. As for a fully fledged comeback it's going to be a tough road, but as his past career shows, Arnie doesn't settle for second best and if that's the route he takes you'd have to be a fool to bet against him succeeding.

Related:

Five Essential Arnie Characters

Gary Collinson

Saw 3D traps UK audiences to take the Halloween box office crown

UK box office top ten and analysis for the weekend of Friday 29th - Sunday 31st October 2010.

Over the past few years it seems Halloween hasn't been complete without a new Saw film hitting screens and this year is no different, with the seventh installment Saw 3D making its debut at the top of the UK chart with £3.6m including Thursday previews. Saw 3D opens to more than double that of its predecessor Saw VI and with a similar return in North America - Saw 3D's opening weekend is just under $1.5m shy of Saw VI's lifetime haul - you'd expect that promised last entry to quickly be forgotten.

Illumination Entertainment must be rather pleased with the performance of Despicable Me, which holds onto second place this week and is now the highest-earner in the chart with a three-week gross of £15m. Meanwhile last week's number one Paranormal Activity 2 slips two places to third, with Bruce Willis action flick Red and Facebook drama The Social Network falling one spot each to fourth and fifth respectively.

Along with Saw 3D, two other new faces make an appearance in the chart this week. First up is the Simon Pegg black comedy Burke and Hare from director John Landis, which takes sixth place with £942k, followed by comedy-drama The Kids Are All Right in ninth with £411k. Sandwiched between the newcomers are CG-animations Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga'Hoole and Alpha and Omega, while Twilight spoof Vampires Suck rounds out the chart in tenth.

Number one this time last year: Michael Jackson's This Is It































































































































































Pos.FilmWeekend GrossWeekTotal UK Gross
1Saw 3D
£3,600,0831£3,600,083
2Despicable Me£2,581,0733





















































£15,069,277
3Paranormal Activity 2

£1,845,3372































































£8,298,602
4Red£1,184,3442































































£4,340,958
5The Social Network£1,070,4113











































































£7,868,168
6Burke and Hare
£942,8941£942,894
7Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga'Hoole£502,9512

























































£2,183,353
8Alpha and Omega£458,8122















































































£2,007,219
9The Kids Are All Right
£411,9601









































































£411,960
10Vampires Suck£313,9113













































































£2,990,692


Incoming...

Legendary British horror studio Hammer Films returns to screens this coming Friday with vampire thriller Let Me In (cert. 15), which is of course a remake of the acclaimed Swedish horror Let The Right One In (2008).

Meanwhile if you're a little warn out after Halloween and want something a little lighter you could opt for Todd Phillips' new comedy Due Date (cert. 15) or Jackass 3D (cert. 18), and if it's a good bit of British drama you're after there's always Another Year (cert. 12A) from director Mike Leigh.

U.K. Box Office Archive

Monday, November 1, 2010

Thoughts on... Predators (2010)

Predators, 2010.

Directed by Nimród Antal.
Starring Adrien Brody, Laurence Fishburne, Topher Grace, Alica Braga, Walton Goggins, Danny Trejo, Mahershalalhashbaz Ali, Oleg Taktarov and Louis Ozawa Changchien.

Predators
SYNOPSIS:

A small group of humans find themselves on a hostile extraterrestrial world which acts as a game preserve for the merciless alien species known as the Predators.

Predators Adrien Brody
There’s a moment in Terminator: Salvation when a young Kyle Reese sits atop a building, tentatively stretching his head above the roof’s surrounding wall to watch a lone Terminator patrolling the street below. His behaviour is much like my own as a child watching the first and second Terminator films; the single, relentless menace terrified me. Shortly after, however, the Terminator lays in pieces around the street. Barely 20 minutes in and the Terminator are disregarded as fallible. No longer a singular force, submerged in the entire machine army, the Terminator was no longer scary.

Terminator, in my head at least, is interconnected with both the Alien and Predator franchises. Actors and directors overlap and entwine, particularly in the case of the latter two. All three have succumbed to the numbers game: Terminator in the example above, Alien with its immediate sequel Aliens, and most recently, suffering the same pluralisation, Predator with Predators.

The original Predator was terrifying (and cool) precisely because it featured a sole antagonist. That strange jungle was made so alien because it joined with the singular Predator and became it. The trouble with Predators is that it contains three of them, the terror diminishing with each addition. Of course, the franchise needs variations or the ‘one-predator-versus-team-of-humans’ formula will stagnate. But to do it in such an uninterested way makes the beasts themselves nothing more than background noise.

We are hurled into the narrative much like the human characters are. The film opens with Royce (Adrien Brody + muscles and a husky voice) hurtling through the air, just having been released from an unseen plane. He freefalls into a jungle, his parachute opening at the last second. There he comes across other humans (read: action movie/ethnic stereotypes) to form a rag-tag bunch trying to figure out “what the fuck” is going on, “who the fuck” are you, and “where the fuck” are we?

The humans are diverse - a Yakuza (Louis Ozawa Changchien), Eric from That 70s Show, a Cartel member (Danny Trejo), a Sierra-Leone death squad executioner (Mahershalalhashbaz Ali, hellava name) – though helpfully, they all speak fluent English. Why have they been chosen? Surely not for political correctness. You see, they are all as much predators as the alien race themselves. It’s all in the interest of good sport. A battle for the humans to survive and escape ensues as they are hunted across the game preserve by a team of three Predators. Contestants, ready…

The film is enjoyable, very enjoyable, but it feels as though there was a much better film left behind at the pre-production phase. The narrative trundles along from action set piece to light relief to tension and round again at an incredibly superficial level. This, of course, is what these films are meant to do and is why we love them, but the yearning comes from its unrealised potential, that it could have been a much better film. Imagine if certain plot points were given a little more gravitas. For instance, when they first behold the alien worlds crowding the sky - their realisation that they’re on a planet other than Earth, a game reserve for the Predator race, needs only a more delicate foregrounding to achieve the much needed emphasis. Nearly every intriguing idea the film has is met with anticlimax.

And there are many of them. The mythology surrounding the predator race is built upon and teased. The notion that the ‘Predators’ title refers as much to the human characters as the ugly beasts themselves. An entire planet as a game preserve, populated with creatures from across the universe, increasing the mystery surrounding the Predator race’s power. But they are all blunted by the film’s artificial and disorientated world. Some of the visual effects are slightly worse than a Playstation 2 cut-scene.

DVD Notes - On the one-disc edition I watched there was but one special feature, not in keeping with the strength-in-numbers manner of the film. A motion comic, or a half-arsed animation, that details how the Predators prepare their game reserve. Quite interesting, but equally disappointing.

Oli Davis

Movie Review Archive