Monday, August 31, 2009

Walt Disney Company acquires Marvel Entertainment

Worldwide leader in family entertainment agrees to acquire Marvel and its portfolio of over 5,000 characters...

From a press release, issued today by Disney:

Burbank, CA and New York, NY, August 31, 2009 —Building on its strategy of delivering quality branded content to people around the world, The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS) has agreed to acquire Marvel Entertainment, Inc. (NYSE:MVL) in a stock and cash transaction, the companies announced today.

Under the terms of the agreement and based on the closing price of Disney on August 28, 2009, Marvel shareholders would receive a total of $30 per share in cash plus approximately 0.745 Disney shares for each Marvel share they own. At closing, the amount of cash and stock will be adjusted if necessary so that the total value of the Disney stock issued as merger consideration based on its trading value at that time is not less than 40% of the total merger consideration.

Based on the closing price of Disney stock on Friday, August 28, the transaction value is $50 per Marvel share or approximately $4 billion.

"This transaction combines Marvel's strong global brand and world-renowned library of characters including Iron Man, Spider-Man, X-Men, Captain America, Fantastic Four and Thor with Disney's creative skills, unparalleled global portfolio of entertainment properties, and a business structure that maximizes the value of creative properties across multiple platforms and territories," said Robert A. Iger, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Walt Disney Company. "Ike Perlmutter and his team have done an impressive job of nurturing these properties and have created significant value. We are pleased to bring this talent and these great assets to Disney."

"We believe that adding Marvel to Disney's unique portfolio of brands provides significant opportunities for long-term growth and value creation," Iger said.

"Disney is the perfect home for Marvel's fantastic library of characters given its proven ability to expand content creation and licensing businesses," said Ike Perlmutter, Marvel's Chief Executive Officer. "This is an unparalleled opportunity for Marvel to build upon its vibrant brand and character properties by accessing Disney's tremendous global organization and infrastructure around the world."

Under the deal, Disney will acquire ownership of Marvel including its more than 5,000 Marvel characters. Mr. Perlmutter will oversee the Marvel properties, and will work directly with Disney's global lines of business to build and further integrate Marvel's properties.

AICN are posting updates on the story, including rumours that Pixar may be involved in future adaptations and confirmation that existing distribution deals with studios will remain in place, but with Disney planning to self-distribute some time in the future...

British Cinema: The Maggie (1954)

The Maggie, 1954.

Directed by Alexander Mackendrick.
Starring Alex Mackenzie, Paul Douglas and Tommy Kearins.


SYNOPSIS:

An old run-down puffer boat the ‘Maggie’ carries a loveable yet reckless reputation, only surpassed by her crafty old master Captain Mactaggart. When Mactaggart gets hold of an expensive cargo by chance, their journey ahead will be anything but plain sailing.

The Maggie Ealing Comedy
The Maggie is a forgotten gem in the long list of Ealing Studios' classic movies, made in an era commonly regarded as the ‘Golden Age’ of British Cinema. The infectious storyline reels the viewer in immediately when the ‘Maggie’ pulls into harbour at Glasgow. The coast guards speak of her cunning master Captain Mactaggart and the recent trouble he found himself in. The Maggie’s engineer warns Mactaggart they should have arrived in Glasgow at night to avoid being caught by Mactaggart’s sister Sarah, the rightful owner of the archaic puffer. Mactaggart responds in his usual relaxed manner, “they will never come looking for us in the day, they won’t expect it.” An air of mischief and trickery surrounds the Captain and the Maggie herself. This notion of harmless misbehavior is the spine that runs through the entire film.

Additionally in this scene Mactaggart bellows instructions at Dougy (Tommy Kearins) the ship’s boy, who follows orders with no resentment whatsoever. Dougy’s obedience is exemplary of one the strongest themes in the film; loyalty. The boy is totally committed to the Captain and the Maggie, no matter how harshly he is treated. Even when Mactaggart (who is also prone to an afternoon pint or two) leaves the boy to pay for his drinks, Dougy literally fights a man defending his Captain’s name.

Mactaggart is on the verge of having his beloved ship shut down when he tricks the incompetent Pusey into entrusting him with an expensive cargo owned by American transport tycoon Calvin B. Marshall (Paul Douglas). The Maggie is barely in a fit enough state to carry her crew, let alone a cargo worth thousands of pounds, but Pusey mistakes a well-kept ship for the Maggie. Mactaggart is only too happy to go along with this fortunate mix up “it seems there’s been a wee bit of a misunderstanding” he says with a cheeky smile. As well as highlighting the warmly deceiving nature of the Captain, these two incidents reveal another one of his many traits; he is an opportunist.

When the cargo’s owner Marshall tries to track down the Maggie and retrieve his cargo, a hilarious game of cat and mouse begins. Mactaggart pulls out bluff after bluff and even when Marshall personally boards the Maggie, Mactaggart uses his wit, lovable smile and any opportunity he gets to keep the cargo on board. Another strong undercurrent of The Maggie is tradition against modernization; The Maggie being a symbol of tradition struggling to cope with Marshall and the demands of modern shipping. Marshall is also a compelling character and a likeable person, but he is someone who is not at peace with himself. Marshall intends to bring the cargo to his brand new holiday home in attempt to rekindle his strained marriage. Under the surface of Marshall’s predicament there is a sense of materialism (the cargo) being at odds with the more important things in life, such as seeing your loved ones and being content with yourself

The Maggie
is a beautiful blend of charismatic characters, witty humour and an engaging storyline. In an age where blockbuster movies with over-the-top special effects and weak storylines dominate the box office, it is reassuring to watch a film with a truly original screenplay. Mactaggart, Dougy and Marshall are three of the strongest characters I have ever seen in a film, whilst The Maggie’s underlying themes are tactfully executed without being forced upon the viewer. During a particular scene a journalist describes the old puffer boats as a “national treasure” and personally I could not think of a more appropriate way to describe The Maggie.

Tom Conran

Sunday, August 30, 2009

I Sat Through That? #8 - M. Night Shyamalan

In which Gerry Hayes wonders just who it is that keeps giving money to M. Night Shyamalan...

M. NIGHT SHYAMALAN

Something a little different this week. Last week, as I bitched and moaned about Unbreakable, I noted that I could do a series on the films of M. Night Shyamalan. I won’t subject you to that but I thought I’d take a look at three films here in one column.

If you’re daft enough to care, there will be spoilers.

The Happening M Night ShyamalanTHE HAPPENING (2008)

Bad-mouthing The Happening is like shooting giant sea-turtles in a barrel. There’s just so much that’s wrong with it that it’s hard to even know where to start. Even the film’s tagline is so achingly awful that makes your teeth cry: We’ve Sensed It. We’ve Seen The Signs. Now... It’s Happening.

What there is of a story concerns our old friend, Mark Wahlberg. He plays Elliot Moore, a high-school science teacher that seems never to have taken a science class in his life - when a student answers a science question with ‘an act of nature’ (a meaningless, non-answer to anything) Elliot says ‘nice answer... science will come up with some reason to put in the books but it’ll be just a theory... we will fail to acknowledge there are forces at work beyond our understanding’. What? That’s not a science class, idiot. Elliot’s class seems one where they ‘teach the controversy’. One where science seems not to matter and moronic tosh of ‘mysterious ways beyond our ken’ is pummelled into its place.

Before he can move on to Advanced Sasquatch Anatomy, Elliot’s class is interrupted by the principal. He tells them ‘there appears to be an event happening’. Hearing this line on the trailer, before I’d even seen the film, was enough to convince me of its worth.

The event that appears to be happening, for those that don’t know, is that people all over the place get a bit dopey and then kill themselves in inventive fashion. Elliot and his missus, along with some others, flee the city.

Along the way, Elliot (the science teacher) learns, from a guy who sells shrubs, that trees can talk to bushes and that all the plants have been conspiring to kill humans by making people a bit stupid and suicidal. Armed with this knowledge, and his extensive science background, Elliot leads his band through an incongruously-placed shooting incident and further into the realm of the killer trees.

Luckily, we discover from a shoe-horned-in TV scientist that the danger will pass at (the very precise time of) nine o’clock next morning. Elliot has survived. The danger is passed. Or is it? Perhaps, in a few months, at some easily recognisable, international landmark an event will, once again, appear to happen.

Utter drivel.

Signs M Night ShyamalanSIGNS (2002)

Worst. Aliens. Ever.

Seriously. Aliens who make mysterious crop circles that announce their presence (and certainly not the presence of two half-pissed old geezers with a plank and some string) while at the same time skulking around on the roof. And what were they doing on the roof? They’ve mastered interstellar travel but need to peer in windows like space-perverts? Aliens so advanced that a redneck farmer can trap them in the pantry? Aliens that communicate on the same frequency that a baby-monitor uses? Aliens that can be killed by water? Useless, little green bastards.

But, of course, Shyamalan had to crowbar the water thing in there, didn’t he. He’s got a bit of a thing about water, has ol’ M. Fine, we get it, water. Can you stop now?

And while we’re on the subject, possibly the most absurd, half-baked idea (in a film full of them) was when Mel Gibson’s (as the less-than-reverend Hess) family heard the news that a method of defeating the aliens had been discovered but that reports were sketchy and there was little detail. IT’S WATER! Water. It’s not like the report would have required transmission of some complicated chemical formulae. Water. Why didn’t it just say ‘water kills them’? Why?

Once Mel and the gang knew though, well then they were able to make use of all those glasses of water that had, fortuitously, been placed throughout the house without so much as a lampshade on them.

Utter drivel.

The Village M Night ShyamalanTHE VILLAGE (2004)

The least egregious of the three, but don’t be fooled into thinking that The Village is actually any good.

Jaoquin Phoenix plays Lucius, an arsehole who lives in a tiny village in a clearing in the woods in the 19th century. Nobody’s allowed to go into the woods as the adults say that there are monsters there. Lucius cares not a jot and after wandering in a few, cautious, yards, he seems to incur the wrath of the monsters who, under cover of night, slaughter livestock and paint red crosses on some doors. Ooooooh.

To make matters worse, Lucius is involved in a love-triangle with the local blind girl and the local idiot. Idiot stabs Lucius and, wouldn’t you know, the blind girl decides to go to get the special ‘stab medicine’ that can make him better. But, she has to go in the woods. Ooooooh.

Making her way through the woods, and mostly avoiding holes, she finds a road. And, oh heavens, a car. An actual automobile. It’s not the 19th century after all. Shyamalan, that wily trickster, has fooled us all. Really the village is just in the middle of a private woods. It was set up by a bunch of rich guys that didn’t like the violence of the modern world so they raised their kids in a forest populated by monsters that terrify them and slaughter livestock. Flawless.

The monsters aren’t real though. It’s just the grown-ups dressed up, traumatising their children to keep them safe.

We’re even told that these guys are so rich they can have air-traffic patterns diverted so that planes will not fly in the sky visible from the village, lest the children see. Personally, I’d have thought that, if they can convince the kids that a monster lives in the woods, they could probably have spun them a yarn about sky-sprites or something, but that’s probably why I’m not a rich chancer.

Ooooooh.

Oddly, The Village isn’t utter drivel. I actually quite enjoyed it for a bit. If it had continued in the ‘something in the woods’ vein, it could have been a good film. It was nicely atmospheric and had a suspenseful, eerie feel. But he had to put in the twist, didn’t he. Here, especially, it feels like a twist for twist’s sake and it ruins the film.

~~~

It’s turned out to be a little longer than usual, this week but you did get three for the price of one. Odds are pretty good that, when I can’t think of a topic next week, I’ll be kicking myself. How will I ever find another bad film to whinge about? Woe is me.

Read more I Sat Through That? right here.

Gerry Hayes is a garret-dwelling writer subsisting on tea, beer and Flame-Grilled Steak flavour McCoy’s crisps. You can read about other stuff he doesn't like on his blog at http://stareintospace.com or you can have easy, bite-sized bits of him at http://twitter.com/gerryhayes

Saturday, August 29, 2009

British Cinema: A Nick Love Profile

Jon Dudley discusses the career of British writer-director Nick Love...

On September 18th this year, a new film about football hooligans will be hitting cinema screens nationwide… The Firm. It is a loose adaptation of an original film written by Al Ashton, and the 2009 release sees Nick Love at the helm. Some of you will be thinking “ah Nick Love, The Football Factory guy… isn’t this bordering on seen-it-before material?” Maybe it is, maybe not so much. One way to investigate is to take a look at Nick Love’s film career…

Although he touches on familiar themes within his films (friendship, loyalty, pride), they vary in content. Love’s first recognised film was a short entitled ‘Love Story’. It focuses on Dave and his partner Sharon who live in near poverty who have just had their first born. It includes familiar issues seen in all of Love’s movies to date – drug use, dodgy cockney ‘geezers’ and easy girls. I for one was particularly shocked at the last shot of the film, Dave, his right hand man and Sharon taking class A drugs whilst one of them is holding the baby. That was perhaps the most emotional part of the film for me, and purely because of the situation the baby was helplessly dragged into. In terms of characters it is clear what Love was trying to do, establish characters that portrayed their back stories by the way they acted, and for the most part he did that successfully, however I did not really feel an emotional attachment to any of them.

Goodbye Charlie BrightLove followed Love Story by writing the adaptation from novel to screen of French drama Mauvaise Passe (1999), which in English means The Escort. Then came his debut feature – a film based on themes such as loyalty and friendship – Goodbye Charlie Bright (2001). I first saw this film after I had seen The Football Factory and The Business, but it is clear that Nick Love has taken many aspects from his debut with him throughout his career. Witty dialogue and the ability to create genuine characters that the audience can relate to (something he must have worked on a lot since Love Story) made Goodbye Charlie Bright a very good film. Jo Berry, a film critic for Empire magazine says “As a debut effort, this is great stuff” and she really isn’t wrong.

The characters in Love’s debut are recognisable. You will be watching it and be thinking to yourself “that character reminds me of…” – this obviously adds to the realistic feel of the film and also to the audience’s enjoyment. The appeal of the film is also how it handles the ‘coming-of-age’ aspect – Charlie clearly has something about him (namely charisma, charm and an instant likability) that could allow him to move on from the estate which occupies his life but his best and lifelong friend Justin keeps holding him back. The interior conflict he suffers because of this is I’m sure something a fair few teenagers out there can relate to.

The Football FactoryThen came a cult British classic… The Football Factory (2004). Based on the John King novel, Love turned this story about football hooligans and rival ‘firms’ into one of the most popular British films of the last decade. Featuring a cast of Nick Love regular Danny Dyer, Frank Harper and Tamer Hassan, The Football Factory has become a favourite with audiences – DVD sales alone in the U.K are reaching towards the 2million mark.

The Football Factory is about two rival firms (representing Millwall and Chelsea) that eventually meet head to head in what turns out to be a fatal battle for pride and victory. For those of you reading this that haven’t seen this film I will not reveal all but say that the ending really hooked me in and I felt emotionally drained as the credits started rolling. Although I felt a slight emotional tweak at the end of Love Story, and indeed a far more happier one at the conclusion of Goodbye Charlie Bright, it was clear as soon as The Football Factory ended that Love was able to create emotionally engaging characters and tense drama in his films. And he then went on to create one of my favourite British film characters in his next project.

The BusinessThe Business (2005) was Love’s follow up to The Football Factory. Danny Dyer and Tamer Hassan teamed up with him again to produce yet another cult classic on the British film circuit – and creating one of my favourite characters, “the Kid” Frankie. At the start of the film Frankie says, “My old man wrote me a letter from prison once. It said if you don't want to end up in here, stay away from crime, women and drugs”. Then, after the film has played out, Frankie repeats this then ends it with “…well what a load of bollocks that turned out to be. I tried them all, and won, and drove off into the sunset”. It was at that point I realised that Frankie was ‘The Man’! A friend of mine even based his wardrobe for his summer holiday to Ibiza on Frankie’s gear in the film – which mainly consisted on white old-skool Fila garms!

The film itself, and not just Frankie, is a delight from start to finish. It has been compared to American classic Scarface because of the similar story arcs, and Nick Love directly acknowledges that with a shot of a palm tree against a sunset that then turns out to be a painting – referencing the same shot used in Scarface. Again strong willed cockney wide-boys feature heavily, and look to dominate the drug import/export links in the Costa-Del-Sol. Some critics have said that Danny Dyer can only play one dimensional cockney gangster characters, and I can see where they are coming from when they say this, but again a certain X-factor (similar to what Paul Nicholls’ Charlie had in Goodbye Charlie Bright) makes you instantly warm to his character in this film. It is now at this point in his career that I feel Nick Love knew his skills and was at the top of his game – creating stories and characters that appealed to wide British audiences and involved the viewers more.

OutlawTwo years later, Love wrote and directed Outlaw, linking up with Danny Dyer for a third time in three successive films. This film again featured lots of violence and gangs of people standing up for what they believe in. Love yet again creates very passionate characters, something of a clear trait of his; characters that have a belief and want to fight for it too. Gang and friendship loyalty are at the forefront of the characters minds, just like in The Football Factory, and I’m sure we will be seeing that in The Firm when it hits cinemas next month...

The Firm follows Dom (Calum McNab), who fast becomes involved in the fierce rivalry between different football firms. However when he has a change of heart and wants no more, it proves to be a situation that’s easier to get in to than out of. Which leads me back to a point I made at the start of this article – is this one of those ‘been there, done that’ situations? There is only one way to find out. The Firm is released September 18th. And yes it features many similar aspects as The Football Factory, but surely Nick Love wouldn’t repeat himself… would he? I will be going to see this film, I encourage you to do the same.

Watch The Firm trailer.

Jon Dudley is a freelance film and television journalist and his 17-minute short film Justification was shown at the 2009 Cannes Film Festival.

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Bringing Star Wars to the Screen: Episode IV - A New Hope

In the first of a new series of articles examining the various screen incarnations of George Lucas’ Star Wars saga, we focus on the development of original 1977 classic Star Wars…

Star Wars: Episode IV – A New Hope, 1977.

Directed by George Lucas.
Starring Mark Hamill, Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, Peter Cushing and Alec Guinness.

Star Wars Poster 1977
SYNOPSIS:

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away… young farm boy Luke Skywalker becomes embroiled in a civil war between the heroic Rebellion and evil Galactic Empire. Setting off from his home-world, Luke must rescue a captured princess and learn the ways of the Force from Jedi Master Obi-Wan Kenobi if he is to aid the Rebellion in destroying the Empire’s ultimate weapon, the Death Star.


During the production of his debut movie THX-1138 (1971), young director George Lucas had expressed considerable interested in adapting the adventures of Flash Gordon for the big screen but, after being unable to acquire the rights to the character, Lucas soon set about developing his own space adventure reminiscent of the science-fiction movie serials he had watched as a child. Drawing inspiration not only from Flash Gordon but also the works of Edgar Rice Burroughs and Akira Kurosawa, Lucas began crafting his world and in early 1973 he produced the Journal of the Whills, a 40-page outline that began with the phrase: “This is the story of Mace Windu, a revered Jedi Bendu of Ophuchi who was related to Usby CJ Thape, Padawan learner to the famed Jedi”. This outline would serve as the basis for the first draft of his screenplay, which Lucas produced under the working title of The Star Wars.

Following the production of his second feature American Graffiti in 1973 Lucas offered The Star Wars to Universal and United Artists (who both passed on the option) before meeting with Alan Ladd Jr., then Head of Creative Affairs at 20th Century Fox. Ladd was impressed by a private screening of American Graffiti and was immediately drawn to Lucas’ vision, offering a deal to the filmmaker to write and direct the picture for $150,000. However, following the release and subsequent box-office and critical success of American Graffiti Lucas was able to renegotiate his deal to gain control of the merchandising and sequel rights, which Fox happily conceded in the belief that these would be of little value in the long-term.

While Lucas’ early treatment and screenplays contained many familiar names and locations, it was not until he had signed the first deal with Fox that the eventual narrative began to take shape. Lucas had felt that his newly created universe was “a good concept in search of a story”, and after discovering the work of mythologist Joseph Campbell – including Campbell’s The Hero With A Thousand Faces (1949) and Myths to Live By (1972) – he decided to focus the narrative on the journey of the hero, Luke Starkiller. He later reflected on this influence in The Hero’s Journey – Joseph Campbell on his Life and Works (1990), stating that “it was The Hero With A Thousand Faces that just took what was about 500 pages and said, here is the story, here’s the end, here’s the focus, here’s the way it’s all laid out.”

By early 1976 Lucas was satisfied his screenplay and, after holding joint casting sessions with close friend Brian De Palma for both Star Wars and Carrie (1976), had cast his leads. Young TV actor Mark Hamill was brought in as Luke (now renamed Skywalker) alongside Carrie Fisher as Princess Leia, with the actress beating off stiff competition from the likes of Jodie Foster and Amy Irving to secure the part. For the role of Han Solo, American Graffiti actor Harrison Ford had been strongly favoured by casting director Fred Roos and, although Lucas had initially rejected the idea, he soon became convinced of Ford’s suitability. Realising that Fox would be concerned about the lack of ‘star-power’ Lucas then turned to respected British actor Alec Guinness for the pivotal role of Luke’s mentor Obi Wan Kenobi and cast him alongside fellow veteran Peter Cushing, with much of the remaining supporting cast – such as Anthony Daniels, Peter Mayhew and David Prowse – hired once the production had moved to London.

Photography on Star Wars commenced March 22nd, 1976 on location in Tunisia before moving to Elstree Studios in London, with Lucasfilm hiring the entire facility for the remainder of the four-month shoot. The production pushed Lucas, the cast and crew to the very limit from the off. A rainstorm in Tunisia - the first of its kind in over fifty years - destroyed sets and equipment just days into the shoot, while many suffered from sunburn and dysentery. After moving to London Lucas also clashed with the British crew and director of photography Gilbert Taylor, who insisted they work to strict employment regulations including mandatory breaks and maximum working times, leading to the production falling behind schedule.

Difficulties continued through into post-production as Lucas’ newly formed Industrial Light & Magic struggled to make progress with the groundbreaking visual effects and the director was eventually hospitalised with hypertension and exhaustion. Declaring that Star Wars would be his final directorial film, Lucas screened an unfinished version of the film in early 1977 to a select group of friends that included De Palma, Steven Spielberg and John Milius. While Spielberg later suggested that he was the only person at the screening to have enjoyed the film (De Palma in particular had been highly critical), Lucas was soon buoyed by the reaction of Fox executives and the preview audience who attended the first public screening of the now completed film on April 30th at the Northpoint Theater in Los Angeles.

Looking to avoid the criticism that he felt would accompany the film’s release, Lucas and his then-wife Marcia flew to Hawaii while Star Wars opened quietly on May 25th, 1977 to only 32 screens. Despite this rather low-key release, it went on to gross a then-record $2.8m in its first week and critics fell over themselves to laud the film as a masterpiece of entertainment. With positive word-of-mouth spreading like wildfire, Star Wars soon dominated at cinemas around the globe and the studio’s share value skyrocketed as the film’s unprecedented success saw it march to the top of the all-time box office. Star Wars was nominated for nine Academy Awards and was successful in six of the technical categories, although Lucas lost out to Woody Allen in the Best Director and Best Picture categories with Annie Hall (1977). The film’s merchandising was equally – if not more so – successful, and with Lucas owning the rights, his life was soon changed forever.

It is easy to see why Star Wars proved so popular with audiences and critics. A timeless story of good against evil, Lucas provides a textbook example of narrative structure and his meticulous revisions and attention to detail help shape a truly believable fantasy world filled with iconic heroes and villains. The simplicity of the plot – a young farm hand who yearns for adventure only to find himself rising up as the heroic saviour of the galaxy – is immediately accessible and the film excels in providing escapist entertainment to both children and adults alike. John Williams’ enduring musical score perfectly captures the emotion and drama of the film and the mind-blowing visual effects were unlike anything that had come before. Its influence is also far-reaching, encompassing not only filmmakers such as James Cameron, Ridley Scott, Peter Jackson, Roland Emmerich and Kevin Smith, but also Hollywood thinking in general, with the ‘high concept’ summer blockbuster born as a reaction to the success of both Star Wars and Spielberg’s Jaws (1975). While Lucas was never fully satisfied with the final film - going as far as to release a Special Edition with enhanced visual effects and additional scenes in 1997 - Star Wars proved to be a pop-culture phenomenon that launched a billion-dollar franchise, and one to which Lucas would devote much of his later career.

Bringing Star Wars to the Screen: Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back
Bringing Star Wars to the Screen: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi
Bringing Star Wars to the Small Screen: Caravan of Courage - An Ewok Adventure
Bringing Star Wars to the Small Screen: The Star Wars Holiday Special
Bringing Star Wars to the Small Screen: Ewoks - Battle For Endor
Bringing Star Wars to the Small Screen: The Ewoks and Droids Adventure Hour

Gary Collinson

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

World Cinema: Let the Right One In (2008)

Let the Right One In, 2008.

Directed by Tomas Alfredson.
Starring Kåre Hedebrant, Lina Leandersson and Per Ragnar.

Let the Right One In poster
SYNOPSIS:

A 12-year-old outcast who is frequently picked on by his classmates dreams of getting his revenge, and with the arrival of his new next-door neighbour, he may finally have found a friend, ally, and first love.

Let the Right One In
[SPOILERS AHEAD]

2009 has been a pretty good year for vampires. A few months after thousands of twelve year olds around the globe swooned over the poster-perfect adolescents that vogued their way through Twilight, a slightly more mature audience went equally as mental over Tomas Alfredson’s vampire movie for the slightly more discerning cinema goer.

Let the Right One In is an adaptation of the John Ajvide Lindqvist novel of the same title. It tells the story of Oskar, a lonely twelve year old living in suburban Stockholm in the 1980s who befriends Eli, a vampire seemingly the same age as him who moves into the flat next door. The two of them form a friendship that provides solace for the pair of them, as Eli battles with the guilt that results from her blood thirsty nature and Oskar deals with the frustrations of bullying, the separation from his father and feeling isolated in a world where no-one seems to understand or appreciate him.

Boo bloody hoo. Please excuse me whilst I try and swallow the bulging lump in my throat and wipe a tear from my welling eyes. Judging by the number of reviewers that not only sang the praises of this film, but wrote their own mini opera in fervent celebration of what has been referred to as the ‘best foreign language film of the year’, I’m guessing that there were indeed quite a few tears shed over the ‘sweet, cute, innocent and gentle’ relationship between boy and vampire. I however, remained dry eyed from start to finish. After forcing myself through a second viewing to see if I could catch even a momentary glimpse of what apparently everyone was wetting both their eyes and their pants over, I continued to be completely baffled as to why this movie was repeatedly having ten, eleven, twelve and probably even a hundred stars thrown at it by every single person who had seen it. One reviewer even said ‘I was moved beyond my ability to wholly put how it made me feel into words.’ Yeah, so was I. Mainly because I was too busy choking on my own disbelief that this film was being hailed one of the cinematic masterpieces of the year.

Ok, so I wonder how many enemies I’ve made already. It’s ok guys, you can stop waving your middle finger at your computer screen, I didn’t think it was all bad. In fact, I really didn’t think it was a bad film, just entirely average. It was more entertaining than say, staring at a shelf of envelopes whilst you wait in an hour long queue at the post office, and probably more fun than doing a non-calculator maths exam, but on reading numerous reviews that mainly consisted of critics getting right up the films metaphorical arse and snuggling in its small intestine, I was more than a little confused as to why it was getting so much attention. So my opinions are mainly driven by huge sense of mystification over these rave reviews, not hate for a dreadful film. Ok, maybe a little bit of hate. Just a smidgen. This small amount hate began a-mustering when I could literally only find one reviewer who had the same kind of indifference towards to the film as I did, and even then his main criticism was that it didn’t make any sense, which unless you’re non-Swedish speaking and watching it without subtitles, this just shouldn’t be the case. The film isn’t confusing, it’s just is a bit slow which I didn’t have a problem with, in fact I thought the pace of it worked reasonably well. The whole slowness of it was enhanced by the cinematography with its long takes of the wintry Swedish landscape, and I also liked how some of the shots were cleverly multilayered in order to isolate certain characters away from others. Oh and it had cats in it. I like cats.

However, I did find myself getting a bit bored with it all, mainly because I found it so hard to care about any of the characters. Please see fig 1. for a pictorial representation of this boredom.



Fig 1. This is the result of the moment, about a third of the way through my second viewing of the film, when my left hand, a black marker and a crumpled bit of paper became far more interesting than what was on the screen before me.






The majority of its fans harped on about how unique it was, which I can kind of see at first, but once you get over the fact that the blood-hungry subject of the film and her new companion/boyfriend/possible next meal are both children, I don’t think there’s much originality left. He’s a lonely, bullied odd-kid who lives in the middle of nowhere and has parents that don’t really have much time for him, she’s a vampire that suffers from post neck-chomp guilt, and then of course there are the inhabitants of the surrounding area who are ‘onto them.’ I found it all quite achingly predictable from the first moment she appears ragged and barefoot in the snow, being all eerie and giving Oskar the old ‘I can’t be friends with you’ line which we all know means the exact opposite. She might as well have said, ‘Good evening. For the purpose of maintaining the inevitable ominous nature of our first meeting, I will momentarily pretend that I can never be associated with you. But just to give you a heads up, we will in fact be best of buds by this time tomorrow. Then you will give me your Rubik’s Cube as a gift after I tell you I’ve never received any presents before as surprise surprise, I don’t know how old I am or when my birthday is. Will I have inexplicably solved this almost impossible puzzle by the time I return it to you the following day? I course I fucking will. Pleased to meet you.’

Maybe it’s just me, perhaps I’m just an emotionally vacant android with a lump of concrete instead of a heart, but I really didn’t believe the relationship between these two. As well as feeling quite frustrated at the end by the quite easy and unsatisfying conclusion in which Eli returns to save Oskar from the bullies like we all knew she would, I was also left feeling quite cold and detached from it all. Kind of like the feeling you get when there’s nothing on T.V, so you end up watching a documentary about some bloke you’ve never heard of who was from a place you never even knew existed and did something vaguely heroic during a war you never realised had even taken place. That sort of cold and detached. I did find the relationship between Eli and Hakan, the peculiar older man that she lives with in her dank flat slightly more interesting. Who was he? Her father? Her slave? A former childhood friend who has now grown up and can’t separate himself from her? I guess we’ll never find out seeing as she ripped out his throat and threw him out a window half way through the film. As for Oskar and Eli, I was pretty much just sick of looking at the pair of them by the end of the film and was almost hoping she would eat her snivelling little pal, before turning her blood encrusted gob on herself, gradually gnawing away at her own limbs until she was just a head and torso rolling around in the pretty white snow. At least she would be more interesting to look at than when she’s skulking around with one facial expression like she is for the rest of the film.

At the end we see Oskar and a big wooden box sat on train. Where are the boy and his contained vampire friend going? I have no idea, and as long as they don’t make the return journey for the sequel I really couldn’t care less.

Amy Flinders

Adult Swimathon - Robot Chicken Premiere / Seth Green Q&A

Curzon Midnight Movies presents Adult Swimathon: Robot Chicken Premiere and Seth Green Live Q&A via webcast...

Curzon Midnight Movies are teaming up with popular cable channel Adult Swim and the London International Animation Festival to present a night of titillating, shocking and absurd animations on the big screen tomorrow, Friday 28th August from 9.30pm.

The night includes the premiere of Robot Chicken Season 2 on DVD, along with a live Q&A via webcast with Robot Chicken creator Seth Green. Also on the menu are a special selection of freaky animations as a taster for the LIAF (which starts on 31st Aug) plus free Robot Chicken gifts, chicken snacks and live music from DJ John Pique.

The event takes place at Curzon Soho, 99 Shaftesbury Avenue, London W1D 5DY, and tickets are priced at £12 (£9 members). The box office number is 0871 7033 988.

Robot Chicken Season 2 DVDMeanwhile season 2 of the toy murderin’, attention-span shatterin’ TV series comes to DVD on the 28th September 2009. A special edition box-set containing seasons 1, 2 and the never-seen-before season 3 will also be available, featuring an impressive list of vocal talent from creator Seth Green and a slew of regular guest stars such as Seth McFarlane (Family Guy), Scarlett Johansson, Ashton Kutcher, Zac Efron, Vince Vaughan, Snoop Dogg and Christian Slater.

Highlights of Season 2 include Lindsay Lohan entering the world of Highlander and decapitating Hilary Duff, Bugs Bunny goes Hip Hop with Porky Pig, Elmer Fudd and Dr Dre make a comic nod to 8 Mile, George Bush discovers he has Jedi powers, The Foo Fighters forge an unlikely alliance (with who?) and tribute is paid to Michael Jackson in a zombie Thriller show down...

Check out our review of Star Wars: Robot Chicken Episode II.

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Teen Spirit: A John Hughes Profile (Part 1)

Trevor Hogg profiles the career of legendary writer, director and producer John Hughes in the first of a two-part feature...

Tired of their infantile portrayal in the movies, Chicago-based filmmaker John Hughes became the voice of a generation of teenagers by treating them like adults.
John Hughes
“I was kind of quiet,” recalled the director of his childhood in Lansing, Michigan. “I grew up in a neighborhood that was mostly girls and old people. There weren't any boys my age, so I spent a lot of time by myself, imagining things. And every time we would get established somewhere, we would move. Life just started to get good in seventh grade, and then we moved to Chicago. I ended up in a really big high school, and I didn't know anybody. And then Bob Dylan's Bringing It All Back Home came out and really changed me. Thursday I was one person, and Friday I was another. My heroes were Dylan, John Lennon and Picasso, because they each moved their particular medium forward, and when they got to the point where they were comfortable, they always moved on. I liked them at a time when I was in a pretty conventional high school, where the measure of your popularity was athletic ability. And I'm not athletic - I've always hated team sports.”

Oddly, enough the creator of such adolescent benchmarks as Sixteen Candles (1984), The Breakfast Club (1985) and Ferris Bueller’s Day Off (1986) was unsentimental about his student days at Glenbrook North. "High school was not this key point in my life," remarked John Hughes. "It wasn’t traumatic. Basically, it was over real quick." When pushed to describe himself when he was the age of his film characters, Hughes responded, “I always preferred to hang out with the outcasts, 'cause they were cooler; they had better taste in music, for one thing, I guess because they had more time to develop one with the lack of social interaction they had!” The moviemaker went on to add, "People ask me, ‘Were you the geek?’ No, I wasn’t. ‘So which one were you?’ I don’t get it. Who was Alfred Hitchcock in his movies? Janet Leigh? Did anyone even ask him? But I get asked, so I make up an answer."

After graduating, John Hughes attended art school at the University of Arizona; he did not stay there long as the undergrad discovered another passion which caused him to trade in his paint brush – writing and mailing unsolicited jokes to comedians. "I'd start out with Rodney Dangerfield, then move down to Norm Crosby," he stated. The experience proved to be so enjoyable that when the aspiring humorist returned to Chicago he talked himself into a job at DDB Needham Worldwide, and married his high school sweetheart, Nancy Ludwig. In the span of seven years the advertising wunderkind went from being an ad copywriter at Needham to becoming the creative director of the Leo Burnett agency at the age of 27. “Advertising was fairly simple work,” the moviemaker fondly recollected, “and I really just wanted a job where I could sit and write every day and not get fired for it like I had at other jobs, but it was fun.”

Even with his success, Hughes felt like something was amiss in his life. "I thought,” he related, “what if I'm 65 and retired with all my stocks, my profit-sharing, my money, and I'm sitting on the porch, thinking, 'I should have been a writer - I wonder if I could have done it.'" With the support of his wife, the young advertising executive went to work for the National Lampoon magazine. Upon reflecting about his dramatic career decision, the director replied, "It was real hard to leave. I had a kid and another one on the way. I was rising, doing great, but I just had to try this, and I needed primary access to my time. I couldn't bring myself to screw the agency by working on their time, so I took a severe cut in pay and gave myself three years to make it. I figured, in three years, if I blew it completely, I could still go beg for my old job back."

Good fortune arrived with the box office hit Animal House (1978), which suddenly made National Lampoon writers a hot commodity in Hollywood. John Hughes was signed to a film development deal with Paramount. Unlike his time in the advertising industry, success did not come quickly to the rookie screenwriter. Hughes wrote episodes for the promptly cancelled television version of Animal House; he also collaborated on a Jaws sequel, satirically titled Jaws: 3, People: 0, and The History of Ohio from the Beginning of Time to the End of the Universe, neither of them would make it to the big screen.

National Lampoons Vacation posterThe bad luck ended in 1983 when John Hughes wrote National Lampoon’s Vacation, which starred Chevy Chase as the clueless father and husband who takes his family on a disastrous summer holiday. "That was how my family vacationed, tons of kids in the car, things going wrong," said the filmmaker. "These are just simple truths about people and families. I happen to go for the simplest, most ordinary things. The extraordinary doesn't interest me. I'm not interested in psychotics. I'm interested in the person you don't expect to have a story. I like Mr. Everyman." He explained further his inspiration for the film, “In Vacation, I was actually deconstructing Disney. I used to watch The Mickey Mouse Club, those obnoxious, spoiled Mouseketeers you just wanted to beat the tar out of." As Hughes recalled it, "They could do anything! Disneyland after hours? Whatever you want! They'd wear these horse things, and they'd give away giant Tootsie Rolls. My grandmother was diabetic; there was a fear of sugar in my house. I wanted one of those goddamn Tootsie Rolls, I wanted to dance with that horse for a while, I wanted to go to Disneyland. I never got there as a kid and knew I never would."

Mr Mom posterThe other movie written by him that year was about an unemployed dad who gets to look after his offspring while his wife works; the experience of having the script taken out of his control by 20th Century Fox caused John Hughes to become embittered with the Hollywood system. “Mr. Mom was pretty badly butchered,” he bitterly remarked. “I just got raped on the project. It is, in fact, the story of me and my two children. I did the first draft in a day and a half, one sitting.”

Both National Lampoon’s Vacation and Mr. Mom proved to be commercial triumphs. So much so that Universal signed John Hughes to a three-year, $30 million deal which allowed him to direct his next two scripts - Sixteen Candles and The Breakfast Club which made actress Molly Ringwald a star, and introduced movie audiences to the fictional suburban town of Shermer, Illinois.

Read John Hughes' original Vacation story here, or watch a tribute film to commemorate his 1991 Producer of the Year Award from the National Association of Movie Theater Owners.

Continue to part two.

Trevor Hogg is a freelance video editor and writer who currently resides in Canada.

UK Box Office Top Ten - weekend commencing 21/08/09

UK box office top ten and analysis for the weekend of Friday 21st - Sunday 24th August 2009.

Quentin Tarantino's long-gestating World War II 'Men on a Mission' epic Inglourious Basterds jumps straight in at number one, giving the director his biggest ever opening here in the UK and banishing the ghost of his previous effort Death Proof, which opened with a disappointing £400k back in 2007. The film, which was aided by four days of advance screenings, helped to reinvigorate the box office after two slow weeks and pushes last week's number one The Time Traveler's Wife down into second. However, if we discount preview takings then Inglourious Basterds trails both Kill Bill Vol. 1 and Vol. 2 in terms of largest openings for the director (meanwhile his Grindhouse colleague Robert Rodriguez was less fortunate with his latest family flick Shorts opening to a disappointing £173k and failing to crack the top ten).

3D action comedy G-Force jumps back up to third after four weeks on release and has now passed £10m in total receipts, while Aliens in the Attic falls two places to fourth in its second weekend. The year's biggest hit Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince drops once place to fifth and continues to edge towards £50m, while formulaic spoof Dance Flick was a new entry in sixth. G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra and The Ugly Truth both drop two places from last weekend to seventh and eighth, while Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs and The Proposal both fall one spot apiece to round out the chart at the expense of Bandslam and A Perfect Getaway.
















































































Pos.FilmWeekend GrossWeekTotal UK Gross
1Inglourious Basterds
£3,596,4151













£3,596,415
2The Time Traveler's Wife£915,7512



















£3,789,285
3G-Force£654,9094



























£10,562,742
4Aliens in the Attic£642,5222























£2,894,317
5Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince£598,3356



























£48,200,855
6Dance Flick
£462,8251























£462,825
7GI Joe: The Rise of Cobra£455,5363

























£5,050,335
8The Ugly Truth£451,0233

































£5,258,681
9Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs£336,3008



























£33,305,718
10The Proposal£270,6915

































£11,072,485


Incoming...

Two new releases will be looking to challenge for top spot when they open this friday - 3D horror sequel The Final Destination and Judd Apatow's latest comedy Funny People, starring Adam Sandler and Seth Rogen. Also released is Kathryn Bigelow's Iraq War thriller The Hurt Locker and Spanish drama Broken Embraces from writer-director Pedro Almodovar.

U.K. Box Office Archive

Sunday, August 23, 2009

I Sat Through That? #7 - Unbreakable (2000)

In which Gerry Hayes feels a strong urge to break something...

Unbreakable, 2000.

UnbreakableDirected by M. Night Shyamalan.
Starring Bruce Willis, Samuel L. Jackson, Robin Wright Penn.
Written by M. Night Shyamalan.

Right, let’s get this out of the way first: I liked The Sixth Sense. There... happy? I thought it was a, mostly, well constructed and filmed movie with a nice surprise ending. Lots of people agree. That’s all cool.

M. Night Shyamalan seems to think this makes him the King Of The Twist however, and he’s been pegging surprises onto the ends of, otherwise mediocre, films ever since. I could do a series of this column on Shyamalan’s films (and I might) but in the meantime Unbreakable is a reasonable example of what I mean.

Full disclosure: I admit I was momentarily fooled by the twist in Unbreakable. By fooled, I mean that, for a moment, I thought that a ‘clever’ twist made this a good film. For the briefest of seconds, at the end of the film, I thought “hmmmm, not bad”. But then I realised it was bad. I realised that, for the last hour and a half, I’d been bored and annoyed by this film - and it’s not easy to accomplish bored and annoyed at the same time. A twist-ending does not a good film make. This film has a twist ending. It is not a good film.

There may be spoilers hereafter, if ‘spoilers’ can really be applied.

Willis is David Dunn, a brooding, grumpy security guard. As he’s trying to cheat on his wife with a pretty girl, the train he’s on crashes. Everybody dead. Except him.

Then Sam Jackson turns up - dressed mainly as a pimp - playing Elijah Price. Pity poor Elihah as he’s got osteogenesis smurgleflump or something and it makes his bones all brittle - like one of those dog-turds that’s gone white and dry in the sun. One double-take and Elijah’s neck could snap like a twig with brittle-twig disease. The cruel kids in school called him Mr. Glass and used to kick him in the arse just to hear his coccyx snap. He’s also a comic-geek - come on Elijah, surely you can do something to stop getting beat up.

Elijah starts bothering David because he reckons his survival in the train-crash means he’s a superhero. His theory is that if he (Elijah) can be born so fragile, it stands to reason that the exact opposite - an unbreakable person - would also be born to balance things. It seems a poorly thought-out theory to me - if one person is born with a hump, another isn’t born with a massive concave dent in his back - but Elijah’s pretty happy with it.

The joke’s on me though, as it turns out that Elijah’s right and David is superman. He can lift heavy weights and rebond with his wife (Wright-Penn) and son. He never gets a cold and can tell, psychically, when people are naughty. But for the outside-underpants, David is a living, breathing comic-book superhero. OK, he can’t run really fast like The Flash, in fact he moves pretty slowly everywhere. And he’s not all stretchy like Reed Richards. He doesn’t turn green/grey and he’s not even a snappy dresser like unambiguous, right-wing nut-job, Mr. A. Plus, for some bizarre reason, Elijah reckons that water is like Kryptonite to David. Water? She-Hulk wept.

All told, David’s a pretty piss-poor superhero and I found his hero’s journey to be tedious and dull. I didn’t care about him at all. He annoyed me considerably, to be honest. Elijah was, at least, a little more interesting but it was far from enough to sustain me through 100-odd minutes.

And on that, here is my Unbreakable breakdown:

100 minutes of tedium.
1 minute of ‘Oooh, didn’t see that coming - maybe it wasn’t so bad after all’.
9 years of kicking myself for being duped, even momentarily, and of stopping strangers in the street to rail against Unbreakable.

Read more I Sat Through That? right here.

Gerry Hayes is a garret-dwelling writer subsisting on tea, beer and Flame-Grilled Steak flavour McCoy’s crisps. You can read about other stuff he doesn't like on his blog at http://stareintospace.com or you can have easy, bite-sized bits of him at http://twitter.com/gerryhayes

Friday, August 21, 2009

British World War II Movie Giveaway - NOW CLOSED

Classic British war movies up for grabs…


Having recently acquired a batch of those fantastic Daily Mail War Movie Collection DVD’s from a while back we’ve got a few duplicates lying around and thought, why not give them away to a good home? So if you want to grab yourself a copy of the following films just drop us an email with your order of preference (or registered Blogger users can leave a comment) and we’ll select the lucky recipients at random on September 5th at 5pm [NOW CLOSED - SORRY!]. Oh, and we have a couple of copies of each...

They Who Dare (1954, dir. Lewis Milestone)

Set in the Aegean Sea during World War II, They Who Dare recounts the exploits of Britain’s Special Boat Service Squadron. Sent on life-or-death commando missions, the squadron hops from island to island sabotaging Axis air bases. The impressively staged centrepiece of the film is a bold assignment led by Lt. Graham (Dirk Bogarde) to dynamite German airfields on the island of Rhodes.

The Dam Busters (1955, dir. Michael Anderson)

A much-loved British classic, Michael Anderson’s drama captures the tension and bravery of an audacious raid on the centre of Nazi Germany’s industrial complex, and the quintessentially English combination of inventiveness and dogged determination. Split into two distinct sections, the film deals first with the fraught but ultimately successful development of a new weapon by Dr. Barnes N. Wallis (Michael Redgrave). The second and pacier section deals with the mission itself during the British raid on the Ruhr Dams, and its associated costs for the enemy and for the British Airmen.

Sea of Sand (1958, dir. Guy Green)

Two contrasting officers lead men of the Long Range Desert Group (SAS) on an expedition through North Africa to destroy a huge fuel dump. Once they have achieved their goal however, they are met by an army of concealed tanks which pursue them. Fleeing, they are forced to traverse a minefield. Despite everything, it is vital that the information they have gained is returned.

The DVDs are all Region 2, and please note that the giveaway is open to UK residents only.

The Prize Finder - UK Competitions
Loquax Competitions

While you’re at it, why not check out our other World War II themed articles:

Video Nazi: Cinema of the Third Reich
Steven Spielberg: World War II Revisionist
John Wayne: World War II Propagandist

The Wolf Man trailer debuts

Watch the trailer for Universal's horror remake...

With James Cameron's Avatar trailer grabbing all the headlines yesterday when it was officially unvieled, the new trailer for director Joe Johnston's latest effort The Wolf Man kind of slipped under the radar. A remake of the 1941 Lon Chaney Jr. classic, this update stars Benicio Del Toro as Lawrence Talbot, a nobleman who returns home to search for his brother only to fall under the curse of the werewolf...


The Wolf Man is scheduled for release in February 2010.

Thursday, August 20, 2009

James Cameron's Avatar trailer released online...

Following on from the news on Monday that studio 20th Century Fox would be premiering the official trailer for James Cameron's upcoming sci-fi epic Avatar in select cinemas around the U.K., those lovely folks at Apple have today posted SD and HD versions of the trailer on their website!

Click on the still below to view the trailer...

James Cameron Avatar image
First conceived by Cameron 14 years ago and after four years of actual production, Avatar takes us to a spectacular new world beyond our imagination, where a reluctant hero embarks on a journey of redemption and discovery, as he leads a heroic battle to save a civilization. when the means to realize his vision did not yet exist.

Avatar opens in cinemas everywhere December 18, 2009.

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Video Nazi: Cinema of the Third Reich

With Inglourious Basterds released this week, we take a look at the cinema of Nazi Germany...

Hitler Goebbels and Goring
Prior to 1933 the German film industry enjoyed a highly influential and critically acclaimed period of creativity and originality but the rise of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party would see many key figures emigrate from the country, including renowned directors Joseph von Sternberg and Fritz Lang alongside screen stars Marlene Dietrich and Peter Lorre. Shortly after coming to power the Nazi Party implemented the Reichsfilmkammer (Reich Chamber of Film), which effectively nationalised the film industry under the control of Joseph Goebbels and his Ministry for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda. This move served to exclude ‘Non-Ayran’ talent and those at odds with the Nazi ideology from working in the industry while giving the state total control over the production, content and distribution of German film output.

Goebbels had once described himself as an “impassioned devotee of cinematic art”, and held a personal film collection for his private screening rooms that included classics such as Gone with the Wind (1939) and All Quiet on the Western Front (1930), which happened to be banned at the time due to perceived anti-German messages. Goebbels personally regretted the exodus of talent and initially granted more creative freedom to filmmakers, however by 1937 the Ministry for Propaganda had taken ownership of the major film studios and Goebbels’ influence stretched to script approval, financing, cast selection and beyond.

While the film industry in Nazi Germany initially appeared to flourish, many of the smaller production companies soon faced bankruptcy in the face of increased salary demands from members of the Reichsfilmkammer, along with the loss of revenue from international boycotts that banned the import of German films in other markets. This merely served to tighten the Nazis grip on the industry by enabling them to concentrate on a smaller number of production companies, with only 38 managing to survive by the outbreak of World War II (from over 100 which had existed in 1933). In addition the import of foreign (mainly Hollywood) films had also been banned, giving the Party complete control over the silver screen.

The Eternal Jew posterMost of the films produced during this period were by and large devoid of overt Nazi propaganda, with Goebbels envisioning the cinema as a tool to provide escapism and entertainment for the masses. Much of the propaganda took the form of documentaries and Party-produced shorts although by 1938 and with war just around the corner, Hitler personally complained to Goebbels about the lack of Nazi themes within the productions. In response, Goebbels approved of a number of highly anti-semetic movies such as Der ewige Jude (English: The Eternal Jew) and Jud Süß (both 1940), which played upon Nazi stereotypes of the Jewish people as materialistic and untrustworthy. In the case of Jud Süß, Goebbels personally intervened and ordered extensive reshoots after watching an early preview which depicted the lead character of Süß in a sympathetic light as opposed to that of an evil villain. So successful were these films in their aims that they helped to sway public opinion, and it was reported that a number of teenagers were so enraged by the content that they immediately set about Jud Suss posterattacking Jews after leaving the cinema.

As war raged in Europe, Goebbels continued to try and divert public attention from the Allied bombings with a number of films that incorporated comedy, music, and romance alongside patriotic messages and Nazi propaganda. Movies such as Wunschkonzert (English: Request Concert, 1940), Die große Liebe (English: The Great Love, 1942) and Kolberg (1945) were effective tools in distracting the German populace, and at the height of its popularity the film industry exceeded a billion cinema admissions.

Goebbels had also tried to improve the image of Nazi Germany by creating a ‘star system’ similar to that of Hollywood and it was not uncommon for leading Nazi figures such as Goebbels, Hitler and Luftwaffe commander Hermann Göring to appear in public alongside famous actors and actresses. Göring was married to the actress Emmy Sonnemann in 1935, while Hitler often attended dinner parties with actresses Lil Dagover and Olga Tchechowa (who was later discovered to be a Soviet sleeper agent with rumoured ties to the Hitler assassination plot). Goebbels – a notorious womaniser – was himself involved in a number of affairs and sought to divorce his wife Magda after a two year relationship with Czech actress Lida Baarova until Hitler - fearful of a scandal - ordered Goebbels to end the affair.

Adolf Hitler and Leni RiefenstahlAnother regular member of the Nazi star circuit was female filmmaker Leni Riefenstahl, who Goebbels had earlier tried to fix up with Hitler during a dinner party in 1932. Riefenstahl had begun her career as an actress and dancer in the 1920s, and in 1931 she had produced, directed and starred in Das Blaue Licht (English: The Blue Light), which had received international recognition along with moderate critical and commercial success. While Hitler baulked at romance with Riefenstahl, he was impressed by her creative talents enough to appoint her his personal filmmaker. Riefenstahl was commissioned to cover the 1934 Nuremberg Party rally, which led to the 1935 documentary Triumph des Willens (English: Triumph of the Will), a groundbreaking piece of film that featured techniques such as unusual camera angles, dramatic editing and lighting and a rousing musical score. The film received recognition and awards across the globe and was considered to be one of the greatest documentaries ever produced, despite controversy over its promotion of the Nazi regime.

Riefenstahl would follow Triumph of the Wills in 1938 with another acclaimed yet controversial documentary Olympia, which covered the 1936 Summer Olympic Games in Berlin. Once again Riefenstahl employed cutting-edge techniques for the time, and the resulting film is often regarded as one of the greatest of all time (including an appearance on Time Magazine’s All-Time 100 Movies list). While critics dismiss the film as more Nazi propaganda in line with her earlier documentary, many have defended Riefenstahl and point to the extreme close-up of Hitler as African-American Jesse Owens claims a gold medal as evidence against such allegations. Nevertheless, Riefenstahl’s association with Hitler and the Nazi Party led to her arrest in 1945 and she was tried without conviction on a number of occasions as a Nazi propagandist. This effectively ended her career, although she did release two further films in 1954 (Tiefland, filmed between 1940-44) and 2002 (Impressionen unter Wasser, English: Underwater Impressions, which premiered mere days before her 100th birthday).

German cinema would continue to prove popular in the immediate aftermath of the war, witnessing a shift towards the Italian neorealist style with the Trümmerfilm (English: ‘rubble film’) genre, which depicted harsh day-to-day reality of civilian life. This eventually led to a period of crisis and stagnation until the advent of ‘New German Cinema’ in the late 1960s, although East German cinema would remain under tight Communist control until the fall of the German Democratic Republic in 1989. Despite the propagandist nature of the films produced during the Nazi regime and the strict guidelines enforced by Goebbels, they remain of historical importance both as examples of the powerful nature of the medium as a tool for propaganda and for pioneering production techniques and technical achievements, although clearly the deep association with Nazi ideals rightly ensures they remain highly controversial.

Gary Collinson

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Lean Times: A David Lean Profile (Part 3)

Trevor Hogg profiles the career of acclaimed filmmaker Sir David Lean in the third of a three-part feature... be sure to read the first and second parts!

Sir David LeanWhile David Lean was directing Summertime, he received a cable from Sam Spiegel asking if he would direct The Bridge on the River Kwai. Lean sought advice from his leading lady, Katharine Hepburn, who had had a tumultuous relationship with the Hollywood producer during the filming of The African Queen (1951); she told him, “Take it. You’ll learn a lot from him. And he’ll learn a lot from you.”

Before accepting the prestigious assignment about a group of captive British soldiers who construct a bridge for the Japanese Army during WWII, David Lean had some serious concerns regarding the source material. “Pierre Boulle’s book was wonderfully funny but as far as movies are concerned he went too far,” stated Lean. “Boulle was having a great joke against the British when he wrote it. It was just not believable when Clipton comes up to the colonel, ‘I suppose we have to paint the thing, sir?’ ‘Don’t even think such a thing, Clipton,’ said the Colonel testily. ‘The most we could do is give it a coating of lime – and a fine target it would make for the RAF wouldn’t it! You seem to forget there’s a war on!’ I thought that was going too far. I went over to Sam Spiegel and said, ‘If I can tone it down, if I can do it like the book but take the excesses out, I’ll do it.’”

The Bridge on the River Kwai posterThe fundamental creative challenge for the director was making the motivations of Colonel Nicholson, portrayed by Alec Guinness, comprehendible to the audience. “If they don’t understand and admire him in spite of his misguided actions, his statue will diminish – and being the cornerstone of the film, the size of the film will diminish with him.” In assessing the author’s depiction of the British in the book, the director responded, “We love the letter of the law. We are ‘superior’ and stubborn as mules. Boulle has taken all of these characteristics, and with a great deal of warmth, admiration, and understanding. He has shown the characteristics of the old school tie carried to tragic lengths. The story of the building of a bridge over the River Kwai is the story of a folly. It is a folly to which all of us might subscribe under the pressures, emotions, and tempers of war. If we can show this minor incident as a miniature reproduction of a greater folly which is the War itself, we shall have a great film.”

Released in 1957, The Bridge on the River Kwai would go on to dominate the Oscars, winning Best Actor (Alex Guinness), Best Picture, Best Director, Best Editing, Best Cinematography, Best Adapted Screenplay, and Best Musical Score.

A biopic on Mahatma Gandhi was next on the agenda for David Lean, with Alec Guinness set to play the historical figure. However, when the director’s relationship with screenwriter Emeric Pressburger reached an impasse, the he shifted his focus toward the exploits of a fellow countryman, T.E. Lawrence. By uniting the Arab nations into a singular fighting force, Lawrence successfully launched an assault on Damascus in 1918, defeating the Turkish army. Based on the autobiography called Seven Pillars of Wisdom, the final draft of the screenplay would be completed by English playwright Robert Bolt, who gained fame by penning A Man For All Seasons.

After a reconnaissance visit to Jordan, Lean wrote in a letter, “The desert is wonderful. It gave me a bit of a shock as it wasn’t at all what I expected from my boyhood diet of The Sheik, The Garden of Allah, and Beau Geste. Perhaps the reason is that all of these entertainments have dealt with North Africa. The Seven Pillars country is something quite different. At first I was terribly worried by not finding what I expected. I thought I would find miles and miles of flat sand and rolling sand dunes and they’re just not here. Then suddenly I realized that what I was seeing was better than what I’d hope to see.” Lean’s enthusiasm was tempered with a nagging worry as he continued to write. “Am I mad? Can I make audiences share my thrill? I know I’m a sort of maniac because the thrill of seeing these places makes up, by a long chalk, for the discomfort of the living conditions. I do realize we’ve got a tough time ahead, with the British unit who expect mashed potatoe [sic] with every meal and won’t give a care for Lawrence, the desert or me.”

Lawrence of ArabiaLike T. E. Lawrence who commanded the Arabs to a military victory, Lean found himself in a similar situation. “I remember Anthony Quayle coming out on location,” remarked the director, “I remember him saying, ‘You’re like a bloody general out here. You’ve got a huge army under your control. I’m madly impressed.’ I never thought of it that way. I suppose it was rather like that. You do have a lot of officers and privates and God knows what else. And you get to know them all very well. That’s really why I like working with the same people. Because you can talk to them in a sort of shorthand, just a point here or there and they know what you mean, and you can work quite fast.”

As much as the movie is revered for its spectacular scenery, the attention to detail also added a great deal to the atmosphere of the story. “One of the cleverest things in Lawrence,” reflected Lean, “I’m not so sure whose idea it was – probably John Box’s - concerned the Arab robes. Lawrence is given these robes fairly early on, when he’s accepted by the Arabs and then the rot starts to set in, and he is seized by a sort of power mania. What the costume people did was gradually to change the texture of the material from which his Arab clothes were made, and they made it thinner and thinner until it was just muslin, and at the end he is just ghostlike. Nobody ever spots it.”

The 1962 film became David Lean’s second consecutive Academy Awards triumph as Lawrence of Arabia was awarded with Best Picture, Best Director, Best Cinematography (Colour), Best Art Direction and Set Decoration (Colour), Best Sound, Best Musical Score, and Best Editing.

With George Stevens falling behind and over budget on his film about the life of Jesus, Lean agreed to assist in the production. Entitled The Greatest Story Ever Told (1965) the British filmmaker directed some of the scenes featuring actor Claude Rains as King Herod; he found himself enjoying the experience of working with an American movie crew. “Everything moves much faster than in an English studio,” David Lean wrote during his two week stay in the United States, “Yesterday morning I went in and changed a complete setup which had been lit and rehearsed the previous night. Not one murmur from anyone except that about half a dozen of the workmen came up and said how much better they thought the idea was and hoped I didn’t think they took too long in making the change!”

While crossing the South Atlantic aboard a cruise ship, Lean decided to read a five hundred page novel that his agent had sent to him. “So I propped myself up and read and read the first night and became more interested. The next night I thought, ‘I’ll finish it tonight,’ and ended up sitting in my bed, with a box of Kleenex, wiping tears away. I was so touched by it, and I thought that if I can be touched by this, sitting in a liner, reading a book, I must be able to make a good, touching film of it. As soon as I landed, I contacted my agent and said, ‘Yes, I’ll do Doctor Zhivago.’”

Doctor Zhivago posterSet during the Russian Revolution, the Nobel Prize winning book recounts the love affairs of a doctor who aspires to become a poet. Reuniting with Robert Bolt, the director instructed the screenwriter, “The love story being a human basic will touch almost everyone. I’m not saying I think the inner political conflict should be ignored, I am saying that we can’t expect the mass audience to follow the refinement of conflict in this area. It must be stated as simply as possible in my opinion. The audience will understand every nuance of the love story. If we try to shift the weight on to the other conflict I think they will become impatient.”

Unrest on the film set became a regular occurrence with the veteran moviemaker’s aloofness not helping matters. “I envy people who have sudden flashes of genius,” confessed Lean, “because I don’t. I try to work out every possible way to do a scene and then choose the way that will surprise audiences. If I seem to be in another world when friends and unit people speak to me, it’s because I don’t have the scene solved. I’m frequently thought to be rude when I’m really in a mental turmoil.”

While shooting in Spain, the production was plagued by a lack of snow, and creating the scene where the Red Army charges across the frozen lake, required some innovation. “There wasn’t a lake there at all,” stated property master Eddie Fowlie. “It was just a great big field. I spread it all with cement and in certain places I put down sheet iron. I used an awful lot of crushed white marble on top, thousands of tons of it, which we ironed out with steamrollers, so the horses were able to slide on that in a more natural way.”

Initially, the prospects for Doctor Zhivago did not look good as it was released to mixed reviews in 1965. “I felt absolutely sick at heart and ashamed,” remarked the British director. “I thought the picture was rather good. I thought it worked. I couldn’t believe it was as bad as they said it was.” As for the audience response, things were not looking much better. “For the first week that theatre was empty,” began David Lean, “and MGM was paying to keep the film on. The second week it picked up a bit, the third week it picked up more and by the fourth week you couldn’t get a seat.” The momentum built to the point that the movie was nominated for ten Oscars and was awarded with Best Art Direction and Set Design (Colour), Best Cinematography (Colour), Custom Design (Colour), Best Musical Score, and Best Adapted Screenplay.

Ryans Daughter posterWhen a script of Robert Bolt’s adaptation of Madame Bovary arrived it served as the basis for the British director’s 1970 film Ryan’s Daughter. “We chose Ireland,” explained Lean in reference to his decision not to set the story of infidelity in France, “because we had to have an outside conflict, something over the hill to come and affect the characters. The 1916 Irish situation suited us rather well.” In recounting the tale, David Lean explained, “A girl marries her teacher who, because he taught her about great men and their music and their romantic imaginings, she believes he has a similar heroic greatness. He has none at all; he is just a simple, good man and no match for romantic youthful imaginings.”

John Mills was cast as the “village idiot” who exposes the illicit love affair between the young woman played by Sarah Miles, and a shell-shocked British officer portrayed by Christopher Jones. The relationship between Lean and Robert Mitchum, who had the role of the cuckold husband, was an uneasy one. “I knew he [Lean] was an eccentric,” reflected Mitchum, “but I didn’t know in which direction that manifested itself. The rewarding part of it was that I finally met somebody who considered the medium as important as I did. Only he suffered it. I rather insulated myself against the suffering. But David suffers and I suffered along with him. And I think he’s rather shy in the revelation of his own feelings.”

The other complication was the unpredictable Irish weather. “We spent a year in Ireland and poor David had such miserable luck,” said Miles. “Once we did half a scene and I remember waiting in my caravan for three solid weeks before there was enough sun to finish the other half of the scene.” As the twenty-six week schedule proved inadequate and production costs rose high above the nine million dollar budget, MGM began to worry as to whether or not the British filmmaker was capable of completing the picture; the studio executives arrived on location and had a meeting with him. “If it is important enough for you to fly all the way from America to see me,” he told them, “I’ll abandon shooting until such time as you’re completely happy.” They were gone the next morning.”

Influential movie critic Pauline Kael of The New Yorker wrote, “The emptiness of Ryan’s Daughter shows in every frame, and yet the publicity machine has turned it into an artistic event, and the American public is a sucker for the corrupt tastefulness of well-bred English epics.” Even after John Mills received the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor, Lean could not rebound from the barrage of harsh criticism. “I thought,” the director recalled, “What the hell am I doing if my work is as bad as all this? I’ll do something else. I went traveling around the world and I didn’t make a film for fourteen years. I thought, ‘What’s the point?’”

During his self-imposed exile, David Lean had not completely abandoned the idea of doing another movie. A fully-functional ship was being built in New Zealand while Robert Bolt and Lean collaborated on two scripts about the infamous mutiny and prosecution of the crew members aboard an armed British sea vessel. The project collapsed due to a lack of financing. Ironically, the first screenplay, entitled The Lawbreakers, was resurrected in 1984 under the direction of Roger Donaldson as The Bounty; the same year, Lean returned with what would become his last movie, A Passage to India.

A Passage to India posterThe story created by author E.M. Forster tells of an English woman who accuses a Muslim doctor of rape while visiting India. In writing to Santha Rama Rau about the script she had sent him, the director stated, “I was introduced to A Passage to India through your play at the Comedy [Theatre] and it was the reason I said yes to this film without rereading the book.” In addressing the cave scene where the sexual crime was supposedly committed, Lean advised the playwright, “I think we have to agree between ourselves exactly what did happen. At the moment I can only see it as an honest to goodness hallucination. Difficult but interesting. Apart from withholding it until the trial, I believe we should play fair with our audience and have no truck with red herrings, it’s not that sort of film.” Eventually, David Lean would abandon the collaboration and go about composing his own draft as he had done with his Dickens films.

“What I believe we’re all hoping for is a movie which is true to the book but which will also appeal to the man in the street,” declared the British filmmaker. “We are blessed with a fine title, A Passage to India. But it has a built-in danger; it holds out such promise. The very mention of India conjures up high expectation. It has sweep and size and is very romantic. It we don’t fulfill those expectations I fear we will lose a great part of our mass audience.” Sandy Lean, the filmmaker’s fifth wife, observed, “On A Passage to India, David was working for the first time in his life on a film where money was really tight and where there were restrictive conditions on him personally. He actually had to forfeit salary if he went over budget or over schedule. It was one of the conditions of the completion guarantee, but he never stopped resenting it.” She went on to add. “And there were so many other pressures, he felt besieged. The camera crew was in revolt, the actors in various states of dudgeon. In the end he just lowered his head like a bull and charged the whole lot of them.”

In spite of all the production and financial hassles, the film received eleven Academy Award nominations and won for Best Supporting Actress (Peggy Ashcroft) and Best Music Score; as for its director, he found himself gracing the cover of Time and being knighted by the Queen of England.

At the Cambridge Film Society in 1985, the university students recommended Nostromo by Joseph Conrad as the next movie for their guest speaker, Sir David Lean. He embraced the suggestion and set about working with playwright Christopher Hampton to adapt the tale about the destructive nature of greed for the big screen. “I thought Conrad was a very good match for David’s temperament,” remarked Hampton, “because he was very positive about individuals but very pessimistic about the human race in general.” As that project, which at one point had Steven Spielberg involved, floundered another flourished. The film restoration of Lawrence of Arabia allowed the director the opportunity to make some changes to his to desert epic. In summing up how he approached his craft, the British moviemaker wrote, “In making a film I’m always very conscious of the audience. A lot of the time I almost feel as if they’re sitting with me behind the camera.”

When Lean died in 1991, John Mills honoured him by reading the opening passage of Great Expectations, while The Royal Philharmonic Orchestra performed the musical scores from his movies at the memorial service in St. Paul’s Cathedral. In a final salute to the legendary filmmaker, the band of Blues and Royals played Colonel Bogey, the theme song from the movie which brought him to international attention and acclaim, The Bridge on the River Kwai.


Trevor Hogg is a freelance video editor and writer who currently resides in Canada.