Results of our latest poll...
We've been running a poll on the site lately to coincide with Trevor Hogg's comprehensive (and most excellent) profile on Pixar Animation Studios, asking for your favourite from their incredible back-catalogue of CG wonders. Well, the results are finally in and The Incredibles stands as the clear winner with 19% of the 398 responses opting for Brad Bird's 2004 superhero comedy ahead of WALL-E and Ratatouille in second and third.
Meanwhile merchandising bohemoth Cars (with estimated merchandising sales of $5 billion) was the only film not to break double-figures in terms of votes. Check out the full results below:
Your Favourite Pixar...
The Incredibles (2004) - 19%
WALL-E (2008) - 17%
Ratatouille (2007) - 15%
Up (2009) - 10%
Monsters, Inc. (2001) - 10%
Finding Nemo (2003) - 10%
Toy Story (1995) - 8%
Toy Story 2 (1999) - 3%
A Bug's Life (1998) - 2%
Cars (2006) - 2%
Thanks to everyone for taking the time to vote.
Monday, November 30, 2009
Sunday, November 29, 2009
I Sat Through That? #21 - The Transporter (2002)
In which Gerry Hayes considers Rule One: Anything where Statham’s driving...
The Transporter, 2002.
Directed by Corey Yuen.
Starring Jason Statham, Qi Shu, Matt Schulze.
Written by Luc Besson and Robert Mark Kamen.
You know, I almost don’t want to include The Transporter in this series. Oh there’s no doubt that it’s drivel but the thing is, it doesn’t really pretend to be anything else. It’s brainless entertainment with no other purpose or pretences. It’s essentially just a bunch of coloured lights and noises designed to keep people gawping for an hour and a half instead of going out, getting pissed and picking a fight with someone smaller. The Transporter isn’t trying to be high-brow or to ‘say something’. It’s not trying to ‘work on a number of levels’ (it barely has one) and, for all of these reasons, I’m a little reluctant to include it here.
That said, I saw it recently and, my god, it’s rubbish.
Jason Statham (now pretty much typecast as ‘that bloke who drives stuff’) plays Frank Martin, an ex-special forces hard man, retired to the south of France. There, he makes ends meet by driving stuff about. He’s essentially a sort of taxi cum courier service but with added hardness.
He has a BMW of which he’s geekily proud. He’s even installed a fake looking keypad to immobilise the car and make sure fares can’t shoot him and drive off. He’s no-muss-no-fuss and he’s the coolest guy ever to don a pair of driving gloves.
Everything’s going swimmingly until Frank gets hired by a bad guy called Wall Street (Schulze). You can tell immediately he’s a bad guy as he’s all cocky and mental. If you met him in real life, you’d say “well, this bloke has a job for me but he looks a bit like the sort who would double-cross me and probably try to kill me in some cruel, inventive manner - I might pass”.
Mr. Street gives Frank a ‘package’ to deliver. Frank pops off happily with the package in the boot/trunk (I’m catering to audiences on both sides of the Atlantic there - did you notice?).
Frank’s curiosity, however, gets the better of him and he breaks his own, self-imposed rule about not looking in the package and he looks in the package. Inside he finds a girl, Lai (Qi Shu). It’s about here that the stupidest thing you have ever seen happens. Not just the stupidest thing you’ve ever seen in a film but the stupidest thing you’ve seen anywhere, ever:
Lai tells Frank she needs to visit the little girl’s room. Frank, who earlier in the film, didn’t mind bank-robber brains all over his car, gets all squeamish at the thought of a bit of girl-pee in it and lets her wander off into the woods, far out of sight, to do her filthy business. A lesser man might worry that she would take the opportunity to run off. Frank, however, has the benefit of his Special Forces training which has thought him that draping the end of a long rope, loosely, about his prisoner’s shoulders will allow her to wander two hundred feet into the woods, out of sight, with little or no hope of escape.
I won’t spoil things by telling how this - seemingly flawless - plan worked out.
The film goes on in a pretty similar vein. Something ridiculous happens and then there’s a big fight. Something moronic happens and then there’s lots of shooting and rockets. Something imbecilic happens and then there’s...
...An intensely homo-erotic, oil-fight between loads of bad-guys and a bare-chested, greased-up Jason Statham. Yep, Statham - with the big guns out - gets himself all lubed-up and squelches and squirms about the floor of a bus garage with a dozen other men.
As you might expect, once he's despatched the oiled men, Statham saves the day in a manly, big-bicepsed sort of way and sits back and waits for the call about the sequel.
Personally, I’m quite looking forward to Italian Death Transporter Job IV.
Read more I Sat Through That? right here.
Gerry Hayes is a garret-dwelling writer subsisting on tea, beer and Flame-Grilled Steak flavour McCoy’s crisps. You can read about other stuff he doesn't like on his blog at http://stareintospace.com or you can have easy, bite-sized bits of him at http://twitter.com/gerryhayes
The Transporter, 2002.
Directed by Corey Yuen.
Starring Jason Statham, Qi Shu, Matt Schulze.
Written by Luc Besson and Robert Mark Kamen.
You know, I almost don’t want to include The Transporter in this series. Oh there’s no doubt that it’s drivel but the thing is, it doesn’t really pretend to be anything else. It’s brainless entertainment with no other purpose or pretences. It’s essentially just a bunch of coloured lights and noises designed to keep people gawping for an hour and a half instead of going out, getting pissed and picking a fight with someone smaller. The Transporter isn’t trying to be high-brow or to ‘say something’. It’s not trying to ‘work on a number of levels’ (it barely has one) and, for all of these reasons, I’m a little reluctant to include it here.
That said, I saw it recently and, my god, it’s rubbish.
Jason Statham (now pretty much typecast as ‘that bloke who drives stuff’) plays Frank Martin, an ex-special forces hard man, retired to the south of France. There, he makes ends meet by driving stuff about. He’s essentially a sort of taxi cum courier service but with added hardness.
He has a BMW of which he’s geekily proud. He’s even installed a fake looking keypad to immobilise the car and make sure fares can’t shoot him and drive off. He’s no-muss-no-fuss and he’s the coolest guy ever to don a pair of driving gloves.
Everything’s going swimmingly until Frank gets hired by a bad guy called Wall Street (Schulze). You can tell immediately he’s a bad guy as he’s all cocky and mental. If you met him in real life, you’d say “well, this bloke has a job for me but he looks a bit like the sort who would double-cross me and probably try to kill me in some cruel, inventive manner - I might pass”.
Mr. Street gives Frank a ‘package’ to deliver. Frank pops off happily with the package in the boot/trunk (I’m catering to audiences on both sides of the Atlantic there - did you notice?).
Frank’s curiosity, however, gets the better of him and he breaks his own, self-imposed rule about not looking in the package and he looks in the package. Inside he finds a girl, Lai (Qi Shu). It’s about here that the stupidest thing you have ever seen happens. Not just the stupidest thing you’ve ever seen in a film but the stupidest thing you’ve seen anywhere, ever:
Lai tells Frank she needs to visit the little girl’s room. Frank, who earlier in the film, didn’t mind bank-robber brains all over his car, gets all squeamish at the thought of a bit of girl-pee in it and lets her wander off into the woods, far out of sight, to do her filthy business. A lesser man might worry that she would take the opportunity to run off. Frank, however, has the benefit of his Special Forces training which has thought him that draping the end of a long rope, loosely, about his prisoner’s shoulders will allow her to wander two hundred feet into the woods, out of sight, with little or no hope of escape.
I won’t spoil things by telling how this - seemingly flawless - plan worked out.
The film goes on in a pretty similar vein. Something ridiculous happens and then there’s a big fight. Something moronic happens and then there’s lots of shooting and rockets. Something imbecilic happens and then there’s...
...An intensely homo-erotic, oil-fight between loads of bad-guys and a bare-chested, greased-up Jason Statham. Yep, Statham - with the big guns out - gets himself all lubed-up and squelches and squirms about the floor of a bus garage with a dozen other men.
As you might expect, once he's despatched the oiled men, Statham saves the day in a manly, big-bicepsed sort of way and sits back and waits for the call about the sequel.
Personally, I’m quite looking forward to Italian Death Transporter Job IV.
Read more I Sat Through That? right here.
Gerry Hayes is a garret-dwelling writer subsisting on tea, beer and Flame-Grilled Steak flavour McCoy’s crisps. You can read about other stuff he doesn't like on his blog at http://stareintospace.com or you can have easy, bite-sized bits of him at http://twitter.com/gerryhayes
Saturday, November 28, 2009
Movies... For Free! The Outlaw (1943)
"Movies... For Free!", showcasing classic movies that have fallen out of copyright and are available freely from the public domain (with streaming video!)...
The Outlaw, 1943.
Directed by Howard Hughes.
Starring Jane Russell, Jack Buetel and Thomas Mitchell.
Silver screen siren Jane Russell makes her debut in the controversial romantic western The Outlaw from legendary American industrialist and film producer Howard Hughes, who took over directing duties after an uncredited Howard Hawks left the project in favour of 1941 war biopic Sergeant York. The film centres on a fued between famed Old West gunslingers Doc Holliday (Walter Huston) and Billy the Kid (Jack Buetel) after the young outlaw seduces Holliday's girlfriend Rio (Russell), and also features Thomas Mitchell as newly appointed Lincoln, NM sheriff Pat Garrett.
Production originally wrapped in 1941, but Hughes - who had embarked on a nationwide search to find an actress with suitable 'talents' for the part of Rio - ran into major difficulties with the Motion Picture Production Code due to the film's highly sexualised content and emphasis on Russell's cleavage. After making a number of cuts the film was finally approved but Hughes decided to shelve the movie when local state censors demanded further revisions. The controversy surrounding The Outlaw (along with a provocative advertising campaign) resulted in the film becoming a box-office hit when it eventually received a general release in 1946.
Embed courtesy of Internet Archive.
Related:
His Girl Friday (1940)
Lady of Burlesque (1943)
Click here to view all entries in our Movies... For Free! collection.
The Outlaw, 1943.
Directed by Howard Hughes.
Starring Jane Russell, Jack Buetel and Thomas Mitchell.
Silver screen siren Jane Russell makes her debut in the controversial romantic western The Outlaw from legendary American industrialist and film producer Howard Hughes, who took over directing duties after an uncredited Howard Hawks left the project in favour of 1941 war biopic Sergeant York. The film centres on a fued between famed Old West gunslingers Doc Holliday (Walter Huston) and Billy the Kid (Jack Buetel) after the young outlaw seduces Holliday's girlfriend Rio (Russell), and also features Thomas Mitchell as newly appointed Lincoln, NM sheriff Pat Garrett.
Production originally wrapped in 1941, but Hughes - who had embarked on a nationwide search to find an actress with suitable 'talents' for the part of Rio - ran into major difficulties with the Motion Picture Production Code due to the film's highly sexualised content and emphasis on Russell's cleavage. After making a number of cuts the film was finally approved but Hughes decided to shelve the movie when local state censors demanded further revisions. The controversy surrounding The Outlaw (along with a provocative advertising campaign) resulted in the film becoming a box-office hit when it eventually received a general release in 1946.
Embed courtesy of Internet Archive.
Related:
His Girl Friday (1940)
Lady of Burlesque (1943)
Click here to view all entries in our Movies... For Free! collection.
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Bringing Star Wars to the Small Screen - The Ewoks and Droids Adventure Hour (1985-86)
Continuing our series of articles examining the various screen incarnations of George Lucas’ Star Wars saga, we turn our attention to the first animated entries in the saga, Ewoks and Droids: The Adventures of R2-D2 and C-3PO…
Star Wars: Ewoks.
Star Wars: Droids – The Adventures of R2-D2 and C-3PO.
Executive Producer George Lucas.
Featuring the voice talents of Jim Henshaw, Eric Peterson, Denny Delk, James Cranna and Anthony Daniels.
SYNOPSIS:
Fifteen years before the Battle of Yavin droid duo R2-D2 and C-3PO embark on a series of adventures that sees them do battle with pirates, gangsters, and agents of the Empire. Meanwhile prior to the Battle of Endor, Wicket W. Warrick and his Ewok friends see their peaceful existence threatened by distant cousins the Duloks, along with their sworn enemy, the evil sorceress Morag.
Following the ratings success of George Lucas’ first TV movie Caravan of Courage: An Ewok Adventure (1984), network ABC secured the rights to two animated series based on the Star Wars canon - Ewoks and Droids. With their work on the ten-minute animated portion of CBS’ infamous 1978 Star Wars Holiday Special having impressed Lucas, Canadian company Nelvana Limited – who had recently found success as subcontractors to DiC on the popular children’s show Care Bears – were tasked with producing the cartoons on behalf of Lucasfilm.
Regular Nelvana directors Raymond Jafelice and Ken Stephenson – both of whom had extensive experience on Inspector Gadget – were brought in to oversee direction on Ewoks and Droids respectively, with Dale Schott (Care Bears Movie II: A New Generation) replacing Jafelice for the second season of Ewoks. A number of notable writers were hired to produce the scripts for Ewoks including Bob Carrau (The Ewok Adventure), Paul Dini and Michael Reaves (Batman: The Animated Series), and Linda Woolverton (Tim Burton’s upcoming live-action Alice in Wonderland), while Peter Sauder (head writer on Inspector Gadget) handled scriptwriting duties on Droids along with Lucasfilm regulars Ben Burtt and Joe Johnston, who brought much needed Star Wars pedigree to the project.
Having chosen to focus the shows on the Ewok and droid characters due to their popularity with children, the production team soon found themselves working to a number of restrictions including limited physical contact and use of weaponry, not to mention the inclusion of speeder seatbelts. This sort of moral regulation was common for the Saturday morning cartoons of the time and ABC - who rejected Paul Dini’s first story pitch concerning an Imperial pilot who crash lands on the forest moon and befriends the Ewoks as “too Star Warsy” – were clear on their target audience. Further problems occurred for the Korean animation team, who struggled with the human characters in Droids in addition to the sheer volume of cels needed for the high-quality animation.
The Ewoks and Droids Adventure Hour premiered on September 7th 1985 at an estimated cost of $500,000 per hour and - despite the numerous restrictions - managed to deliver a number of entertaining storylines to keep the younger viewer (and withdrawn Star Wars aficionado) engaged. The first season ran for thirteen episodes throughout the latter part of 1985 before the decision was made to axe Droids in favour of a dedicated Ewok half-hour (advertised as The All New Ewoks) that would adopt an even more child-friendly approach. Droids did make a final appearance as a special double-episode entitled The Great Heep that premiered on June 7th 1986, before the second season of Ewoks began airing later in September. However, this new shift in focus failed to engage viewers in a highly competitive, over-saturated marketplace and the show was failed to be renewed for a third season, ending after just twenty-six episodes.
While easily eclipsed by the more recent animated entries in the saga, Ewoks and Droids provided a last-gasp, desperate feast of new material for those who suffered the slow demise of Star Wars in the mid-eighties and still holds nostalgic value to this day. Droids in particular featured numerous references to the original trilogy such as an appearance by fan-favourite Boba Fett and fellow bounty hunter IG-88, while a number of prequel elements including the planet Bogden, Boonta Race, and General Grievous’ Episode III wheel bike also stand as nods to the series. Unfortunately for Star Wars completionists a full release of the entire series looks highly unlikely, and with only sporadic home video releases on VHS along with two DVD compilations under the “Star Wars Animated Adventures” banner in 2004, both Ewoks and Droids look certain to remain, for many fans, a rather obscure entry in the franchise.
Up Next…
The Star Wars Holiday Special (1978)
Bringing Star Wars to the Screen: Episode IV – A New Hope
Bringing Star Wars to the Screen: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back
Bringing Star Wars to the Screen: Episode VI – Return of the Jedi
Bringing Star Wars to the Small Screen: The Star Wars Holiday Special
Bringing Star Wars to the Small Screen: Caravan of Courage - An Ewok Adventure
Bringing Star Wars to the Small Screen: Ewoks - Battle For Endor (1985)
Gary Collinson
Star Wars: Ewoks.
Star Wars: Droids – The Adventures of R2-D2 and C-3PO.
Executive Producer George Lucas.
Featuring the voice talents of Jim Henshaw, Eric Peterson, Denny Delk, James Cranna and Anthony Daniels.
SYNOPSIS:
Fifteen years before the Battle of Yavin droid duo R2-D2 and C-3PO embark on a series of adventures that sees them do battle with pirates, gangsters, and agents of the Empire. Meanwhile prior to the Battle of Endor, Wicket W. Warrick and his Ewok friends see their peaceful existence threatened by distant cousins the Duloks, along with their sworn enemy, the evil sorceress Morag.
Following the ratings success of George Lucas’ first TV movie Caravan of Courage: An Ewok Adventure (1984), network ABC secured the rights to two animated series based on the Star Wars canon - Ewoks and Droids. With their work on the ten-minute animated portion of CBS’ infamous 1978 Star Wars Holiday Special having impressed Lucas, Canadian company Nelvana Limited – who had recently found success as subcontractors to DiC on the popular children’s show Care Bears – were tasked with producing the cartoons on behalf of Lucasfilm.
Regular Nelvana directors Raymond Jafelice and Ken Stephenson – both of whom had extensive experience on Inspector Gadget – were brought in to oversee direction on Ewoks and Droids respectively, with Dale Schott (Care Bears Movie II: A New Generation) replacing Jafelice for the second season of Ewoks. A number of notable writers were hired to produce the scripts for Ewoks including Bob Carrau (The Ewok Adventure), Paul Dini and Michael Reaves (Batman: The Animated Series), and Linda Woolverton (Tim Burton’s upcoming live-action Alice in Wonderland), while Peter Sauder (head writer on Inspector Gadget) handled scriptwriting duties on Droids along with Lucasfilm regulars Ben Burtt and Joe Johnston, who brought much needed Star Wars pedigree to the project.
Having chosen to focus the shows on the Ewok and droid characters due to their popularity with children, the production team soon found themselves working to a number of restrictions including limited physical contact and use of weaponry, not to mention the inclusion of speeder seatbelts. This sort of moral regulation was common for the Saturday morning cartoons of the time and ABC - who rejected Paul Dini’s first story pitch concerning an Imperial pilot who crash lands on the forest moon and befriends the Ewoks as “too Star Warsy” – were clear on their target audience. Further problems occurred for the Korean animation team, who struggled with the human characters in Droids in addition to the sheer volume of cels needed for the high-quality animation.
The Ewoks and Droids Adventure Hour premiered on September 7th 1985 at an estimated cost of $500,000 per hour and - despite the numerous restrictions - managed to deliver a number of entertaining storylines to keep the younger viewer (and withdrawn Star Wars aficionado) engaged. The first season ran for thirteen episodes throughout the latter part of 1985 before the decision was made to axe Droids in favour of a dedicated Ewok half-hour (advertised as The All New Ewoks) that would adopt an even more child-friendly approach. Droids did make a final appearance as a special double-episode entitled The Great Heep that premiered on June 7th 1986, before the second season of Ewoks began airing later in September. However, this new shift in focus failed to engage viewers in a highly competitive, over-saturated marketplace and the show was failed to be renewed for a third season, ending after just twenty-six episodes.
While easily eclipsed by the more recent animated entries in the saga, Ewoks and Droids provided a last-gasp, desperate feast of new material for those who suffered the slow demise of Star Wars in the mid-eighties and still holds nostalgic value to this day. Droids in particular featured numerous references to the original trilogy such as an appearance by fan-favourite Boba Fett and fellow bounty hunter IG-88, while a number of prequel elements including the planet Bogden, Boonta Race, and General Grievous’ Episode III wheel bike also stand as nods to the series. Unfortunately for Star Wars completionists a full release of the entire series looks highly unlikely, and with only sporadic home video releases on VHS along with two DVD compilations under the “Star Wars Animated Adventures” banner in 2004, both Ewoks and Droids look certain to remain, for many fans, a rather obscure entry in the franchise.
Up Next…
The Star Wars Holiday Special (1978)
Bringing Star Wars to the Screen: Episode IV – A New Hope
Bringing Star Wars to the Screen: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back
Bringing Star Wars to the Screen: Episode VI – Return of the Jedi
Bringing Star Wars to the Small Screen: The Star Wars Holiday Special
Bringing Star Wars to the Small Screen: Caravan of Courage - An Ewok Adventure
Bringing Star Wars to the Small Screen: Ewoks - Battle For Endor (1985)
Gary Collinson
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Resurfacing: A James Cameron Profile (Part 1)
With upcoming sci-fi epic Avatar set to end twelve years of cinema exile for James Cameron, Trevor Hogg profiles the career of the influential Hollywood filmmaker in the first of a three part feature...
Growing up in a small Ontario town located on the banks of the Chippawa Creek, James Cameron developed a fascination with water. Along with the natural landscape, the adolescent was greatly influenced by his parents. “My mother was a housewife but she was also an artist,” stated Cameron. “My father was an electrical engineer [at a paper mill]. So right there you have a collision of left and right hemisphere thinking and I think I got equal parts of both.”
Fueling the childhood imagination of the Canadian filmmaker were the works of Arthur C. Clarke, A.E. Van Vogt, Harlan Ellison, and Larry Niven. “I spent all my free time in the town library and I read an awful lot of science fiction and the line between reality and fantasy blurred. I was as interested in the reality of biology as I was in reading science fiction stories about genetic mutations and post-nuclear war environments and inter-stellar traveling, [and] meeting alien races.”
Attending Stamford Collegiate, the teenager found himself an outsider in an athletic oriented high school. “The critical moment for me was in 11th grade. My biology teacher, Mr. McKenzie, decided that what our school needed was a theatre arts program and we didn’t have it.” The newly established academic endeavor introduced Cameron to the rigors of creating a theatrical show. “We had to build the props and the scenery and the costumes and do everything ourselves. We had to turn the stage into a proper working stage. It took a year, but we started putting on our own productions.”
Even though the experience inspired him, James Cameron still remained a man of science. “All the way through high school, even into college, I majored in physics.” But the situation dramatically changed for the undergrad student who had moved to California along with his family in 1971. “I hit kind of a wall with math. I had a bad teacher who turned me off of calculus at a critical moment, and even though my grades were very high in astronomy and physics, I switched to English because I wanted to write.”
Shifting his academic focus allowed Cameron to bridge the gap between his artistic and scientific inclinations. “What finally attracted me to film in such a definitive way was…it was the only place I could reconcile the need to tell stories and to work in a visual art medium, and the desire to understand things at a technological level – and my fascination with engineering and technology.”
Dropping out of Fullerton College, James Cameron married his first wife Sharon Williams and drove a truck for the local school district. But not all was lost for the aspiring moviemaker. “I was in a small group of people who went to see every single science fiction film,” recollected Cameron. “When Star Wars (1977) came out, everybody wanted to catch that wave, but nobody knew how to do it. There was a group of guys who wanted to make a low-budget movie as a tax shelter. A friend of mine got involved with them pitching ideas like The Sorority Massacre type of stuff. He called me up and said, ‘Hey, have you got any ideas?’ I said, ‘Yeah, I’ve got a couple.’’
Impressed with the story proposal, the investors wanted James Cameron to develop it further. “We shot some test shots in 16 m.m. and put together a little demo film. They liked that. Then they gave us another $20,000 to do a teaser that was meant to be part of a proposal to raise more money from a group of general partners. We shot a twelve-minute film with a lot of animation, visual effects, [and] matte paintings. We taught ourselves how to do it. For me, that was really the transition to being a filmmaker. To do that I had to quit my job driving a truck and work on that all the time.”
Xenogenesis (1978) is a science fiction short film in which a man (William Wisher Jr.) from the future battles with an armored robot. The plan to produce a feature length version never happened, however, the project did enable its originator to get a job sculpting models for a B-movie mogul, Roger Corman.
“I found I did pretty well in a chaotic environment,” stated Cameron of his time at New World Pictures during the early 1980s. “I could manipulate the situation to position myself to (a) learn what I needed to learn, (b) do what I wanted to do, and (c) advance to the next level. If they gave me the credits I should have gotten on that picture [Battle Beyond the Stars, 1980], I would have gotten five or six. I did matte paintings, was a visual effects cameraman, ran my own visual effects motion control unit, designed and built three-quarters of the sets as art director. I was a model builder and designed and built a front projection system. I operated it on the first day of shooting, then turned it over to some other people and went on to be art director. I was skipping from one job to another.”
Realizing that he had the stamina for the work and a basic understanding of filmmaking, James Cameron decided to take the next career leap. “I just basically went up to Roger one day and said, ‘I’d like to direct second unit on this.’ The film [Galaxy of Terror, 1981] that we were making at the time was a low budget-science fiction horror picture. And he game me a camera and a couple, two or three people, and we started a little second unit which basically became this steam roller that wound up shooting about a third of the picture because they were falling way behind on the first unit.”
Cameron fondly remembers the challenge of producing low-budget movies. “The funny thing was there was a real technical esprit de corps on the two Corman films I worked on. People didn’t like there to be obvious mistakes. But there was a limit to how good something could be, how good the acting was when you only get one or two takes and no rehearsal. The threadbare nature of the coverage and what we had to work with made it interesting.”
Hired to be the special effects director for Piranha II: The Spawning (1981), James Cameron found himself taking over when the original helmer left the project. Hampered by a non-English speaking Italian production crew, the experience became one of utter frustration for Cameron. “We were shooting in Jamaica and the dailies would go to New York and be processed. He [executive producer Ovidio G. Assonitis] would fly to New York and look at them and not send them back for me to see, so I wasn’t even seeing my own film. He came in and said, ‘Your stuff doesn’t work, doesn’t cut together. It’s a pile of junk and you’re off the movie,’ and then he took over the film.” After the unceremonious firing, James Cameron committed an act which has become a part of film folklore. “A couple of months later I went to Rome to find out what really happened, and he wouldn’t show me any of the film. I had been in Rome prepping the film for a couple of weeks before we went to Jamaica, and I remembered the code to get in. So I went in and ran the film for myself. It wasn’t that bad. All I wanted to know was one simple fact. Could I or could I not do this job?”
While in Italy, Cameron had a nightmare about a crippled robot from the future, hunting down its maimed female prey; the haunting image would provide him with the cinematic concept which would establish him as a Hollywood filmmaker.
Read part two and three.
Short Film Showcase - Xenogenesis (1978)
For more on James Cameron, visit JamesCameronOnline or James Cameron's Movies & Creations blog. For more on Avatar, visit the official site.
Trevor Hogg is a freelance video editor and writer who currently resides in Canada.
Growing up in a small Ontario town located on the banks of the Chippawa Creek, James Cameron developed a fascination with water. Along with the natural landscape, the adolescent was greatly influenced by his parents. “My mother was a housewife but she was also an artist,” stated Cameron. “My father was an electrical engineer [at a paper mill]. So right there you have a collision of left and right hemisphere thinking and I think I got equal parts of both.”
Fueling the childhood imagination of the Canadian filmmaker were the works of Arthur C. Clarke, A.E. Van Vogt, Harlan Ellison, and Larry Niven. “I spent all my free time in the town library and I read an awful lot of science fiction and the line between reality and fantasy blurred. I was as interested in the reality of biology as I was in reading science fiction stories about genetic mutations and post-nuclear war environments and inter-stellar traveling, [and] meeting alien races.”
Attending Stamford Collegiate, the teenager found himself an outsider in an athletic oriented high school. “The critical moment for me was in 11th grade. My biology teacher, Mr. McKenzie, decided that what our school needed was a theatre arts program and we didn’t have it.” The newly established academic endeavor introduced Cameron to the rigors of creating a theatrical show. “We had to build the props and the scenery and the costumes and do everything ourselves. We had to turn the stage into a proper working stage. It took a year, but we started putting on our own productions.”
Even though the experience inspired him, James Cameron still remained a man of science. “All the way through high school, even into college, I majored in physics.” But the situation dramatically changed for the undergrad student who had moved to California along with his family in 1971. “I hit kind of a wall with math. I had a bad teacher who turned me off of calculus at a critical moment, and even though my grades were very high in astronomy and physics, I switched to English because I wanted to write.”
Shifting his academic focus allowed Cameron to bridge the gap between his artistic and scientific inclinations. “What finally attracted me to film in such a definitive way was…it was the only place I could reconcile the need to tell stories and to work in a visual art medium, and the desire to understand things at a technological level – and my fascination with engineering and technology.”
Dropping out of Fullerton College, James Cameron married his first wife Sharon Williams and drove a truck for the local school district. But not all was lost for the aspiring moviemaker. “I was in a small group of people who went to see every single science fiction film,” recollected Cameron. “When Star Wars (1977) came out, everybody wanted to catch that wave, but nobody knew how to do it. There was a group of guys who wanted to make a low-budget movie as a tax shelter. A friend of mine got involved with them pitching ideas like The Sorority Massacre type of stuff. He called me up and said, ‘Hey, have you got any ideas?’ I said, ‘Yeah, I’ve got a couple.’’
Impressed with the story proposal, the investors wanted James Cameron to develop it further. “We shot some test shots in 16 m.m. and put together a little demo film. They liked that. Then they gave us another $20,000 to do a teaser that was meant to be part of a proposal to raise more money from a group of general partners. We shot a twelve-minute film with a lot of animation, visual effects, [and] matte paintings. We taught ourselves how to do it. For me, that was really the transition to being a filmmaker. To do that I had to quit my job driving a truck and work on that all the time.”
Xenogenesis (1978) is a science fiction short film in which a man (William Wisher Jr.) from the future battles with an armored robot. The plan to produce a feature length version never happened, however, the project did enable its originator to get a job sculpting models for a B-movie mogul, Roger Corman.
“I found I did pretty well in a chaotic environment,” stated Cameron of his time at New World Pictures during the early 1980s. “I could manipulate the situation to position myself to (a) learn what I needed to learn, (b) do what I wanted to do, and (c) advance to the next level. If they gave me the credits I should have gotten on that picture [Battle Beyond the Stars, 1980], I would have gotten five or six. I did matte paintings, was a visual effects cameraman, ran my own visual effects motion control unit, designed and built three-quarters of the sets as art director. I was a model builder and designed and built a front projection system. I operated it on the first day of shooting, then turned it over to some other people and went on to be art director. I was skipping from one job to another.”
Realizing that he had the stamina for the work and a basic understanding of filmmaking, James Cameron decided to take the next career leap. “I just basically went up to Roger one day and said, ‘I’d like to direct second unit on this.’ The film [Galaxy of Terror, 1981] that we were making at the time was a low budget-science fiction horror picture. And he game me a camera and a couple, two or three people, and we started a little second unit which basically became this steam roller that wound up shooting about a third of the picture because they were falling way behind on the first unit.”
Cameron fondly remembers the challenge of producing low-budget movies. “The funny thing was there was a real technical esprit de corps on the two Corman films I worked on. People didn’t like there to be obvious mistakes. But there was a limit to how good something could be, how good the acting was when you only get one or two takes and no rehearsal. The threadbare nature of the coverage and what we had to work with made it interesting.”
Hired to be the special effects director for Piranha II: The Spawning (1981), James Cameron found himself taking over when the original helmer left the project. Hampered by a non-English speaking Italian production crew, the experience became one of utter frustration for Cameron. “We were shooting in Jamaica and the dailies would go to New York and be processed. He [executive producer Ovidio G. Assonitis] would fly to New York and look at them and not send them back for me to see, so I wasn’t even seeing my own film. He came in and said, ‘Your stuff doesn’t work, doesn’t cut together. It’s a pile of junk and you’re off the movie,’ and then he took over the film.” After the unceremonious firing, James Cameron committed an act which has become a part of film folklore. “A couple of months later I went to Rome to find out what really happened, and he wouldn’t show me any of the film. I had been in Rome prepping the film for a couple of weeks before we went to Jamaica, and I remembered the code to get in. So I went in and ran the film for myself. It wasn’t that bad. All I wanted to know was one simple fact. Could I or could I not do this job?”
While in Italy, Cameron had a nightmare about a crippled robot from the future, hunting down its maimed female prey; the haunting image would provide him with the cinematic concept which would establish him as a Hollywood filmmaker.
Read part two and three.
Short Film Showcase - Xenogenesis (1978)
For more on James Cameron, visit JamesCameronOnline or James Cameron's Movies & Creations blog. For more on Avatar, visit the official site.
Trevor Hogg is a freelance video editor and writer who currently resides in Canada.
Monday, November 23, 2009
UK Box Office Top Ten - weekend commencing 20/11/09
UK box office top ten and analysis for the weekend of Friday 20th - Sunday 22nd November 2009.
The latest adaptation from US author Stephenie Meyer's bestselling vampire romance series, The Twight Saga: New Moon jumps straight to the top of the UK box office with a blockbuster haul of £11,683,158. Banking more than four times the debut weekend of last year's Twilight (and already beating out its entire box office run), New Moon's opening is second only to Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince this year.
Despite the heavy opening for New Moon, two other films also enjoyed healthy weekends; in second place Roland Emmerich disaster-overload 2012 scoops another £3.5m to push its two-week gross close to £13m, while Disney's A Christmas Carol tops its debut weekend for the second week running and looks set to dig in for the festive season. Michael Caine vigilante effort Harry Brown and Pixar's smash-hit Up round out the top five, although both earned considerably less than the films above them.
Joel and Ethan Coen's latest dark comedy A Serious Man received only a limited release but managed to beat out Steven Soderbergh's The Informant! by two places to open in seventh, despite playing on half the screens and without a star name such as Matt Damon to headline. Elsewhere in the chart Wes Anderson's version of the Roald Dahl classic Fantastic Mr. Fox holds onto sixth spot for the third consecutive week, with comedy The Men Who Stare at Goats slipping two places to seventh and alien abduction thriller The Fourth Kind remaining stationary in ninth.
Incoming...
Oren Peli's low-budget US smash hit Paranormal Activity finally makes its way to UK screens this Wednesday and will look to capitalise on its hype to stand as the main challenger to New Moon's dominance at the top of the box office. Meanwhile on Friday, director F. Gary Gray releases his latest crime thriller Law Abiding Citizen starring Gerard Butler and Jamie Foxx, along with family comedy Nativity, featuring a host of British talent including Martin Freeeman, Ashley Jensen, Pam Ferris, Ricky Tomlinson and Alan Carr.
U.K. Box Office Archive
The latest adaptation from US author Stephenie Meyer's bestselling vampire romance series, The Twight Saga: New Moon jumps straight to the top of the UK box office with a blockbuster haul of £11,683,158. Banking more than four times the debut weekend of last year's Twilight (and already beating out its entire box office run), New Moon's opening is second only to Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince this year.
Despite the heavy opening for New Moon, two other films also enjoyed healthy weekends; in second place Roland Emmerich disaster-overload 2012 scoops another £3.5m to push its two-week gross close to £13m, while Disney's A Christmas Carol tops its debut weekend for the second week running and looks set to dig in for the festive season. Michael Caine vigilante effort Harry Brown and Pixar's smash-hit Up round out the top five, although both earned considerably less than the films above them.
Joel and Ethan Coen's latest dark comedy A Serious Man received only a limited release but managed to beat out Steven Soderbergh's The Informant! by two places to open in seventh, despite playing on half the screens and without a star name such as Matt Damon to headline. Elsewhere in the chart Wes Anderson's version of the Roald Dahl classic Fantastic Mr. Fox holds onto sixth spot for the third consecutive week, with comedy The Men Who Stare at Goats slipping two places to seventh and alien abduction thriller The Fourth Kind remaining stationary in ninth.
Pos. | Film | Weekend Gross | Week | Total UK Gross |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | The Twilight Saga: New Moon | £11,683,158 | 1 | £11,683,158 |
2 | 2012 | £3,496,202 | 2 | £12,923,681 |
3 | A Christmas Carol | £2,224,044 | 3 | £8,553,363 |
4 | Harry Brown | £724,627 | 2 | £2,704,205 |
5 | Up | £642,134 | 7 | £33,561,384 |
6 | Fantastic Mr Fox | £454,088 | 5 | £8,289,695 |
7 | The Men Who Stare at Goats | £430,319 | 3 | £3,613,831 |
8 | A Serious Man | £321,114 | 1 | £321,114 |
9 | The Fourth Kind | £181,105 | 3 | £2,251,107 |
10 | The Informant! | £179,612 | 1 | £179,612 |
Incoming...
Oren Peli's low-budget US smash hit Paranormal Activity finally makes its way to UK screens this Wednesday and will look to capitalise on its hype to stand as the main challenger to New Moon's dominance at the top of the box office. Meanwhile on Friday, director F. Gary Gray releases his latest crime thriller Law Abiding Citizen starring Gerard Butler and Jamie Foxx, along with family comedy Nativity, featuring a host of British talent including Martin Freeeman, Ashley Jensen, Pam Ferris, Ricky Tomlinson and Alan Carr.
U.K. Box Office Archive
Sunday, November 22, 2009
I Sat Through That? #20 - Six Minutes of Runaway Bride
In which Gerry Hayes falls in love with Roberts and Gere all over again, just like it says on the poster...
Runaway Bride, 1999.
Directed by Garry Marshall.
Starring Julia Roberts, Richard Gere, Joan Cusack, probably others - I didn’t really see.
Written by Josaan McGibbon and Sara Parriott.
You read that title correctly. After whinging and bellyaching, last week, about Peter Jackson stealing (I don’t use that word lightly) hours, days, weeks of my life with his interminable pish, this week’s I Sat Through That? concerns approximately six minutes of a film. During the week, while flicking up and down the channels desperately trying to find something, anything, worth watching, I had the good fortune to land on the dénouement of Runaway Bride. I say “good fortune” because, within the time it took my finger to cease it’s unrelenting, channel-hopping presses, I knew that I had this week’s column all sorted out.
I watched about six minutes of Runaway Bride.
That was enough - much more than enough - to make it worthy of my complaining about sitting through it (and don’t get all smartarsed, saying “oh, but you could have turned it off” - nobody likes a smartarse - take it from me).
I had a quick look on the net to research it - I’m nothing if not diligent - and by an extraordinary measure of good luck, I found the end of Runaway Bride on YouTube. You can look at it here or on the player below. Honestly, I’m not making this up - this is almost exactly where I came in.
Obviously, if you haven’t seen the film and don’t want to see - or hear about - the last six minutes because you really, really hope to see it in the future, you should probably go away. Not because I’m worried about spoiling it for you - you should just go away.
I came in as Roberts and Gere were having one of those ‘serious conversations’ out on the most fake-looking balcony I’ve ever seen. Honestly, there are school productions of Romeo and Juliet with more convincing balconies and there are daytime soap-operas made with a budget less than the cost of a cup of tea and a bacon sandwich that have more realistic and natural lighting.
So Roberts (who should never wear a turtle-neck - her head and neck appear to be all part of the same long, weird protrusion), gives Gere a stinking pair of running shoes. ‘Cos she’s the runaway bride. Get it. It’s symbolic n’ stuff. At least I think it is - I missed the start you see.
Then she proposes in a sickening, candied, Hollywood manner (listen to where the violins come in on “I guarantee we’ll have tough times”). He puts on some mellow jazz on his (of course) retro sound system like a giant, grey-haired cliché and they dance.
Nauseating, right?
Right. But I could have forgiven it (just), if not for what followed. An achingly awful wedding scene on top of a frickin’ hill with autumn leaves all around. Please. Stomach-churning.
But wait. They’re not done making me sick. The music reaches a crescendo and... What’s that? Why, it’s all their friends running up the hill towards them, clapping and cheering as they come. There goes that delicious Thai curry I had for dinner.
As they ride off on horses (maybe it makes sense if you’ve seen the rest of the film), Joan Cusack, signals the end credits by screaming annoyingly into a phone and a montage of execrable, cringeworthy scenes of staggering odiousness follows...
Gape, dumbstruck, at a choir spontaneously bursting into a chorus of Hallelujahs as they hear the news. Wonder at the baker-woman throwing flour in the air and marching inanely. Rub your eyes to make sure you’ve really seen the priest and nuns running joyously across a field. Cower, repeating “no, no, they wouldn’t...” as you watch the quirky granny running/knitting because you know - you just know - they’ll have her turn and follow that hunky looking bloke. Wish, wish harder than you’ve ever wished, that you could be close enough to that bloke with the guitar to punch him in the conk.
Six minutes.
More traumatic and damaging than anything Peter Jackson has done. Peter, all is forgiven - I’ll even go and watch your two-and-a-half day director’s cut of The Hobbit when it’s out.
Six minutes of Runaway Bride...
Read more I Sat Through That? right here.
Gerry Hayes is a garret-dwelling writer subsisting on tea, beer and Flame-Grilled Steak flavour McCoy’s crisps. You can read about other stuff he doesn't like on his blog at http://stareintospace.com or you can have easy, bite-sized bits of him at http://twitter.com/gerryhayes
Runaway Bride, 1999.
Directed by Garry Marshall.
Starring Julia Roberts, Richard Gere, Joan Cusack, probably others - I didn’t really see.
Written by Josaan McGibbon and Sara Parriott.
You read that title correctly. After whinging and bellyaching, last week, about Peter Jackson stealing (I don’t use that word lightly) hours, days, weeks of my life with his interminable pish, this week’s I Sat Through That? concerns approximately six minutes of a film. During the week, while flicking up and down the channels desperately trying to find something, anything, worth watching, I had the good fortune to land on the dénouement of Runaway Bride. I say “good fortune” because, within the time it took my finger to cease it’s unrelenting, channel-hopping presses, I knew that I had this week’s column all sorted out.
I watched about six minutes of Runaway Bride.
That was enough - much more than enough - to make it worthy of my complaining about sitting through it (and don’t get all smartarsed, saying “oh, but you could have turned it off” - nobody likes a smartarse - take it from me).
I had a quick look on the net to research it - I’m nothing if not diligent - and by an extraordinary measure of good luck, I found the end of Runaway Bride on YouTube. You can look at it here or on the player below. Honestly, I’m not making this up - this is almost exactly where I came in.
Obviously, if you haven’t seen the film and don’t want to see - or hear about - the last six minutes because you really, really hope to see it in the future, you should probably go away. Not because I’m worried about spoiling it for you - you should just go away.
I came in as Roberts and Gere were having one of those ‘serious conversations’ out on the most fake-looking balcony I’ve ever seen. Honestly, there are school productions of Romeo and Juliet with more convincing balconies and there are daytime soap-operas made with a budget less than the cost of a cup of tea and a bacon sandwich that have more realistic and natural lighting.
So Roberts (who should never wear a turtle-neck - her head and neck appear to be all part of the same long, weird protrusion), gives Gere a stinking pair of running shoes. ‘Cos she’s the runaway bride. Get it. It’s symbolic n’ stuff. At least I think it is - I missed the start you see.
Then she proposes in a sickening, candied, Hollywood manner (listen to where the violins come in on “I guarantee we’ll have tough times”). He puts on some mellow jazz on his (of course) retro sound system like a giant, grey-haired cliché and they dance.
Nauseating, right?
Right. But I could have forgiven it (just), if not for what followed. An achingly awful wedding scene on top of a frickin’ hill with autumn leaves all around. Please. Stomach-churning.
But wait. They’re not done making me sick. The music reaches a crescendo and... What’s that? Why, it’s all their friends running up the hill towards them, clapping and cheering as they come. There goes that delicious Thai curry I had for dinner.
As they ride off on horses (maybe it makes sense if you’ve seen the rest of the film), Joan Cusack, signals the end credits by screaming annoyingly into a phone and a montage of execrable, cringeworthy scenes of staggering odiousness follows...
Gape, dumbstruck, at a choir spontaneously bursting into a chorus of Hallelujahs as they hear the news. Wonder at the baker-woman throwing flour in the air and marching inanely. Rub your eyes to make sure you’ve really seen the priest and nuns running joyously across a field. Cower, repeating “no, no, they wouldn’t...” as you watch the quirky granny running/knitting because you know - you just know - they’ll have her turn and follow that hunky looking bloke. Wish, wish harder than you’ve ever wished, that you could be close enough to that bloke with the guitar to punch him in the conk.
Six minutes.
More traumatic and damaging than anything Peter Jackson has done. Peter, all is forgiven - I’ll even go and watch your two-and-a-half day director’s cut of The Hobbit when it’s out.
Six minutes of Runaway Bride...
Read more I Sat Through That? right here.
Gerry Hayes is a garret-dwelling writer subsisting on tea, beer and Flame-Grilled Steak flavour McCoy’s crisps. You can read about other stuff he doesn't like on his blog at http://stareintospace.com or you can have easy, bite-sized bits of him at http://twitter.com/gerryhayes
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Movies... For Free! The Intruder (1962)
"Movies... For Free!", showcasing classic movies that have fallen out of copyright and are available freely from the public domain (with streaming video!)...
The Intruder a.k.a. Shame (reissue) a.k.a. I Hate Your Guts (reissue) a.k.a. The Stranger (UK), 1962.
Directed by Roger Corman.
Starring William Shatner.
Legendary low-budget filmmaker Roger Corman produces and directs this 1962 drama about segregation and racial tensions in the American South. The film stars a pre-Star Trek William Shatner in the lead role of Adam Cramer, a racist who sets about to incite hatred against the black minority of the fictitious small town of Caxton as they prepare to integrate the local high school. Using his charm to manipulate the views of many of the townsfolk, Cramer's extremism culminates in the creation of a lynch mob, with only a handful of residents brave enough stand against the violence.
Despite being regarded by many as one of his best movies, The Intruder is the only picture in his catalogue where Corman admits to losing money, with the film released under a number of different titles in an effort to turn a profit. Corman blamed William Shatner's performance - far removed from his now familiar persona - for the film's poor box-office, with Shatner later joking that the title I Hate Your Guts was aimed towards him. Nevertheless, the film makes for memorable - albeit disturbing - viewing due to its controversial themes and edgy content.
Embed courtesy of Internet Archive.
Related:
The Fast and the Furious (1955)
Little Shop of Horrors (1960)
The Last Woman on Earth (1960)
Dementia 13 (1963)
Click here to view all entries in our Movies... For Free! collection.
The Intruder a.k.a. Shame (reissue) a.k.a. I Hate Your Guts (reissue) a.k.a. The Stranger (UK), 1962.
Directed by Roger Corman.
Starring William Shatner.
Legendary low-budget filmmaker Roger Corman produces and directs this 1962 drama about segregation and racial tensions in the American South. The film stars a pre-Star Trek William Shatner in the lead role of Adam Cramer, a racist who sets about to incite hatred against the black minority of the fictitious small town of Caxton as they prepare to integrate the local high school. Using his charm to manipulate the views of many of the townsfolk, Cramer's extremism culminates in the creation of a lynch mob, with only a handful of residents brave enough stand against the violence.
Despite being regarded by many as one of his best movies, The Intruder is the only picture in his catalogue where Corman admits to losing money, with the film released under a number of different titles in an effort to turn a profit. Corman blamed William Shatner's performance - far removed from his now familiar persona - for the film's poor box-office, with Shatner later joking that the title I Hate Your Guts was aimed towards him. Nevertheless, the film makes for memorable - albeit disturbing - viewing due to its controversial themes and edgy content.
Embed courtesy of Internet Archive.
Related:
The Fast and the Furious (1955)
Little Shop of Horrors (1960)
The Last Woman on Earth (1960)
Dementia 13 (1963)
Click here to view all entries in our Movies... For Free! collection.
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Five Essential... John Candy Films
Gary Collinson selects his Five Essential John Candy films…
Canadian funnyman John Candy was one of the biggest – both literally and figuratively – comic stars of the 1980s, working alongside a host of respected directors and acting talent. Honing his skills on The Second City Toronto comedy circuit, Candy gained widespread attention as a cast member on the sketch show Second City TV alongside the likes of Harold Ramis, Martin Short, Eugene Levy and Catherine O’Hara, before moving on to enjoy a successful film career. After battling weight problems for much of his life, Candy’s career was tragically cut short in 1994 when he suffered a fatal heart attack during the filming of Wagons East!. Here, we present five of his best offerings…
5. Cool Runnings (1993, dir. Jon Turteltaub)
Candy stars as disgraced bobsled Olympian Irv Blitzer, stripped of two gold medals in the 1972 Winter Olympics due to cheating and given a chance at redemption sixteen years later as the coach of a newly formed Jamaican team. Loosely based on the actual story of the first Jamaican bobsled team, the film’s feel-good nature and warm humour allows it to overcome a fairly generic ‘underdog’ formula, while Candy is on form as Blitzer in one of his final roles (and certainly his last box office success, with studio Disney banking international receipts in excess of $150m).
4. Who’s Harry Crumb? (1989, dir. Paul Flaherty)
Inept private investigator Harry Crumb (Candy) is given the assignment to track down a wealthy millionaire’s kidnapped daughter by his boss Eliot Draisen (Jeffrey Jones), who also happens to be the mastermind behind the crime. Who’s Harry Crumb? provides a consistent flow of witty one-liners, humourous gags and physical comedy, with Candy (who also serves as executive-producer) hilarious as the hapless private eye. Saw’s Shawnee Smith makes an early appearance as Harry’s sidekick, while Candy reunites with director Paul Flaherty, a writer on SCTV.
3. Uncle Buck (1989, dir. John Hughes)
The first John Hughes film to appear on this list, Uncle Buck sees Candy as loutish slacker Buck Russell, who ends up babysitting his brother’s kids when the parents are forced to leave town for a family emergency. Forming a memorable double act with an eight-year-old Macaulay Culkin (who gained international fame the following year through Home Alone, with Hughes producing and Candy making a minor appearance) the role of the slobbish but warm-hearted Buck is perfectly suited to Candy’s sarcastic comic talents. Perhaps Hughes' most underrated effort.
2. Spaceballs (1987, dir. Mel Brooks)
Although Candy is just one of an array of comic talents on display in Mel Brooks’ parody of Star Wars, the sheer hilarity and outright silliness of Spaceballs makes this cult classic a strong contender for first place on the list. Candy plays half-man, half-dog Barf - Chewbacca to Lone Starr’s (Bill Pullman) Han Solo, with the pair setting out to rescue Princess Vespa (Daphne Zuniga) from the clutches of Dark Helmet (Rick Moranis) and the Spaceballs. A real side-splitter, and the first of two films that would make 1987 thegreatest year of John Candy’s career…
1. Planes, Trains & Automobiles (1987, dir. John Hughes)
Director John Hughes’ shift from teen comedy to more adult-orientated material resulted in quite simply one of the best comedies of the decade, Planes, Trains & Automobiles. Trying to make it home to his family in time for Thanksgiving, advertising executive Neal Page (Steve Martin) is forced to travel across the country with annoying ‘shower curtain guy’ Del Griffith (Candy), who leads him from one disastrous mishap to another. A true classic, Planes, Trains & Automobiles is the essential John Candy film, while the same could probably be of both Martin and Hughes.
Honourable Mentions…
Stripes (1981, dir. Ivan Reitman)
Brewster’s Millions (1985, dir. Walter Hill)
Armed and Dangerous (1986, dir. Mark L. Lester)
The Great Outdoors (1988, dir. Howard Deutch)
Only the Lonely (1991, dir. Chris Columbus)
One final note - naturally the list omits bit-parts and cameos such as Vacation (1983, dir. Harold Ramis) and Home Alone (1990, dir. Chris Columbus), along with Oliver Stone’s JFK (1991), in which Candy shines in a rare dramatic performance.
Agree? Disagree? We'd love to hear your comments on the list...
Gary Collinson
Essentials Archive
Canadian funnyman John Candy was one of the biggest – both literally and figuratively – comic stars of the 1980s, working alongside a host of respected directors and acting talent. Honing his skills on The Second City Toronto comedy circuit, Candy gained widespread attention as a cast member on the sketch show Second City TV alongside the likes of Harold Ramis, Martin Short, Eugene Levy and Catherine O’Hara, before moving on to enjoy a successful film career. After battling weight problems for much of his life, Candy’s career was tragically cut short in 1994 when he suffered a fatal heart attack during the filming of Wagons East!. Here, we present five of his best offerings…
5. Cool Runnings (1993, dir. Jon Turteltaub)
Candy stars as disgraced bobsled Olympian Irv Blitzer, stripped of two gold medals in the 1972 Winter Olympics due to cheating and given a chance at redemption sixteen years later as the coach of a newly formed Jamaican team. Loosely based on the actual story of the first Jamaican bobsled team, the film’s feel-good nature and warm humour allows it to overcome a fairly generic ‘underdog’ formula, while Candy is on form as Blitzer in one of his final roles (and certainly his last box office success, with studio Disney banking international receipts in excess of $150m).
4. Who’s Harry Crumb? (1989, dir. Paul Flaherty)
Inept private investigator Harry Crumb (Candy) is given the assignment to track down a wealthy millionaire’s kidnapped daughter by his boss Eliot Draisen (Jeffrey Jones), who also happens to be the mastermind behind the crime. Who’s Harry Crumb? provides a consistent flow of witty one-liners, humourous gags and physical comedy, with Candy (who also serves as executive-producer) hilarious as the hapless private eye. Saw’s Shawnee Smith makes an early appearance as Harry’s sidekick, while Candy reunites with director Paul Flaherty, a writer on SCTV.
3. Uncle Buck (1989, dir. John Hughes)
The first John Hughes film to appear on this list, Uncle Buck sees Candy as loutish slacker Buck Russell, who ends up babysitting his brother’s kids when the parents are forced to leave town for a family emergency. Forming a memorable double act with an eight-year-old Macaulay Culkin (who gained international fame the following year through Home Alone, with Hughes producing and Candy making a minor appearance) the role of the slobbish but warm-hearted Buck is perfectly suited to Candy’s sarcastic comic talents. Perhaps Hughes' most underrated effort.
2. Spaceballs (1987, dir. Mel Brooks)
Although Candy is just one of an array of comic talents on display in Mel Brooks’ parody of Star Wars, the sheer hilarity and outright silliness of Spaceballs makes this cult classic a strong contender for first place on the list. Candy plays half-man, half-dog Barf - Chewbacca to Lone Starr’s (Bill Pullman) Han Solo, with the pair setting out to rescue Princess Vespa (Daphne Zuniga) from the clutches of Dark Helmet (Rick Moranis) and the Spaceballs. A real side-splitter, and the first of two films that would make 1987 thegreatest year of John Candy’s career…
1. Planes, Trains & Automobiles (1987, dir. John Hughes)
Director John Hughes’ shift from teen comedy to more adult-orientated material resulted in quite simply one of the best comedies of the decade, Planes, Trains & Automobiles. Trying to make it home to his family in time for Thanksgiving, advertising executive Neal Page (Steve Martin) is forced to travel across the country with annoying ‘shower curtain guy’ Del Griffith (Candy), who leads him from one disastrous mishap to another. A true classic, Planes, Trains & Automobiles is the essential John Candy film, while the same could probably be of both Martin and Hughes.
Honourable Mentions…
Stripes (1981, dir. Ivan Reitman)
Brewster’s Millions (1985, dir. Walter Hill)
Armed and Dangerous (1986, dir. Mark L. Lester)
The Great Outdoors (1988, dir. Howard Deutch)
Only the Lonely (1991, dir. Chris Columbus)
One final note - naturally the list omits bit-parts and cameos such as Vacation (1983, dir. Harold Ramis) and Home Alone (1990, dir. Chris Columbus), along with Oliver Stone’s JFK (1991), in which Candy shines in a rare dramatic performance.
Agree? Disagree? We'd love to hear your comments on the list...
Gary Collinson
Essentials Archive
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Animated Storytellers: A Pixar Animation Studios Profile (Part 3)
In the final instalment of a three-part article on the phenomenally successful animation studio, Trevor Hogg details Pixar's merger with entertainment powerhouse Disney and continued critical and commercial success... be sure to read part 1 and part 2.
Fostering a creative rapport between co-workers is something that Pixar goes out of its way to achieve. “We work hard on culture here,” explained the animation studio’s co-founder and president Edwin Catmull. “When you go into other studios, you’ll find that most are either artistically driven or technically driven. We’ve tried hard to make sure that our technical people and creative people are peers. We’ve found that when the technology is strong, it inspires the artists. And when the artists are strong, they challenge the technology. The result is that our artists and technical people appreciate each other talents.” One of the ways the animation studio sets about establishing a sense of camaraderie is through education. “Another thing we do when people [artists and technicians] come on board is send them to Pixar University,” revealed Catmull. “This is a ten-week classroom program to teach people how to use our tools and to cross-train them. So we’ve got classes in filmmaking, sculpting, drawing, painting, and improvisation.” The benefits of the unique initiative have proven to be indispensable. “One of the effects Pixar University has on the culture is that it makes people less self-conscious about their work and gets them comfortable with being publicly reviewed.”
Breaking from his normal routine of promoting internal candidates, the Pixar’s co-founder and creative wizard John Lasseter decided to hand over the directorial reins of the next project to his former CalArts classmate Brad Bird. Recalling the animator who was responsible for the critically praised The Iron Giant (1999), Lasseter stated, “Brad would hang out all night taking about Scorsese [Raging Bull] and Coppola [The Conversation] and how he could do what they do with animation.” Pursuing his career ambition of moving beyond the children fairy tales and producing stories with a more adult sensibility had not been an easy one for Brad Bird. “I kept having these movies get on the runway, then they would never get cleared for takeoff,” recalled Bird. “My guy would get fired. Then, of course, the new guy wouldn’t want to deal with something the old guy had done. Or a film that was vaguely like something I was working on would tank at the box office.” The frustration caused the independent-minded animator to seek out an organization known for developing and producing its own pictures. “I think the thing that made me want to come to Pixar was not the technology, but the fact that they protect their stories. They want original stories and they allow you to develop them without focus grouping stuff to death, or making you take out everything that is interesting. It’s a little pocket of sanity in a crazy business.”
Whereas previous Pixar films had made use of multiple contributors, Brad Bird adopted a singular approach to his scriptwriting and directing for The Incredibles (2004). Creating a movie about a family of superheroes was a risky proposition for the company. “It is a totally different challenge,” remarked Edwin Catmull. “The humans in our previous films were not the strongest element.” Rather than recreating the minute details of human skin such as pores and hair follicles, the decision was made to render the main characters in a stylized cartoon manner. “The hardest thing about The Incredibles was that there was no hardest thing,” declared supervising technical director Rick Sayre. “Brad ordered a heaping helping of everything on the menu. We’ve got it all: fire, water, air, smoke, steam, explosions, and by the way humans…Getting hair to work at all and to move, and clothing, and then doing for it for a big ensemble cast. It’s a Pixar compendium.”
Brad Bird devised a tale about a superhero in the witness protection plan who attempts to recapture his glory days, only to find himself in need of being saved by his wife and his children. “The dad is always expected in the family to be strong, so I made him strong,” explained Bird. “The moms are always pulled in a million different directions, so I made her stretch like taffy. Teenagers, particularly teenage girls, are insecure and defensive, so I made her turn invisible and turn on shields. And ten-year-old boys are hyperactive energy balls. Babies are unrealized potential.”
Following the tradition of Pixar employees providing some of voices for the animated characters, Brad Bird made a memorable appearance as the pint-sized fashion designer with a Herculaneum ego, Edna Mode. Comparisons with Watchmen, a graphic novel by Alan Moore, which also featured exiled superheroes who were hunted down and killed, caused Bird to respond that the similarities were coincidental since he had never read the book.
Aided by the voice talent of Craig T. Nelson (The Killing Fields), Holly Hunter (Broadcast News), Samuel L. Jackson (The Negotiator), Elizabeth Peña (Lone Star), and Jason Lee (Almost Famous), the picture grossed $261 million domestically and $631 million worldwide. At the Academy Awards, The Incredibles won for Best Animated Feature and Best Sound Editing, and received a nomination for Best Original Screenplay.
One Man Band (2005), a short film about a street performer named Bass who competes with a rival for a large gold coin, features no dialogue, only music; it received an Oscar nomination for Best Animated Short.
Buoyed by Pixar’s growing reputation for producing quality and commercially successful films, Steve Jobs was determined to obtain autonomy for the animation studio. “The truth is that there has been little creative collaboration with Disney for years,” declared Jobs. “Not even Disney’s marketing and brand could turn Disney’s last two animated films, Treasure Planet [2002] and Brother Bear [2003], into successes.” The threat of an impending divorce sparked Disney shareholders to revolt which led to the ousting of Michael Eisner as CEO. The departure of Eisner set the groundwork for a momentous deal which occurred on January 26, 2006. A stock swap between the two companies saw Disney agree to acquire Pixar for the amount of $7.4 billion. Edwin Catmull was installed as the president of the new animation organization while his colleague John Lasseter was rewarded with the position of Chief Creative Officer.
Taking inspiration from a cross-country road trip with his wife and five children, John Lasseter went about developing the next project for Pixar. In Cars (2006), a hotshot racecar gets lost in a rundown town called Radiator Springs on its way to a major competition at the Los Angeles International Speedway. Featured in the cast of characters are actual racecar drivers Paul Newman (The Sting), and Richard Petty. The protagonist Lightning McQueen (Owen Wilson) was named in honour of supervising animator Glenn McQueen who had died in 2002.
To create Radiator Springs some research was conducted by the likes of production designer Bob Pauley. “Typically, we’d go into a town and we’d hear all these wonderful stories from the locals. We’d soak it all in while getting a haircut at the barbershop, or enjoying a snow cone, or taking the challenge to eat a 72-ounce steak at the Big Texan.”
When designing the various vehicles, Pauley was given very specific instructions. “From the beginning of this project, John Lasseter had it in his mind to have the eyes be in the windshield. For one thing, it separates the characters from the more common approach where you have little cartoon eyes in the headlights. For another, he thought that having eyes down near the mouth at the front end of the car feels more like a snake. With the eyes set in the windshield, the point-of-view is more human-like, and made it feel like the whole car could be involved with the animation of the character.”
Cars received a mixed reception from the film critics. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer wrote that the picture was “one of Pixar’s most imaginative and thoroughly appealing movies ever”; while Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times declared, “The movie is great to look at and a lot of fun but somehow lacks the extra push of other Pixar films.” Even with accusations that the imagery had hijacked the story, Cars accumulated $244 million in domestic box office receipts and $462 million worldwide. At the Academy Awards, the picture received Oscar nominations for Best Animated Feature and Best Original Song.
The short film Lifted (2007) was written and directed by seven-time Oscar winner Gary Rydstrom (Saving Private Ryan). To pass his examination, a young alien must abduct a sleeping farmer. Incorporating his experience as a sound editor and mixer, Rydstrom based the spacecraft’s control panel on a sound mixer’s console. The five-minute-long story received a nomination for Best Animated Short.
A problematic script about a rat named Remy who desires to become a French chef led to the story’s originator Jan Pinkava being replaced by Brad Bird. “When the heads of Pixar [Lasseter, Jobs, Catmull] came to me and said, ‘We’re in trouble here. The curtain is ready to go up on production of Ratatouille [2007] and we’ve got to get this story solved,’” recalled the movie’s director and co-writer. “I dropped what I was planning to do and jumped in to help out because I have a huge respect for those guys, and this really amazing company they’ve created.’
Bird found himself drawn to the main character. “I think we all have impossible dreams and we do what we can to pursue them – and Remy’s dream might be the ultimate impossible dream of them all.” Though enamored with the theme of the movie, the director diverged significantly from the initial concept. “The emotional core of the original story was not to [Bird’s] liking,” explained Pinkava, who subsequently left Pixar. “The character of Remy changed profoundly. He became more self-assured and straight-forward, confidently following his talent and passion for cooking, and working to overcome the obstacles to his dream. Left behind were the complexities of character: Remy’s own struggle with his identity as a rat, his betrayal of his family’s values, his awareness of the craziness of his desire to be part of an enemy world, his yearning for acceptance and frustration with living a lie in a kitchen, all culminating to his final ‘coming out’.”
When asked on how he would portray a city which has been the setting for countless films, Brad Bird answered, “Paris has been seen [in] many different ways, but never from a rat’s point-of-view.” He went on to add, “If we’re going to capture Paris, we aren’t trying to perfectly reproduce the actual Paris; we’re trying to reproduce the feeling of being in Paris.” As for the overall tone of the picture, Bird replied, “We were after a lush-looking film that was kind of sensuous, which is not what you connect with animation usually.”
Among the voice talents staring in the movie were actors Patton Oswalt (Magnolia), Lou Romano (Monkeybone), Ian Holm (Chariots of Fire), Peter O’Toole (Venus), Brian Dennehy (Presumed Innocent), and Janeane Garofalo (Cop Land). At the North American box office, Ratatouille grossed $206 million, while globally it made $624 million; the picture was awarded the Oscar for Best Animated Feature and received an Academy Awards nomination for Best Original Screenplay.
Maintaining its interest in producing short films, Pixar released Presto in 2008. Originally meant to be about a rabbit who suffers from stage fright, the tale was reworked to make the fury creature an uncooperative participant in a magic show. The five-minute-long story received an Oscar nomination for Best Animated Short.
“There was this lunch we had during Toy Story around ’94 and we were batting around just any idea we could think of to try and come up with what the next move would be,” explained Andrew Stanton, Pixar’s executive producer and chief screenwriter. “One of the sort of half-brained sentences was ‘Hey, we could do sci-fi. What if we did the last robot on Earth?.’” At the time, the concept was dismissed for being too arty because of the lack of dialogue. Stanton never abandoned his luncheon suggestion and in 2005 development started on what would become known as WALL-E (2008). Left alone on a garbage-strewn Earth, a waste disposal machine has an extraterrestrial encounter with a visiting female robot. Smitten, the title character hides onboard a luxury spaceship that takes his true love away.
“I’m not one of those people who comes up with a theme and then writes to it,” stated Stanton, the creator of the ninth picture for Pixar. “I like to go with natural things that seem to be firing, and then somewhere halfway I realize what the theme is. I realized that [what] I was pushing with these two programmed robots was their desire to try and figure out what the point of living was, and it took these really irrational acts of love for them to discover how they were built. And I said, ‘That’s it. That’s my theme. Irrational love defeats life’s programming.’”
Providing the otherworldly ambience for the movie was sound designer guru Ben Burtt, who gained international acclaim for his work on the Star Wars franchise. For a more nostalgic feel, Stanton added the classic song Hello, Dolly! to the opening sequence. “I always loved the idea of putting an old-fashioned song against space. I always loved the idea of the future against the past juxtaposed, and I just thought that was a great intro into the movie.”
When Andrew Stanton set about crafting the script, he was influenced by the unconventional format adopted by screenwriter Dan O’Bannon for Alien (1979). “He [O’Bannon] would do little four-to-eight-word descriptions and then sort of left-justify it and make it four lines each, little blocks, so it almost looked like haikus. It would create this rhythm in the readers where you would appreciate these silent visual moments as much as you would the dialogue on the page.” Stanton also referenced films made by Charlie Chaplin (The Great Dictator), Buster Keaton (The General), and Harold Lloyd (The Freshman) to aid in the cinematic storytelling.
The lack of dialogue did not diminish the box office reception for WALL-E; the picture earned $224 million domestically and $521 million worldwide. At the Academy Awards, the movie was honoured with the Oscar for Best Animated Feature and a nomination for Best Original Screenplay. However, not only the film was lauded at the prestigious Hollywood event; Edwin Catmull received the Gordon E. Sawyer Award, “for his lifetime of technical contributions and leadership in the field of computer graphics for the motion picture industry.”
Peter Docter relied on a simple human emotion when devising the tenth, but first 3-D feature to be produced by Pixar. “There are plenty of days when you hate humanity, you’re so sick to death of everybody and you want to get away – and at the end, you realize...what really makes the world go ‘round is human connection.” Up (2009) stars an embittered widower, Carl Fredricksen (Ed Asner), who attaches a series of helium balloons to his home in an attempt to fulfill a dream that he and his late wife once shared – becoming explorers like the famous Charles F. Muntz (Christopher Plummer). A complication arises when Carl discovers that he is not alone on his journey to South America; an overeager Wilderness Explorer named Russell (Jordan Nagai) is stranded on the front porch of the airborne house.
“It was fun playing with this sort of misanthropic character,” stated Docter, “but then trying to ask yourself the question ‘How did he get that way?’ and ‘What’s leading him to do what he’s doing?’” To enable audiences to better understand Carl, the movie starts with an emotional dialogue-free sequence which details his life with his beloved Ellie. To create the potent montage, Docter and his head writer Bob Peterson culled the experiences from their own married lives. “It’s funny, because a lot of people point at that [a grumpy old man] and say ‘Hmm, I don’t know if that’s relatable,’ but we’ve rats as main characters. We’ve had big hairy beasts with horns as the main character. We’ve had some pretty wild stuff, and it really comes down to creating something where you see a little bit of yourself in those characters."
Interestingly, it was not the action scenes in the Amazon jungle which posed the biggest problem for Pete Docter. “There was one [sequence] called ‘Muntz’s Lair’, which is where Carl has dinner with [the] Charles Muntz character. We must have rewritten or re-storyboarded that thing at least 50 times from scratch.” He went on to say, “That was our chance to really, in a very short amount of time, to explain…his back story.”
When he composes a screenplay, Docter adopts an open mind. “You start with ideas that appeal to you, and then as you work back and forth through the film you always find ways to set them up and pay them off and hopefully do it in a subtle enough way that as an audience member you’re not aware of that.” Then there is the matter of the unexpected. “There’s always a big surprise, some curveball that the story throws at you. It seemed like you totally knew what you were doing, and now you have no idea. But that’s the fun of it. If we knew what we were doing, then I don’t think the movies would be as good.”
Setting the right tone proved to be quite a challenge for the production team. “It was tricky, especially, shift gears from where you go from the scene where Carl and Ellie have their life together and then you transition into more comedy stuff,” mused Peter Docter. “How to get from one to the other without stepping on the other is really tricky but that’s something I think we really needed.” Docter does not make use of a singular vision when developing his movies. “I talk more generally about ‘he’s really thirsty – he hasn’t had a drink in three days,’ and other information they need to know about the scene, and let the animator bring his own acting choices to it and really make the picture much more rich because of it.”
With growing box office receipts of $293 domestically and $507 million worldwide, Up is favoured to win Best Animated Feature at the next Academy Awards.
Attached to the theatrical release of Up is another potential Oscar candidate for Pixar, the short film Partly Cloudy (2009). A lonely grey cloud is given the responsibility of creating animals which turn out to be belligerent; they are passed to a stork who delivers them to earth.
Fourteen years after gracing the big screen, Toy Story (followed by its sequel Toy Story 2) was released in the 3-D format. “We’ve all been big fans of 3-D over the years,” remarked Lee Unkrich, the supervising editor who assembled both Toy Story movies. “And really, until digital projection came into its own, just in the past few years, there was really no way, economically, to exhibit 3-D very effectively, have it look very good, or have it be cost-effective. And now, because so many theatres have digital projection, for the first time, we really can do it. That’s why you’re seeing so much 3-D stuff out there.” There is also another reason for the Pixar double-bill. “We want to build excitement for [Toy Story] 3 coming out. A lot of our audience has never seen the films on-screen in theatres.”
Scheduled to be released in 2010, Toy Story 3 has Lee Unkrich taking on the directorial responsibility for the highly anticipated sequel. “I remember when we were making A Bug’s Life, John Lasseter used to have his kids come in…and they were really little guys. And now one by one, he’s sending [them] off to college. So, a lot of that is informing, just emotionally, what we’re doing in Toy Story 3.” As for why Pixar is producing a third picture with the characters of Woody and Buzz Lightyear, Unkrich answered, “We were only making this now because we thought we had stumbled upon a good story to tell, and we wanted it to be as emotionally rich as possible. So when we arrived at the notion of having Andy grown up and about to head off to college that seemed like the perfect life event [in which] to place our story.”
The toys of the college bound Andy are accidentally thrown away; they find themselves being the playthings of careless pre-school children. Woody (Tom Hanks) attempts to rescue his friends from the local day-care centre only to have Buzz (Tim Allen) damaged in the escape attempt. “We’ve been working with these characters for so long in our lives, for the last 15 years, we feel like we know them,” replied Lee Unkrich. “And it’s really fun to take them and put them in a situation where we don’t necessarily know how they’re going to react.” Along with the new situations are new cast members. “All of the main characters are back and we’ve added into that mix quite a few new characters. We actually have more characters in Toy Story 3 than in any film that we’ve made at Pixar.” Unkrich was tight-lipped about identifying the new toys with the exception of one – the Ken doll to be voiced by an actor who played Chick Hicks in Cars. “Michael Keaton [The Paper] came to us very early on, when we started to think about who would be the perfect voice of Ken. We were really thrilled that he was on board with the idea of doing it.”
Toy Story 3 is not the only picture on the production slate for Pixar. In 2011, the animation studio will be producing its first fairy tale The Bear and the Bow, and the sequel Cars 2: World Grand Prix. Accompanying the two pictures into movie theatres will be newt, a story about the last two members of a species who are forced to mate in a laboratory. Writer and director Gary Rydstrom surmises, “newt is smart but he’s never had to think for himself and [he] is pampered. Brooke on the other hand is streetwise and not to be messed with. It’s fair to say it’s about as bad as first dates can get.”
Tentatively set for release in 2012 is Monsters, Inc. 2. In the same year, Andrew Stanton will break new ground as he is being “loaned” to Disney to produce a live-action animation version of John Carter of Mars written by Edgar Rice Burroughs. The series of eleven fantasy novels details the adventures of an American Civil War veteran who finds himself mysteriously stranded on the red planet. Stanton has no worries about making the transition from directing animation. “It’s exactly like being a live-action director; it’s just that all the tools everybody uses to do their jobs are computers.” Not to be outdone, Brad Bird is directing a live-action disaster picture being partly financed by Pixar; 1906 (2012), which is based on the novel by James Dalessandro, describes the events prior and during the devastating San Francisco earthquake that occurred at the turn of the twentieth century.
Edwin Catmull does not believe that Pixar will become just another major movie studio motivated by the balance sheet. “In the corporations there is certainly the mentality of playing the numbers. If you put out 20 films, you hope that a number are successful. It’s like human reproduction versus frog reproduction. Frogs produce thousands and hope a few succeed. Humans don’t produce many babies but put a lot of energy into them; which is kind of where we are. They still don’t always succeed but you try a lot harder.”
The emphasis on producing quality rather than quantity is paying off. Five of the Pixar directors: Brad Bird (The Incredibles, Ratatouille), John Lasseter (Toy Story, Toy Story 2, Cars), Peter Docter (Monsters, Inc., Up), Andrew Stanton (Finding Nemo, WALL-E), and Lee Unkrich (Toy Story 3), on the behalf of the animation studio, accepted a lifetime achievement award at the 2009 Venice Film Festival.
Describing the attitude Pixar takes when developing a project, Andrew Stanton said, “We’re not trying to second-guess what the demographics are, or trying to second-guess who our audience is. We’re going to make a movie we want to see.”
If the past is any indication of the future, one would have to conclude that film lovers around the world will continue to be a receptive audience.
Be sure to vote in our Pixar Poll, and you can also check out our review of Pixar's latest, Up.
Watch the trailer for Toy Story 3, or read the scripts for Ratatouille and WALL-E.
Find out more at Pixar's official site, or visit Pixar Planet and Pixar Talk for news and discussion. Animated Views also provide animation news, reviews and commentary.
Thanks to David Price, author of The Pixar Touch: The Making of a Company, available at Amazon.com.
Trevor Hogg is a freelance video editor and writer who currently resides in Canada.
Fostering a creative rapport between co-workers is something that Pixar goes out of its way to achieve. “We work hard on culture here,” explained the animation studio’s co-founder and president Edwin Catmull. “When you go into other studios, you’ll find that most are either artistically driven or technically driven. We’ve tried hard to make sure that our technical people and creative people are peers. We’ve found that when the technology is strong, it inspires the artists. And when the artists are strong, they challenge the technology. The result is that our artists and technical people appreciate each other talents.” One of the ways the animation studio sets about establishing a sense of camaraderie is through education. “Another thing we do when people [artists and technicians] come on board is send them to Pixar University,” revealed Catmull. “This is a ten-week classroom program to teach people how to use our tools and to cross-train them. So we’ve got classes in filmmaking, sculpting, drawing, painting, and improvisation.” The benefits of the unique initiative have proven to be indispensable. “One of the effects Pixar University has on the culture is that it makes people less self-conscious about their work and gets them comfortable with being publicly reviewed.”
Breaking from his normal routine of promoting internal candidates, the Pixar’s co-founder and creative wizard John Lasseter decided to hand over the directorial reins of the next project to his former CalArts classmate Brad Bird. Recalling the animator who was responsible for the critically praised The Iron Giant (1999), Lasseter stated, “Brad would hang out all night taking about Scorsese [Raging Bull] and Coppola [The Conversation] and how he could do what they do with animation.” Pursuing his career ambition of moving beyond the children fairy tales and producing stories with a more adult sensibility had not been an easy one for Brad Bird. “I kept having these movies get on the runway, then they would never get cleared for takeoff,” recalled Bird. “My guy would get fired. Then, of course, the new guy wouldn’t want to deal with something the old guy had done. Or a film that was vaguely like something I was working on would tank at the box office.” The frustration caused the independent-minded animator to seek out an organization known for developing and producing its own pictures. “I think the thing that made me want to come to Pixar was not the technology, but the fact that they protect their stories. They want original stories and they allow you to develop them without focus grouping stuff to death, or making you take out everything that is interesting. It’s a little pocket of sanity in a crazy business.”
Whereas previous Pixar films had made use of multiple contributors, Brad Bird adopted a singular approach to his scriptwriting and directing for The Incredibles (2004). Creating a movie about a family of superheroes was a risky proposition for the company. “It is a totally different challenge,” remarked Edwin Catmull. “The humans in our previous films were not the strongest element.” Rather than recreating the minute details of human skin such as pores and hair follicles, the decision was made to render the main characters in a stylized cartoon manner. “The hardest thing about The Incredibles was that there was no hardest thing,” declared supervising technical director Rick Sayre. “Brad ordered a heaping helping of everything on the menu. We’ve got it all: fire, water, air, smoke, steam, explosions, and by the way humans…Getting hair to work at all and to move, and clothing, and then doing for it for a big ensemble cast. It’s a Pixar compendium.”
Brad Bird devised a tale about a superhero in the witness protection plan who attempts to recapture his glory days, only to find himself in need of being saved by his wife and his children. “The dad is always expected in the family to be strong, so I made him strong,” explained Bird. “The moms are always pulled in a million different directions, so I made her stretch like taffy. Teenagers, particularly teenage girls, are insecure and defensive, so I made her turn invisible and turn on shields. And ten-year-old boys are hyperactive energy balls. Babies are unrealized potential.”
Following the tradition of Pixar employees providing some of voices for the animated characters, Brad Bird made a memorable appearance as the pint-sized fashion designer with a Herculaneum ego, Edna Mode. Comparisons with Watchmen, a graphic novel by Alan Moore, which also featured exiled superheroes who were hunted down and killed, caused Bird to respond that the similarities were coincidental since he had never read the book.
Aided by the voice talent of Craig T. Nelson (The Killing Fields), Holly Hunter (Broadcast News), Samuel L. Jackson (The Negotiator), Elizabeth Peña (Lone Star), and Jason Lee (Almost Famous), the picture grossed $261 million domestically and $631 million worldwide. At the Academy Awards, The Incredibles won for Best Animated Feature and Best Sound Editing, and received a nomination for Best Original Screenplay.
One Man Band (2005), a short film about a street performer named Bass who competes with a rival for a large gold coin, features no dialogue, only music; it received an Oscar nomination for Best Animated Short.
Buoyed by Pixar’s growing reputation for producing quality and commercially successful films, Steve Jobs was determined to obtain autonomy for the animation studio. “The truth is that there has been little creative collaboration with Disney for years,” declared Jobs. “Not even Disney’s marketing and brand could turn Disney’s last two animated films, Treasure Planet [2002] and Brother Bear [2003], into successes.” The threat of an impending divorce sparked Disney shareholders to revolt which led to the ousting of Michael Eisner as CEO. The departure of Eisner set the groundwork for a momentous deal which occurred on January 26, 2006. A stock swap between the two companies saw Disney agree to acquire Pixar for the amount of $7.4 billion. Edwin Catmull was installed as the president of the new animation organization while his colleague John Lasseter was rewarded with the position of Chief Creative Officer.
Taking inspiration from a cross-country road trip with his wife and five children, John Lasseter went about developing the next project for Pixar. In Cars (2006), a hotshot racecar gets lost in a rundown town called Radiator Springs on its way to a major competition at the Los Angeles International Speedway. Featured in the cast of characters are actual racecar drivers Paul Newman (The Sting), and Richard Petty. The protagonist Lightning McQueen (Owen Wilson) was named in honour of supervising animator Glenn McQueen who had died in 2002.
To create Radiator Springs some research was conducted by the likes of production designer Bob Pauley. “Typically, we’d go into a town and we’d hear all these wonderful stories from the locals. We’d soak it all in while getting a haircut at the barbershop, or enjoying a snow cone, or taking the challenge to eat a 72-ounce steak at the Big Texan.”
When designing the various vehicles, Pauley was given very specific instructions. “From the beginning of this project, John Lasseter had it in his mind to have the eyes be in the windshield. For one thing, it separates the characters from the more common approach where you have little cartoon eyes in the headlights. For another, he thought that having eyes down near the mouth at the front end of the car feels more like a snake. With the eyes set in the windshield, the point-of-view is more human-like, and made it feel like the whole car could be involved with the animation of the character.”
Cars received a mixed reception from the film critics. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer wrote that the picture was “one of Pixar’s most imaginative and thoroughly appealing movies ever”; while Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times declared, “The movie is great to look at and a lot of fun but somehow lacks the extra push of other Pixar films.” Even with accusations that the imagery had hijacked the story, Cars accumulated $244 million in domestic box office receipts and $462 million worldwide. At the Academy Awards, the picture received Oscar nominations for Best Animated Feature and Best Original Song.
The short film Lifted (2007) was written and directed by seven-time Oscar winner Gary Rydstrom (Saving Private Ryan). To pass his examination, a young alien must abduct a sleeping farmer. Incorporating his experience as a sound editor and mixer, Rydstrom based the spacecraft’s control panel on a sound mixer’s console. The five-minute-long story received a nomination for Best Animated Short.
A problematic script about a rat named Remy who desires to become a French chef led to the story’s originator Jan Pinkava being replaced by Brad Bird. “When the heads of Pixar [Lasseter, Jobs, Catmull] came to me and said, ‘We’re in trouble here. The curtain is ready to go up on production of Ratatouille [2007] and we’ve got to get this story solved,’” recalled the movie’s director and co-writer. “I dropped what I was planning to do and jumped in to help out because I have a huge respect for those guys, and this really amazing company they’ve created.’
Bird found himself drawn to the main character. “I think we all have impossible dreams and we do what we can to pursue them – and Remy’s dream might be the ultimate impossible dream of them all.” Though enamored with the theme of the movie, the director diverged significantly from the initial concept. “The emotional core of the original story was not to [Bird’s] liking,” explained Pinkava, who subsequently left Pixar. “The character of Remy changed profoundly. He became more self-assured and straight-forward, confidently following his talent and passion for cooking, and working to overcome the obstacles to his dream. Left behind were the complexities of character: Remy’s own struggle with his identity as a rat, his betrayal of his family’s values, his awareness of the craziness of his desire to be part of an enemy world, his yearning for acceptance and frustration with living a lie in a kitchen, all culminating to his final ‘coming out’.”
When asked on how he would portray a city which has been the setting for countless films, Brad Bird answered, “Paris has been seen [in] many different ways, but never from a rat’s point-of-view.” He went on to add, “If we’re going to capture Paris, we aren’t trying to perfectly reproduce the actual Paris; we’re trying to reproduce the feeling of being in Paris.” As for the overall tone of the picture, Bird replied, “We were after a lush-looking film that was kind of sensuous, which is not what you connect with animation usually.”
Among the voice talents staring in the movie were actors Patton Oswalt (Magnolia), Lou Romano (Monkeybone), Ian Holm (Chariots of Fire), Peter O’Toole (Venus), Brian Dennehy (Presumed Innocent), and Janeane Garofalo (Cop Land). At the North American box office, Ratatouille grossed $206 million, while globally it made $624 million; the picture was awarded the Oscar for Best Animated Feature and received an Academy Awards nomination for Best Original Screenplay.
Maintaining its interest in producing short films, Pixar released Presto in 2008. Originally meant to be about a rabbit who suffers from stage fright, the tale was reworked to make the fury creature an uncooperative participant in a magic show. The five-minute-long story received an Oscar nomination for Best Animated Short.
“There was this lunch we had during Toy Story around ’94 and we were batting around just any idea we could think of to try and come up with what the next move would be,” explained Andrew Stanton, Pixar’s executive producer and chief screenwriter. “One of the sort of half-brained sentences was ‘Hey, we could do sci-fi. What if we did the last robot on Earth?.’” At the time, the concept was dismissed for being too arty because of the lack of dialogue. Stanton never abandoned his luncheon suggestion and in 2005 development started on what would become known as WALL-E (2008). Left alone on a garbage-strewn Earth, a waste disposal machine has an extraterrestrial encounter with a visiting female robot. Smitten, the title character hides onboard a luxury spaceship that takes his true love away.
“I’m not one of those people who comes up with a theme and then writes to it,” stated Stanton, the creator of the ninth picture for Pixar. “I like to go with natural things that seem to be firing, and then somewhere halfway I realize what the theme is. I realized that [what] I was pushing with these two programmed robots was their desire to try and figure out what the point of living was, and it took these really irrational acts of love for them to discover how they were built. And I said, ‘That’s it. That’s my theme. Irrational love defeats life’s programming.’”
Providing the otherworldly ambience for the movie was sound designer guru Ben Burtt, who gained international acclaim for his work on the Star Wars franchise. For a more nostalgic feel, Stanton added the classic song Hello, Dolly! to the opening sequence. “I always loved the idea of putting an old-fashioned song against space. I always loved the idea of the future against the past juxtaposed, and I just thought that was a great intro into the movie.”
When Andrew Stanton set about crafting the script, he was influenced by the unconventional format adopted by screenwriter Dan O’Bannon for Alien (1979). “He [O’Bannon] would do little four-to-eight-word descriptions and then sort of left-justify it and make it four lines each, little blocks, so it almost looked like haikus. It would create this rhythm in the readers where you would appreciate these silent visual moments as much as you would the dialogue on the page.” Stanton also referenced films made by Charlie Chaplin (The Great Dictator), Buster Keaton (The General), and Harold Lloyd (The Freshman) to aid in the cinematic storytelling.
The lack of dialogue did not diminish the box office reception for WALL-E; the picture earned $224 million domestically and $521 million worldwide. At the Academy Awards, the movie was honoured with the Oscar for Best Animated Feature and a nomination for Best Original Screenplay. However, not only the film was lauded at the prestigious Hollywood event; Edwin Catmull received the Gordon E. Sawyer Award, “for his lifetime of technical contributions and leadership in the field of computer graphics for the motion picture industry.”
Peter Docter relied on a simple human emotion when devising the tenth, but first 3-D feature to be produced by Pixar. “There are plenty of days when you hate humanity, you’re so sick to death of everybody and you want to get away – and at the end, you realize...what really makes the world go ‘round is human connection.” Up (2009) stars an embittered widower, Carl Fredricksen (Ed Asner), who attaches a series of helium balloons to his home in an attempt to fulfill a dream that he and his late wife once shared – becoming explorers like the famous Charles F. Muntz (Christopher Plummer). A complication arises when Carl discovers that he is not alone on his journey to South America; an overeager Wilderness Explorer named Russell (Jordan Nagai) is stranded on the front porch of the airborne house.
“It was fun playing with this sort of misanthropic character,” stated Docter, “but then trying to ask yourself the question ‘How did he get that way?’ and ‘What’s leading him to do what he’s doing?’” To enable audiences to better understand Carl, the movie starts with an emotional dialogue-free sequence which details his life with his beloved Ellie. To create the potent montage, Docter and his head writer Bob Peterson culled the experiences from their own married lives. “It’s funny, because a lot of people point at that [a grumpy old man] and say ‘Hmm, I don’t know if that’s relatable,’ but we’ve rats as main characters. We’ve had big hairy beasts with horns as the main character. We’ve had some pretty wild stuff, and it really comes down to creating something where you see a little bit of yourself in those characters."
Interestingly, it was not the action scenes in the Amazon jungle which posed the biggest problem for Pete Docter. “There was one [sequence] called ‘Muntz’s Lair’, which is where Carl has dinner with [the] Charles Muntz character. We must have rewritten or re-storyboarded that thing at least 50 times from scratch.” He went on to say, “That was our chance to really, in a very short amount of time, to explain…his back story.”
When he composes a screenplay, Docter adopts an open mind. “You start with ideas that appeal to you, and then as you work back and forth through the film you always find ways to set them up and pay them off and hopefully do it in a subtle enough way that as an audience member you’re not aware of that.” Then there is the matter of the unexpected. “There’s always a big surprise, some curveball that the story throws at you. It seemed like you totally knew what you were doing, and now you have no idea. But that’s the fun of it. If we knew what we were doing, then I don’t think the movies would be as good.”
Setting the right tone proved to be quite a challenge for the production team. “It was tricky, especially, shift gears from where you go from the scene where Carl and Ellie have their life together and then you transition into more comedy stuff,” mused Peter Docter. “How to get from one to the other without stepping on the other is really tricky but that’s something I think we really needed.” Docter does not make use of a singular vision when developing his movies. “I talk more generally about ‘he’s really thirsty – he hasn’t had a drink in three days,’ and other information they need to know about the scene, and let the animator bring his own acting choices to it and really make the picture much more rich because of it.”
With growing box office receipts of $293 domestically and $507 million worldwide, Up is favoured to win Best Animated Feature at the next Academy Awards.
Attached to the theatrical release of Up is another potential Oscar candidate for Pixar, the short film Partly Cloudy (2009). A lonely grey cloud is given the responsibility of creating animals which turn out to be belligerent; they are passed to a stork who delivers them to earth.
Fourteen years after gracing the big screen, Toy Story (followed by its sequel Toy Story 2) was released in the 3-D format. “We’ve all been big fans of 3-D over the years,” remarked Lee Unkrich, the supervising editor who assembled both Toy Story movies. “And really, until digital projection came into its own, just in the past few years, there was really no way, economically, to exhibit 3-D very effectively, have it look very good, or have it be cost-effective. And now, because so many theatres have digital projection, for the first time, we really can do it. That’s why you’re seeing so much 3-D stuff out there.” There is also another reason for the Pixar double-bill. “We want to build excitement for [Toy Story] 3 coming out. A lot of our audience has never seen the films on-screen in theatres.”
Scheduled to be released in 2010, Toy Story 3 has Lee Unkrich taking on the directorial responsibility for the highly anticipated sequel. “I remember when we were making A Bug’s Life, John Lasseter used to have his kids come in…and they were really little guys. And now one by one, he’s sending [them] off to college. So, a lot of that is informing, just emotionally, what we’re doing in Toy Story 3.” As for why Pixar is producing a third picture with the characters of Woody and Buzz Lightyear, Unkrich answered, “We were only making this now because we thought we had stumbled upon a good story to tell, and we wanted it to be as emotionally rich as possible. So when we arrived at the notion of having Andy grown up and about to head off to college that seemed like the perfect life event [in which] to place our story.”
The toys of the college bound Andy are accidentally thrown away; they find themselves being the playthings of careless pre-school children. Woody (Tom Hanks) attempts to rescue his friends from the local day-care centre only to have Buzz (Tim Allen) damaged in the escape attempt. “We’ve been working with these characters for so long in our lives, for the last 15 years, we feel like we know them,” replied Lee Unkrich. “And it’s really fun to take them and put them in a situation where we don’t necessarily know how they’re going to react.” Along with the new situations are new cast members. “All of the main characters are back and we’ve added into that mix quite a few new characters. We actually have more characters in Toy Story 3 than in any film that we’ve made at Pixar.” Unkrich was tight-lipped about identifying the new toys with the exception of one – the Ken doll to be voiced by an actor who played Chick Hicks in Cars. “Michael Keaton [The Paper] came to us very early on, when we started to think about who would be the perfect voice of Ken. We were really thrilled that he was on board with the idea of doing it.”
Toy Story 3 is not the only picture on the production slate for Pixar. In 2011, the animation studio will be producing its first fairy tale The Bear and the Bow, and the sequel Cars 2: World Grand Prix. Accompanying the two pictures into movie theatres will be newt, a story about the last two members of a species who are forced to mate in a laboratory. Writer and director Gary Rydstrom surmises, “newt is smart but he’s never had to think for himself and [he] is pampered. Brooke on the other hand is streetwise and not to be messed with. It’s fair to say it’s about as bad as first dates can get.”
Tentatively set for release in 2012 is Monsters, Inc. 2. In the same year, Andrew Stanton will break new ground as he is being “loaned” to Disney to produce a live-action animation version of John Carter of Mars written by Edgar Rice Burroughs. The series of eleven fantasy novels details the adventures of an American Civil War veteran who finds himself mysteriously stranded on the red planet. Stanton has no worries about making the transition from directing animation. “It’s exactly like being a live-action director; it’s just that all the tools everybody uses to do their jobs are computers.” Not to be outdone, Brad Bird is directing a live-action disaster picture being partly financed by Pixar; 1906 (2012), which is based on the novel by James Dalessandro, describes the events prior and during the devastating San Francisco earthquake that occurred at the turn of the twentieth century.
Edwin Catmull does not believe that Pixar will become just another major movie studio motivated by the balance sheet. “In the corporations there is certainly the mentality of playing the numbers. If you put out 20 films, you hope that a number are successful. It’s like human reproduction versus frog reproduction. Frogs produce thousands and hope a few succeed. Humans don’t produce many babies but put a lot of energy into them; which is kind of where we are. They still don’t always succeed but you try a lot harder.”
The emphasis on producing quality rather than quantity is paying off. Five of the Pixar directors: Brad Bird (The Incredibles, Ratatouille), John Lasseter (Toy Story, Toy Story 2, Cars), Peter Docter (Monsters, Inc., Up), Andrew Stanton (Finding Nemo, WALL-E), and Lee Unkrich (Toy Story 3), on the behalf of the animation studio, accepted a lifetime achievement award at the 2009 Venice Film Festival.
Describing the attitude Pixar takes when developing a project, Andrew Stanton said, “We’re not trying to second-guess what the demographics are, or trying to second-guess who our audience is. We’re going to make a movie we want to see.”
If the past is any indication of the future, one would have to conclude that film lovers around the world will continue to be a receptive audience.
Be sure to vote in our Pixar Poll, and you can also check out our review of Pixar's latest, Up.
Watch the trailer for Toy Story 3, or read the scripts for Ratatouille and WALL-E.
Find out more at Pixar's official site, or visit Pixar Planet and Pixar Talk for news and discussion. Animated Views also provide animation news, reviews and commentary.
Thanks to David Price, author of The Pixar Touch: The Making of a Company, available at Amazon.com.
Trevor Hogg is a freelance video editor and writer who currently resides in Canada.
UK Box Office Top Ten - weekend commencing 13/11/09
UK box office top ten and analysis for the weekend of Friday 13th - Sunday 15th November 2009.
Storming its way to the top of the chart with one of the highest openings of the year is Roland Emmerich's latest world-destroying effort 2012, starring John Cusack. Banking almost £6.5m it surely helped to ease Emmerich's disappointment over the underwhelming 10,000BC, while just managing to top the debut haul of his previous disaster epic The Day After Tomorrow in the process.
Knocked from the top spot in its second weekend is Robert Zemeckis' motion-capture adaptation of Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol, although with an actual increase in box office (over 30%) and the festive season fast approaching the film could yet be in for a lengthy run in the chart. Meanwhile opening in third is this week's only new entry, the violent British thriller Harry Brown, which seen an impressive £1,271,814 in takings and pushed Pixar blockbuster Up out of the top three for the first time since its release six weeks ago.
Elsewhere in the chart, The Men Who Stare at Goats falls one place to fifth, while both Fantastic Mr. Fox and An Education remaining stationary in sixth and ninth respectively. It was however a bad week for Michael Jackson's This Is It (plummeting to seventh place while nudging towards the £10m mark), The Fourth Kind and Jennifer's Body (both of which fall three places), with all three looking about ready for the count.
Incoming...
On Wednesday British fantasy horror Temptation hits our screens, looking to get a head start on the vampire market before The Twilight Saga: New Moon storms to the top of the chart on Friday.
For those looking to avoid the bloodsucker genre Friday also sees the release of the Coen brothers' new black comedy A Serious Man, along with Steven Soderbergh's latest The Informant! (starring Matt Damon) and historical drama Glorious 39.
U.K. Box Office Archive
Storming its way to the top of the chart with one of the highest openings of the year is Roland Emmerich's latest world-destroying effort 2012, starring John Cusack. Banking almost £6.5m it surely helped to ease Emmerich's disappointment over the underwhelming 10,000BC, while just managing to top the debut haul of his previous disaster epic The Day After Tomorrow in the process.
Knocked from the top spot in its second weekend is Robert Zemeckis' motion-capture adaptation of Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol, although with an actual increase in box office (over 30%) and the festive season fast approaching the film could yet be in for a lengthy run in the chart. Meanwhile opening in third is this week's only new entry, the violent British thriller Harry Brown, which seen an impressive £1,271,814 in takings and pushed Pixar blockbuster Up out of the top three for the first time since its release six weeks ago.
Elsewhere in the chart, The Men Who Stare at Goats falls one place to fifth, while both Fantastic Mr. Fox and An Education remaining stationary in sixth and ninth respectively. It was however a bad week for Michael Jackson's This Is It (plummeting to seventh place while nudging towards the £10m mark), The Fourth Kind and Jennifer's Body (both of which fall three places), with all three looking about ready for the count.
Pos. | Film | Weekend Gross | Week | Total UK Gross |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2012 | £6,489,809 | 1 | £6,489,809 |
2 | A Christmas Carol | £2,507,053 | 2 | £5,469,764 |
3 | Harry Brown | £1,271,814 | 1 | £1,271,814 |
4 | Up | £985,722 | 6 | £32,754,463 |
5 | The Men Who Stare at Goats | £796,080 | 2 | £2,759,335 |
6 | Fantastic Mr Fox | £675,753 | 4 | £7,714,879 |
7 | Michael Jackson's This Is It | £475,437 | 3 | £9,301,428 |
8 | The Fourth Kind | £428,115 | 2 | £1,813,458 |
9 | An Education | £202,230 | 3 | £1,369,940 |
10 | Jennifer's Body | £181,554 | 2 | £1,196,718 |
Incoming...
On Wednesday British fantasy horror Temptation hits our screens, looking to get a head start on the vampire market before The Twilight Saga: New Moon storms to the top of the chart on Friday.
For those looking to avoid the bloodsucker genre Friday also sees the release of the Coen brothers' new black comedy A Serious Man, along with Steven Soderbergh's latest The Informant! (starring Matt Damon) and historical drama Glorious 39.
U.K. Box Office Archive
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)