On the matter of returning to the director’s chair, American filmmaker Walter Murch remarked, “I've thought about it and I tried for a number of years to get projects off the ground and just ran out of luck and went back to what I love, which is film editing.” Describing the criteria he uses to determine what will be his next assignment, Murch stated, “When I am considering a project, I read the script, take notes, type them up, and give them to the director. I would include both what I think is good about the script – what attracted me to it – and where I think there may be room for improvement.”

Venturing into the realm of documentaries, Walter Murch was the sound mixer for Seeing in the Dark (2007) based on a book by Timothy Ferris; the one hour film which was aired on PBS explores stargazing. In the same year the San Francisco International Film Festival premiered a documentary featuring the movie veteran talking about his profession in Murch: Murch on Editing. “In film, there’s a dance between the words and images and the sounds,” observed Murch. “As rich as films appear, they are limited by two of the five senses – hearing and sight – and they are limited in time – the film lasts only as long at it takes to project it. It’s not like a book. If you don’t understand a paragraph in a book, you can read it again, at your own pace. With a film, you have to consume at one go, at a set speed. But if a film can provoke the audience’s participation – if the film gives a certain amount of information but requires the audience to complete the ideas, then it engages each member of the audience as a creative participant in the work. How each moment gets completed depends on each person. So the film, although it’s materially the same series of images and sounds, should ideally provoke slightly different reactions from each person who sees it.”

Walter Murch’s involvement with the cinematic adaptation of the novella by Micrea Eliade about a seventy year old professor (Tim Roth) who discovers he is growing younger after being struck by lightning was delayed. “I was still working on Sam Mendes’ Jarhead so I didn't join the film until all the material was shot, although I did meet with Francis at a kind of midway point. He took a break from shooting in Romania and he came for Christmas to the States. We met to talk about the screenplay and he said, ‘Are there any other scenes we could shoot?’”. Responding to the question, Walter Murch suggested the insertion of the mirror scene that takes place near the end of the picture.
“It's about this person who is youth without youth,” explained Murch, “he's young, objectively in his early to late 30s or early 40s but he still has all the knowledge that he had when he was 70 years old. It examines the tension of that situation which really is the tension Francis finds himself in.” The re-recording mixer and film editor for the tale that unfolds in 1938 Romania added, “There are times when it's a reincarnation movie, a sort of a Mummy film, if you will. There are other times when it's like Frankenstein. There are other times when it's sort of a split personality movie like The Portrait of Dorian Gray [1945]. There are times when it's a Nazi movie and people are running through alleyways like in The Third Man [1949]. All of these come in some form from the original novella, but once they're visualized they have a weight and an impact that is different than the printed word. [The challenge was] to find ways to integrate and balance these, while still being respectful of the original novella and Francis's adaptation of it.”
“I hope it finds an audience that's congenial to it,” said Walter Murch. “I'm very happy it was made. It got Francis directing again after an absence of 10 years.” Murch is impressed by the ingenuity of his friend and colleague. “Francis has gotten himself into a place where, because of his success with his winery, he can afford, if the budget is low enough, to self-finance these films and get them off the ground.”

Travelling to Buenos Aires, Bennie (Alden Ehrenreich) searches for his long lost older brother Tetro (Vincent Gallo). “Ideally everything needed to make a Zoetrope film on location should be able to be loaded into two vans,” revealed Walter Murch. “The Buenos Aires building that was our base of operations reminded me of the Zoetrope building in San Francisco 40 years ago. The central idea was to break down the separation between tasks and to be as efficient and collaborative as possible. In other words, to operate more like a film-school crew. Zoetrope has always embraced new technology – the classic ‘early adopter’ profile. Our crew in Buenos Aires was full of young, enthusiastic local film technicians and artists; on a number of occasions, rounding a corner, I felt like I was bumping into a 40-year-younger version of myself.” The film was originally shot in colour. “The footage was already desaturated before I started cutting, so I was always looking at black-and-white material. However, a few times when I’d match-frame a shot, the color version of the source media would pop up and then that was quite a shock!” There was a certain perk attached to the production. “My cutting room also doubled as the screening room and, as we were using the Sim2 digital projector, I had the luxury of being able to cut and look at a 20-foot wide screen as I did so.”

In the remake of the 1941 classic horror picture, Benicio Del Toro (Traffic) plays a nobleman who is tragically bitten by the cursed beast. “I create my first assembly without reference to the sound,” confided Walter Murch. “I view everything with sound, and I take detailed notes about what the sound is like. But when I’m actually assembling a scene, I assemble it as a silent movie. Even if it’s a dialog scene, I lip read what people are saying. I then refine it as a silent movie, and when I feel that it’s telling itself as a series of images, then I’ll light up all the tracks, and see what all of my cuts have wrought.” Joe Johnston was impressed with the work of Murch whom he has known for two decades. “Walter did what became the final cut of the film. He shortened it by about twenty minutes and rearranged a lot of it. I don’t think he left any scene intact.”
There are certain cinematic truths which Walter Murch keeps in mind when assembling a picture. “If you were to think of the audience’s focus of attention as a dot moving around the screen, the editor’s job is to carry that dot around in an interesting way. If the dot is moving from left to right and then up to the right-hand corner of the frame, when there’s a cut, make sure there’s something to look at in the right-hand corner of the next shot to receive that focus of interest.” Crosscutting between storylines makes the movie viewing experience more dynamic. “Films with a single point-of-view are on borrowed time if they are more than two hours long. Since there’s only one point-of-view, there’s no relief if the audience is not one hundred percent with the film, and it can subsequently seem too long even if it isn’t objectively so.”
Outside of movies, Walter Murch is an avid beekeeper. “A film is a very rich distillation of a tremendous amount of work,” reflected the New York-native whose son Walter Jr. (Goya’s Ghost) has followed him into the edit suite. “I forget exactly what the ratio is for honey but the honey you put into your tea -- that teaspoon represents a gallon of nectar that had to be refined and brought down to size. So there is a similarity on that level.” Having worked with a number of renowned filmmakers over a career spanning four decades, the entertainment industry veteran observed, “If you crudely divided directors into two types, you could say there are result-oriented directors like the Coen Brothers [Fargo] or Guillermo [Pan’s Labyrinth] and there are process-oriented directors like Francis Coppola or Anthony Minghella who delight in making discoveries along the way; during shooting, opportunities will present themselves and they will seize those opportunities.”

While in the edit suite, Walter Murch adopts a certain cinematic point of view. “We hope to become better editors with experience! Yet you have to have an intuition about the craft to begin with; for me, it begins with, ‘Where is the audience looking? What are they thinking?’ As much as possible, you try to be the audience. At the point of transition from one shot to another, you have to be pretty sure where the audience’s eye is looking, where the focus of attention is. That will either make the cut work or not.” Murch carried on to say, “The key is just to follow your interests wherever they may lead - keep the audience in mind; don't abuse the audience unnecessarily - but also, follow your interests and then just keep going. Don't let anything stop you because then that would be the real crisis.”
For more on Walter Murch, be sure to visit FilmSound.org and NPR, while Michael Ondaatje's The Conversations: Walter Murch and the Art of Editing Film
You can also show your appreciation and discuss his body of work on the Walter Murch Facebook page.
Walter Murch lecture - part one and part two.
Trevor Hogg is a freelance video editor and writer who currently resides in Canada.
No comments:
Post a Comment