Sunday, May 30, 2010

Movies... For Free! Night Tide (1961)

Showcasing classic movies that have fallen out of copyright and are available freely from the public domain (with streaming video!)...

Night Tide Dennis Hopper
Night Tide, 1961.
Directed by Curtis Harrington.
Starring Dennis Hopper, Linda Lawson, Gavin Muir and Luana Anders.

A low budget offering from American International Pictures and writer-director Curtis Harrington, Night Tide stars Dennis Hopper as young sailor Johnny Drake. Enjoying his shore leave in Venice Beach, California, Johnny meets a mysterious 'mermaid' called Mora (Linda Lawson) at a marina carnival attraction. Sparking up a relationship, Johnny discovers that all of Mora's previous lovers have died in suspicious circumstances. Mora believes herself to be a descendent of the Sirens, seductresses from Greek mythology who lure sailors to their deaths, and is frequently visited by the sinister Madame Romanovitch (Marjorie Eaton), who calls out for Mora to fulfil her destiny. Will Johnny become the latest victim, or can Mora resist her temptation?

Premiering at the Venice International Film Festival in 1961, it would be a further two years before Night Tide saw general release via Roger Corman's Filmgroup as part of a double-bill with The Raven (1963). It also features Corman regular Luana Anders, who would appear in later Hopper works including The Trip (1967) and Easy Rider (1969), and was selected for preservation by the Academy Film Archive in 2007.


Embed courtesy of Internet Archive.

Click here to view all entries in our Movies... For Free! collection.

Saturday, May 29, 2010

R.I.P. Dennis Hopper (1936-2010)

Dennis HopperHollywood legend Dennis Hopper has died at his home in California earlier today from complications of prostate cancer, aged 74. Hopper - who had battled the illness for almost a year and had recently received a long-overdue star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame - enjoyed a career that spanned over half a century. He achieved critical success as an actor, filmmaker, photographer and artist, as well as cult status for his roles in classic films such as Easy Rider (1969), Apocalypse Now (1979) and Blue Velvet (1986).

Born in Dodge City, Kansas, Hopper made his screen debut in 1955 alongside James Dean in Rebel Without A Cause and featured in Dean's final film Giant the following year. After a host of supporting film and TV roles throughout the 60s Hopper enjoyed a career breakthrough as co-writer, director and star of Easy Rider, receiving the Prix de la premiere oeuvre (First Work Award) along with an Academy Award nomination for Best Original Screenplay with Peter Fonda and Terry Southern.

Although his next directorial effort The Last Movie (1971) won the Critic's Prize at the Venice Film Festival, the film's disappointing performance forced Hopper to step back from Hollywood and he spent much of the 70s appearing in low budget affairs while battling drug and alcohol addiction. During this period he starred in Francis Ford Coppolla's epic Vietnam War movie Apocalypse Now and returned to the director's chair for 1980's Out of the Blue.

Entering rehab in 1983, Hopper began his comeback that same year with acclaimed performances in Rumble Fish and The Osterman Weekend before his iconic turn as sadistic villain Frank Booth in David Lynch's Blue Velvet (1986) and a Best Supporting Actor nomination for Hoosiers helped to revitalise his fortunes. He would spend much of the remainder of his career in supporting roles in films such as True Romance (1993), along with villainous turns in a host of movies including Red Rock West (1992), Super Mario Bros. (1993), Speed (1994), Waterworld (1995) and Land of the Dead (2005).

Hopper's last feature appearance came in 2008 with Wim Wenders' Palermo Shooting, while his final performance - voice work for the upcoming computer animation Alpha and Omega - is set for release later this year.

Cult Classics: Easy Rider (1969)
Movies... For Free! Night Tide (1961)

Thoughts on... The National Movie Awards 2010

Vicki Isitt reports on the 2010 National Movie Awards...

The National Movie Awards, aired on ITV and hosted by James Nesbitt, proved just how much the British population loves Twilight, even more so than Harry Potter. While Twilight and Potter nearly equalled on awards it was clear from the audience where the preference lay. While the categories seemed promising enough, the nominees and winners showed just how fan crazy the British public are.

Action/Thriller (presented by Chris Rock)
SHERLOCK HOLMES

Family (presented by Orlando Bloom)
HARRY POTTER AND THE HALF-BLOOD PRINCE

Fantasy (presented by Chris North)
THE TWILIGHT SAGA: NEW MOON

Most Anticipated Movie of the Summer (presented by Aaron Johnson)
THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE

Breakthrough Movie (presented by Simon Pegg)
THE TIME TRAVELER'S WIFE

Performance of the Year (presented by Dominic Cooper and James Corden)
ROBERT PATTINSON

Special Recognition (presented by Kylie Minogue)
HARRY POTTER

Screen Icon (presented by Gwyneth Paltrow)
TOM CRUISE

Tom Cruise as Screen Icon I can understand, his career has spanned thirty years and included a massively wide variety of roles. But Robert Pattinson as performance of the year? Although I’m not much of a Twilight fan myself I can understand its popularity and why it’s successful, but I cannot bring myself to believe that Robert Pattinson gave the best performance from any film from this entire year, which unfortunately, is the downside in letting the public vote. The Time Traveler’s Wife isn’t so much a breakthrough movie but more of a blockbuster in my opinion so I’m not sure how that film fell into that category, in competition with Coco Before Chanel and other more independent films.

I wouldn’t have necessarily put Sherlock Holmes in the Action/Thriller section, but as Guy Richie said, they’ll “take it where they can get it”. Although slightly biased in my enjoyment of Harry Potter I still feel in agreement with the Potter series taking the Special Recognition award. To paraphrase David Yates, they employ roughly 2000 people, some for short periods of time, and some for ten years, they have given roles to nearly every major British actor and actress and help British cinema (with the help of American dollar financing) stay on the map. Not many other film series can boast such accomplishments.

The after party was nearly as disappointing as hearing Robert Pattinson win the Best Performance award, which consisted of a five minute appearance of Gwyneth Paltrow and odd sightings of James Nesbitt. A good enough awards show, improved slightly by the 3D preview clip of Toy Story 3, but perhaps a wider nominee selection and a bit less of the Twilight next year.

Vicki Isitt

Friday, May 28, 2010

Low Budget Horror Films - A Fair Criticism

Luke Owen with his thoughts on the low budget horror debut...

Some people have accused me in the past of having double standards. I have criticised films such as Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen for having a terrible story structure, dreadful dialogue and awful acting. Yet I can sit and watch Happy Birthday to Me, a film with terrible story structure, dreadful dialogue and awful acting, and quite enjoy it. So how come some films can get away with it?

Dead WoodA couple of months ago, I went to a Q and A session with British filmmakers David Bryant and Sebastian Smith for their low budget horror film Dead Wood. During the session, we were given a free copy of the DVD and a copy of the script to read through. A couple of nights later, I popped the film into my DVD player and then sat through one hour and twenty five minutes of terrible film.

The film slumps around at a frighteningly slow pace, the acting is GCSE drama class bad and the script may have well been written in crayon on a piece of pink paper with a flower border. Dead Wood is 100% grade A dreadful from start to finish and it was difficult to get through in one sitting.

But I can get behind this film and its filmmakers in full support in a cheerleaders outfit and a big banner expressing my love and support.

Why? Because these people are first time filmmakers and they did it all by themselves. These are a group of friends who got together to make a cheeky horror film for little to no budget and try and make a name for themselves. It was a long process and it was a hard process and it cost them more money than planned. Well, seven years later it finally paid off when they got a DVD distribution deal with Lionsgate Films. The sad fact is that the DVD didn’t sell all that well and they didn’t make any of their money back. But the most important part of the process was that they have learned from the mistakes they made and won’t make them next time round. The next film they make will be a lot better than Dead Wood.

Filmmaking is a learning process. You can’t be taught how to be a good at it and you can’t buy your way into being good at it. You can take all the courses in the world you want but you have to physically go out and do it if you ever want to improve. Nearly all first time filmmakers will make a terrible film. They may think it’s the dog’s bollocks when they make it but over time they’ll realise it’s just bollocks. I should know, I’ve been there and I’ve done it.

Backwoods BloodbathThis cropped into my mind last night while I was watching Backwoods Bloodbath, a low budget no frills horror film I picked up in ASDA for seven quid.

This has all the hallmarks of a true low budget horror affair. A group of teenagers go on a “get away” weekend to mourn the death of one of their friends. Whilst there, they encounter a local who tells them about “the horrors” that await them in the woods. The teens, predictably, ignore him and end up getting bumped off one by one in horrific ways.

The film gets off to a great start over the first hour (the first five minutes aside) and is really fun to watch. The characters are quite engaging and well thought out (if a little clichéd), the script is funny and not overly cheesy and the on-set make-up effects are outstanding. Some of the dialogue is interesting and well delivered and there are some genuinely excellent set pieces.

It’s not all positives unfortunately; the basic story premise is pretty weak and doesn’t sustain enough interest and debut camera operator Erin Castrapel frames some shots with such atrocious inaccuracy, which doesn’t help the film's already amateur look. The film also features some of the most unsexy sex scenes I’ve ever encountered. They looked really uncomfortable and were difficult to watch.

But it really falls off a cliff by the time the final act rolls in. The idea for it is actually pretty great and well thought out and how it plays out could have been a really strong ending to what had been quite an enjoyable film. But the acting gets so terrible, the direction disappears and the scene timing and progression are so badly executed that the film started to lose its appeal, which is a real shame.

This was never going to be a film that set the horror world on fire and it was never going to be hailed as a classic. But I’ve seen films in the same genre made for the same money that are much worse. It’s just frustrating that the film doesn’t deliver come the final 20 minutes.

But going back to my original point while discussing Dead Wood – this was their first film and I was not expecting miracles. What I got instead was a film with some great set pieces, some good comedy dialogue, some superb special effects and a terrible final half hour. This was a great first attempt at filmmaking and I’m sure Donn Kennedy and Brandon Semling will go onto make more films and will get better and better.

And I wish them the best of luck.

As always, thoughts and opinions to boddicker_scripts@yahoo.co.uk or visit my website www.boddicker-scripts.moonfruit.com

Luke Owen
“Why don’t you take a cue from my dick and go long” – Brent, Backwoods Bloodbath (2007)

Addendum: One final comment, this film won the New York Independent Film Festival award for Best Horror Feature. I can only imagine that no other films were nominated in that category.

R.I.P. Gary Coleman (1968-2010)

Former child star Gary Coleman has passed away aged 42. The actor - best known as pint-sized Arnold Jackson in the classic TV comedy series Diff'rent Strokes (1978 - 1986) - suffered a brain haemorrhage after fall at his home on Wednesday and died earlier today after his life support machine was turned off.

After making a number of TV appearances early in his childhood, the ten-year old Coleman was thrust into the spotlight with his turn as Arnold in Diff'rent Strokes, spawning the popular catchphrase "What'choo talkin' bout, Willis?" and quickly becoming the main star of the show. He struggled to shake off the character in later years, making sporadic television and film appearances in the likes of The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, The Simpsons and Dickie Roberts: Former Child Star, while his personal life was beset with legal problems.

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

For the Love of Trailers - The First Edition

Louise-Afzal Faerkel on What To Look Forward To... Or Not...

SECRETARIAT

Secretariat (2010) is the story of a woman (Diane Lane) who gets the chance to save her husband’s ranch from bankruptcy by training race horses. Great. Another one of those wannabe feminist flicks, where you know the main point is that woman can and should be allowed to work (did I mention this takes place in the 1950’s America?).

Well, not exactly. It certainly doesn’t want to be one of those, but does present itself that way. The trailer starts off very nicely, horses galloping away on the tracks. It feels magical, adventurous, soulful. Then we’re greeted with the actual plot.

We are expected to blindly root for poor Diane when her husband tells her : “[Horse training] needs a certain touch. And you’re a housewife”. Even though there is nothing to suggest that DL’s character actually has the know-how for the job. Perhaps I am cynical and misinterpreting the film, but it bothers me that the increasing number of women’s roles in Hollywood are about as profound and deep as a doorknob.

Then halfway through the trailer, John Malkovich enters like a breath of fresh air. He plays an eccentric and (literally) colourful horse trainer, hired to help DL in her endeavour. And he is by far the most interesting character.

All in all, the trailer doesn’t exactly sell the film to me. I yearn for creativity and original structure at the very least in the trailer. The sappy drama music by Nick Glennie-Smith works anything but wonders in this context. The dip to colour transitions are too easy and create drama in the least challenging way.

Brace yourselves for Seabiscuit II: The Son Returns.


JONAH HEX

Jonah Hex (2010) is based on a DC comic book character played Josh Brolin, a bounty hunter whose house and family get burned down by terrorist Turnbull (John Malkovich). Hex gets the chance to wipe the price tag off his own head by hunting down Turnbull for the US military.

Simple, short, sweet and with ample space for the actors to show off their straight-shooting, ass-kicking fighting skills. The trailer does a lot to sell the film. The grade is marvellous, the sound design sharp and the sets well accomplished. The powerful and awesome (read: handsome and well-paid) cast instantly capture your attention. But the whole experience is reversed once the voice over kicks in.

Granted, this man has a God-sent voice but Warner and Legendary would have been better off using someone with less bass, so I would actually pay attention to what he says, rather than focus on the heavy dubstep-like bassline ringing in my ears.

In addition to this, I am scared this may turn out to be another Daredevil (2003). All the signs are there: a high-paid well known cast, a plot few can relate to, and Megan Fox (= Colin Farrell = useless). I know what to expect, and that’s never good.

Also: I am not a huge comic book fan, nor am I completely ignorant of them, but I haven’t heard of Jonah Hex. I am not confident people will be attracted to the story (this is the age of remakes, sequels and popular adaptations after all).

All the best to them though, let’s see how it goes.


SUPER 8

Now, Super 8 (2010) is not a documentary about cameras or a film shot in the 1960’s or anything of the sort. It’s a film I don’t really want to write about. Not because it’s bad, namely because it looks absolutely amazing: I don’t want to spoil it for you.

Think about it: it’s a collaboration between Steven Spielberg and JJ Abrams. Ergo, it’s going to be incredible. I won’t reveal the plot – to be fair, the trailer doesn’t reveal a whole lot so I can’t (it’s about aliens coming to Earth, that’s safe to say!). This movie, at least the trailer, is visually stunning. The sound is astounding. Everything looks perfect.

The trailer itself is subtle, a little unoriginal in its layout of the premise; the graphics are tremendous and chilling. The mood it generates made me creep out of my own skin and elevate to a near-out-of-body experience. I actually forgot where I was while I was watching it (at work). It’s undoubtedly efficient and spell-binding.

The trailer reveals almost nothing about any aspect of the movie and yet manages to build up my expectations for it. I hope it doesn’t disappoint.

Watch the trailer. Now.


THE SCIENTIST

The first time I saw the trailer, two words came to mind: unnecessarily pretentious. Dr Marcus Ryan (Bill Sage) explains how he believes humans never really die. His voice rolls over shots of various technical gear and photos of the main character’s (presumably) dead family: he wants to bring back his family by constructing an energy generator. The machinery affects Dr Ryan and his surroundings and takes him to another level of consciousness.

The plot might be intriguing, but the trailer shows it off as yet another The Machinist (2004) or The Fountain (2006). I.e. hollow, ostentatious and far from popular. Personally I loved both films, but I know why people tend to dislike them: directors’ personal projects rarely sit well with anyone but their hardcore fans.

The second viewing surprised me though. It looks like this movie actually has potential. It could go very well or very wrong. It has a very intriguing plot, however the presentation of the trailer (“I’m-gonna-show-random-clips-from-the-film-with-a-pseudo-philosophical-voice-over-by-the-lead-and-thus-not-really-tell-you-what-it’s-about”) is poor and mocking to the public. It would have hit a total homerun had it instead of being condescending, exposed the plot in the way thrillers are: high-pace, fast editing, intense soundtrack. All these elements would have made the story more appealing to the viewers.

But it’s still shot beautifully, it uses a barely known cast which is pleasant and the more I think about it, the more enticed I get.


Louise-Afzal Faerkel

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Drawn to Anime: A Hayao Miyazaki Profile (Part 1)

Trevor Hogg profiles the career of Japanese animated filmmaker Hayao Miyazaki in the first of a five part feature...

Hayao Miyazaki“I was an overly self-conscious boy and I had a hard time holding my own in fights with others,” recalled renowned Japanese filmmaker Hayao Miyazaki, “but my classmates eventually accepted me because I was good at drawing.” Remembering a profound moment he experienced as a teenager, Miyazaki stated, “I first fell in love with animation when I saw Hakujaden [The Tale of the White Serpent], the animated feature produced by Toei Animation in 1958. I can still remember the pangs of emotion I felt at the sight of the incredibly beautiful young, female character, Bai-Niang, and how I went to see the film over and over as a result. It was like being in love, and Bai-Niang became a surrogate girlfriend for me at a time when I had none.” His repeat viewings of “Japan’s first true full-length colour animated feature” served as a career motivator for the anime artist who felt he could do better. “Eventually, I came to believe the film was a sham. There is too great a focus on the tragic connection between the young male protagonist, Shûsen, and the beautiful white girl, Bai Niang. As a result the other characters aren’t depicted in a very attractive light all.” The flaws in the movie allowed the Tokyo-native to discover his guiding principle. “I have had one constant theme in my work: ‘To watch good animation, and then to make something that surpasses it.’”

After graduating in political science and economics from Gakushuin University, Hayao Miyazaki turned his love for drawing into a career opportunity. “I started working as a new animator for Toei Animation in 1963,” remarked the moviemaker, “but I frankly didn’t enjoy the job at all. I felt ill at ease every day – I couldn’t understand the works we were producing, or even the proposals we were working on.” The growing frustration led Miyazaki to question his chosen profession. “Had I not one day seen Snedronningen (The Snow Queen, 1970) during a film screening hosted by the company’s labour union, I honestly doubt that I would have continued working as an animator.”

In explaining what made the Danish animated TV adaptation of the Han Christian Anderson fairy tale so special to him, Hayao Miyazaki said, “Snedronningen is proof of how much love can be invested in the act of making drawings move, and how much the movement of the drawings can be sublimated into the process of acting. It proves that when it comes to depicting simply yet strong, powerful, piercing emotions in an earnest and pure fashion, animation can fully hold its own with the best of what other media genres can offer, moving us powerfully.” Even though Miyazaki acknowledges that Hakujaden and Snedronningen “are hardly highbrow works”, he believes that both pictures serve a useful purpose. “What’s important here is not whether the film has some sort of permanent artistic value. The viewers – I include myself here – usually only possess a limited ability to comprehend a film and tend to overlook many important clues in it. But they feel liberated from their daily frustrations and their feelings of being overwhelmed.”

Hayao Miyazaki Little Norse Prince ValiantLooking back on his apprenticeship under veteran animator Yasuji Mori, Hayao Miyazaki admitted to being a “confrontational, impudent, and insolent” student. One of the significant projects Miyazaki worked on as member of the production staff was the feature directorial debut of his future long-time collaborator Isao Takahata called Taiyo no oji: Horusu no duiboken [Little Norse Prince Valiant, 1968]. Hols, a young Scandinavian boy, recovers the Sword of the Sun which he uses to defend a village from the ice demon Grundewald and the evil spirit’s beautiful sister Hilda.

“Paku-san [Takahata] really proved that animation has the power to depict the inner mind of humans in depth,” recalled Miyazaki who experienced a second creative revelation when he watched the picture. “Amid the turmoil of finalizing the film, I had no idea what kind of work Mori-san had been doing. Tears streamed from my eyes. It was not because the three-year project was over. It was because I couldn’t stop crying over the figure of Hilda that Mori-san had drawn. I had thought I had put all my efforts into the film project, but I realized then that my work had simply been to create a container. It was Mori-san who had put a soul into it.” Hayao Miyazaki believes in the ability of animated pictures to be cathartic. “Take an evil character such as Hilda in Little Norse Prince Valiant. She has a change of heart of heart and at the end she’s done in by the Snow Wolves. If that change of heart hadn’t happen, I can’t imagine anyone ever forgiving her. A purifying effect comes into play when an evil character transforms into a truly happy person, or when some really awful person turns good.” The internationally renowned animator philosophically observed, “I think our life force is the only thing we have that keeps us going. Hols was able to escape from the labyrinth of the forest because he himself had the energy to do so; he had an intense desire to live.”

Hayao Miyazaki Lupin IIILeaving Toei Animation in 1970, Isao Takahata and Hayao Miyazaki failed to convince writer Astrid Lindgren to sell them the film rights to her Pippi Longstocking books; as a result, the first major project for the duo was to co-direct the television series Rupan sansei (Lupin the Third, 1971) based on the manga (Japanese comic) by Monkey Punch. “[Arsène] Lupin was conceived as a character who inherited a fabulous fortune from his grandfather,” stated Miyazaki, “who lived in a mansion, who didn’t participate in society’s materialistic rat race, and who – to ward off boredom [or ennui, as we call it] – occasionally worked as a thief.” Reflecting on the show, Miyazaki remarked, “Lupin the Third was a new type of TV program and ahead of its time; it received a record number of orders from the broadcast industry, and its main sales point – its positivism – revealed a real desire to exploit the new information flooding into society before the others could. There was therefore a lot of attention paid to the details of the show – to things like Lupin’s Mercedes Benz SSK, to his expensive wristwatches and famous brand-name cigarette lighters, to the Walther P38 pistol or Combat Magnum revolver he always carried.”

“The desire to get the jump on trends was incorporated into the design of Lupin’s character,” revealed Hayao Miyazaki. “The old Lupin TV series flamed out after two cours [A cour is equivalent to a thirteen episode season; twenty-three episodes were made in total.] but there was a big change between Lupin’s character in the first third and the last two-thirds of the series.” The time of political activism was over in Japan. “Apathy itself became a trend of the new era,” reflected Miyazaki. “It was even incorporated into the film-directing styles, resulting for example, in the unique pose that Lupin and his sidekick Jigen often assumed of lazily flopping down to have a conversation. Unlike traditional heroes who would grin and bear whatever hardships they faced, Lupin took full advantage of a bountiful consumer society and was truly a creature of his era.”

“I’m not sure where the request came from, but we were compelled from somewhere in the organization to make changes in the direction of the old Lupin series", recalled Hayao Miyazaki. “We [Takahata and I] were in a fix, having taken over direction in midstream, and wanting more than anything else to get rid of this sense of apathy that infused the story.” Describing how the star of the TV program was reinvented, Miyazaki remarked, “The Lupin character who rode in a Benz SSK and the Lupin character who rode in a Fiat 500 [the car of poorer Italians] were like opposites in the series; they competed with each other, influenced each other, and as a result helped to enliven the series.” Not everything went smoothly with the new approach. “The change in direction during the broadcasts of the first series created confusion on the production side and, combined with the fact that TV animation techniques also stagnated around the same time, resulted in the visuals lacking unity. The quality of the show suffered. But this is just further evidence that the show’s after-the-fact popularity probably stemmed from the duality in Lupin’s persona.” Looking back on the television series which was revived in 1977 with Rupan sansei: Part II, the animator said, “The ‘new Lupin’ continued running for three years; at times it had quite high ratings, and may have even been commercially successful. But it never really functioned as a true creature of its era.”

Hayao Miyazaki Panda Go PandaAsked by Tokyo Movie Shinsha to create a short film starring a panda, Isao Takahata and Hayao Miyazaki came up with the idea for Panda Kopanda (Panda! Go, Panda!, 1972). “This work brings back memories,” fondly recalled Miyazaki. “It’s the rare work that gave me a warm feeling while I wrote it, while I animated it, and while I watched it. We wrote the proposal in one night and heard nothing about it for a few months after submitting it. When I heard on the radio news that pandas were arriving from China, I was sure it would be approved. Just as I thought, the project was immediately set to go. In that respect this work rode the wave of the panda boom.”

Mimiko, a seven-year-old girl who is left alone while her grandmother goes on a trip, discovers she has a surprise visitor – a baby panda. To devise the setting for the picture Hayao Miyazaki did not have to look far. “The landscape of the cherry tree-lined streets, the garden where cosmos flowers bloom, and the quiet suburb where cars rarely pass by are from the Kandagawa of my childhood, a town by the river that was later sung about as a polluted waterway.” The animator was quick to point out that, “The world depicted in Panda! Go, Panda! is not a product of nostalgia for those of us who worked on it. The work is an effort to depict, at least in animated film, Japan as it might have become.”

“When the film was released,” remembered Miyazaki, “I went to the movie theatre with my son and niece. It was shown with a Godzilla movie and it wasn’t very long. But the children who came to watch it enjoyed it immensely. At the end they sang along with the theme song. I was thrilled. I recall feeling very happy at the sight of those children. And I think it was because of the support of those children that I decided on the kind of work I’d do from then on.” The success of the short film resulted in the companion piece Panda Kopanda: Amerfuri circus no maki (Panda! Go, Panda! Rainy-Day Circus, 1973) being made. “For the sequel we decided from the start that I would write the scenario. Lounging around Takahata’s house, he and I chatted about what kind of story it should be and discovered that we shared a childhood attraction to floods.”

Hayao Miyazaki Heidi A Girl of the Alps“Our team created our first television series, called Arupusu no Shôjo Haiji [Heidi, a Girl of the Alps,1974],” remarked Hayao Miyazaki of the program which aired as part of Nippon Animation’s World Masterpiece Theatre. “We were ambitious. We wanted to create a work for children that wasn’t frivolous, and we wanted to break away from the compromised and slapdash television-animation shows of that time.” The story of Heidi who has numerous adventures while living with her grandfather in the Alps is based on the popular nineteenth century books by Swiss author Johanna Spyri. “There was an abnormal tension in the air. Junzô Nakajima, the producer, fully supported us. Once the broadcast started, we heard nothing about the sponsors’ opinions. That was a big help.” The TV show garnered so much critical acclaim that some of the fifty-two episodes were edited together to create a feature film. “It was a major hit. I would say it created an era. It was the first of a series of animation shows based on literary works. I think this was Paku-san’s [Isao Takahata] achievement.”

“I think we used up our idea of depicting ordinary life with Heidi,” confessed Miyasaki. “Paku-san agrees on this so does Kotabe-san [Yôichi Kotabe]. When Heidi ended we told each other, ‘Let’s make something carefree next,’ and ‘Lets not get involved in how the dishes were or what kind of table manners were correct.’ But our direction was set, with the next project being Furandāsu no Inu [The Dog of Flanders,1975]. This also was a ratings success, but I think of it as trash. Then came along Haha o Tazunete Sanren-ri [From the Apennines to the Andes, 1976]. We were all out of themes. That made us depict the customs of other countries like Italy or Argentina, and the atmosphere of upheaval and belated industrial revolution.”

Next on the agenda for Hayao Miyasaki was his debut directorial work which would be the first animated series to be aired by Japan’s national public broadcaster NHK.

Part Two

Starting Point 1979 to 1996 - a collection of essays and sketches by Hayao Miyazaki.

For more, visit
Studio Ghibli fansites Online Ghibli, StudioGhibli.net and GhibliWorld.com, along with the GhibliWiki.

Trevor Hogg is a freelance video editor and writer who currently resides in Canada.

Thoughts on... Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call - New Orleans (2009)

Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call - New Orleans, 2009.

Directed by Werner Herzog.
Starring Nicholas Cage, Eva Mendes and Val Kilmer.

Bad Lieutenant Port of Call New Orleans
SYNOPSIS:

After suffering a spinal injury in the line of work, newly-promoted Lieutenant Terence McDonagh (Nicholas Cage) spirals into drug abuse and corruption.

Bad Lieutenant Port of Call New Orleans
There’s a piece of modern movie-industry jargon that I cringe whenever I hear it - the 're-imagining'. It’s a word used as an excuse for butchering a cinematic classic due to a lack of original ideas, used thus "It's not a remake, it's a re-imagining.". For years now filmmakers have been plundering the vaults for films they can rehash into new releases for an arguably new audience. The eighties as a cinematic decade has suffered mostly from this plague, with scores of classics being picked up and re-imagined. They are some exceptions, but as I’m sure you’re aware, generally speaking the remake is inferior to the original product, particularly in the horror genre (see Michael Bay's horror-centric production company Platinum Dunes).

So its certainly a surprise when a director of Werner Herzog's calibre should helm a remake, but Bad Lieutenant is actually deserving of such a label as 're-imagining' rather than ‘remake’ because truthfully, with the exception of basic plot (corrupt cop spirals into drug addiction) this film doesn’t really bare that many similarities to the original.

Abel Ferrara's Bad Lieutenant (1992), starring a superbly tortured Harvey Keitel as the eponymous character, is a harrowing study in anguish and human despair. Keital plays a character utterly submerged in drug addiction and corruption who starts to experience catholic guilt while investigating the rape of a nun. Brutal, bleak and superb, the film studies the frequent Ferrara motif of addiction with real pain and visceral vulnerability, channelled through a devastating performance by Keitel.

Herzog's update relocates the film to New Orleans, post-devastation by Hurricane Katrina. The dirty, cramped and waterlogged streets provide an interesting contrast with the filthy New York streets of the original, also allowing Herzog to make use of surely the films most difficult to decipher element, the unusual reptile presence of watersnakes, alligators and most bizarre of all, iguanas. We get extreme close ups shot on digital ‘skaky-cam’ of both the alligator and the iguanas, with especially strange harmonica music played over the iguana scene.

That scene in particular is played for laughs, but the symbolism can be interpreted in many ways. On the BBC's 'The Review Show' one guest suggested that the reptiles were a representation of the lack of moral backbone of the characters and the back problems of Cage's character. I read them in two ways. One, similar to the review show, as a representation of the characters, through their lacking morals, having lowered themselves to more animalistic level, crawling on their bellies like the reptiles. The other interpretation I drew was that the reptiles are a symbol of Hurricane Katrina, with nature re-invading human domains (highways, Cage's desk), taking back a world that was once theirs.

Both the original and this update boast stunningly complex performances from their lead characters, a complete necessity really, with both films being essentially a character study in addiction. While Keitel's damaged Lieutenant was raw, bleak and tortured, Nicholas Cage takes the character in a different direction, mixing in humour and a truly manic quality that Cage delivers convincingly. One particular scene involves a shoot out between the drug dealers Cage has sided with and a powerful figure Cage’s character runs into trouble with. After its over, Cage orders the dealers to shoot the body again because ‘His soul is still dancing’, before he breaks into a manic, almost forced laugh. As the ‘soul’ breakdances, Cage looks on with a delirious smile, obviously seeing something the other characters cannot. It’s not just his manic edge that Cage showcase here though, he also adds many subtle physical elements to the role. Throughout the film he walks with a progressively worsening hunch due to his back, and he begins to speak more slurred as the copious drugs begin to take a hold on him. Towards the end he sometimes sounds like he’s talking with a mouthful of cotton wool.

Strange, hallucinogenic scenes like the one above, coupled with the reptile presence and the over-the-top harmonica music give the film an enjoyably quirky air. Some set-pieces are so peculiar that the most obvious reaction for the audience is to laugh, with Cage’s superbly ‘out-of-control’ performance adding to the humour. It’s a sort of mixture of crime thriller, character study and twitchy indie comedy, albeit some of the humour being jet-black. It all blends together beautifully though, producing one of the most interesting ‘re-imaginings’ in years.

Roger Holland

Movie Review Archive

UK Box Office Top Ten - weekend commencing 21/05/10

UK box office top ten and analysis for the weekend of Friday 21st - Sunday 23rd May 2010.

StreetDance 3D - the first film outside of North America to be shot on IMAX 3D - jumps straight in at number one in the UK chart in its opening weekend, leaving big budget video game adaptation and fellow new release Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time to settle for second place with almost half of the box office takings.

On one hand a five day haul of £2.49m for a newly released 3D movie could be considered disappointing (especially given the recent fascination with that extra dimension), but when said 3D movie is a product of Vertigo Films, the BBC and the UK Film Council, things start to look a little brighter. They will certainly be a lot happier than Disney as Prince of Persia just manages to beat out Robin Hood with less than ten grand the difference between second and third.

In addition to StreetDance and Persia, the top ten also welcomes another two new releases this week with Bollywood actioner Kites opening in fifth [an 'international remix' courtesy of Brett Ratner debuts this coming weekend] and Werner Herzog 're-imagining' Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call - New Orleans taking eighth.

Elsewhere in the chart, Marvel's Iron Man II slips two places to fourth, The Back-Up Plan three spots to tenth, and
A Nightmare on Elm Street and Hot Tub Time Machine plunge four apiece to seventh and eighth respectively. Enjoying a much better run of form is Chris Morris' extremist comedy Four Lions, with the Brit effort holding onto sixth for the third week in a row.

Number one this time last year: Night at the Museum 2
















































































Pos.FilmWeekend GrossWeekTotal UK Gross
1StreetDance 3D£2,493,9481£2,493,948
2Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time£1,371,0661





















































£1,371,066
3Robin Hood£1,362,3852































































£9,090,395
4Iron Man 2£523,2664































































£19,109,368
5Kites£273,9581











































































£273,958
6Four Lions
£195,8123£1,978,699
7A Nightmare on Elm Street£194,6033

























































£3,238,509
8Hot Tub Time Machine£192,6353















































































£2,558,819
9Bad Lieutenant£178,9531









































































£178,953
10The Back-Up Plan£158,4823













































































£2,038,271


Incoming...

A handful of sequels make their way onto screens this coming Friday with the big new release being chick flick Sex and the City 2 (cert. 15), which should easily claim top spot in its first weekend.

Also opening is horror Rec 2 (cert. 18) and 3D family adventure Space Chimps 2: Zartog Strikes Back (cert. PG), while those looking for something fresh can check out action adventure The Losers (cert. 12A) and family comedy The Tooth Fairy (cert. PG).

U.K. Box Office Archive

Monday, May 24, 2010

Results of our Ridley Scott poll and Blade Runner giveaway

Your favourite Ridley Scott movie is...

To coincide with our recent Ridley Scott theme here at Flickering Myth we've been asking for your favourite movie from the Brit director's extensive back catalogue. Firstly, a huge thank you to everyone who took the time to vote (431 in all, a new record!) and secondly, for those three who opted for Hannibal... WTF?? Anyway, here are the results in full:

Blade Runner (1982) 119 (27%)
Alien (1979) 107 (24%)
Gladiator (2000) 92 (21%)
Black Hawk Down (2001) 23 (5%)
American Gangster (2007) 22 (5%)
Kingdom of Heaven (2005) 19 (4%)
Black Rain (1989) 11 (2%)
The Duellists (1977) 10 (2%)
Matchstick Men (2003) 8 (1%)
Legend (1985) 7 (1%)
Body of Lies (2008) 5 (1%)
Thelma & Louise (1991) 4 (0%)
Hannibal (2001) 3 (0%)
1492: Conquest of Paradise (1992) 1 (0%)
G.I. Jane (1997) 0 (0%)
A Good Year (2006) 0 (0%)
Someone to Watch Over Me (1987) 0 (0%)
White Squall (1996) 0 (0%)

Little surprise there really with Blade Runner, Alien and Gladiator way out in front of the field but it's nice to see the underappreciated Black Rain get some support and of course, my absolute surprise that anyone out there actually managed to enjoy Hannibal.

On a final note, the lucky recipient of our latest DVD giveaway is Steven Montgomery, who bags a copy of Blade Runner: The Final Cut. Thanks to everyone who entered and check back soon for more great giveaways.

Related:

Five Essential Films of Ridley Scott
Hard to Replicate: A Ridley Scott Profile
Short Film Showcase: Boy & Bicycle (1965)
Thoughts on... Robin Hood (2010)

Sunday, May 23, 2010

Thoughts on... Cop Out (2010)

Cop Out, 2010.

Directed by Kevin Smith.
Starring Bruce Willis, Tracy Morgan, Sean William-Scott and Adam Brody.

Cop Out Kevin Smith
SYNOPSIS:

When a veteran NYPD cop's rare baseball card - his only hope to pay for his daughter's upcoming wedding - is stolen, he recruits his partner to track down the thief, a memorabilia-obsessed gangster.

Cop Out Kevin Smith
Two buddies and long-term cop partners Jimmy (Willis) and Paul (Morgan) get suspended without pay from a case after proving that their policing skills are perhaps a little too maverick for their own good. This throws Jimmy into a dilemma as he has promised to pay for his daughter’s upcoming wedding and needs to raise the money through other means before his daughters smug, cash-flashing step-father (Jason Lee) finances the wedding himself. He decides to sell a rare baseball card but his plan is immediately thwarted after the card is stolen by a loud-mouth mugger (William-Scott) and sold to a notorious Mexican gangster with a penchant for baseball memorabilia. Jimmy and Paul set out on a mission to retrieve the baseball card whilst simultaneously entangling themselves within the messy world of the gangsters they are trying to track down.

Kevin Smith usually exercises a talent of being able to combine gross out humour with funny, likeable characters and a plot that usually has some point, or at least some heart to it. Unfortunately, Cop Out seems largely devoid of any such talent. It’s the first film that Smith has directed but not written, and I think this might be the main, even if it’s not the only problem with the movie. It boisterously crashes through its storyline without giving much time for any of the events to actually mean a great deal. I’m not saying that each audience member should be desperately longing with all their heart and soul for Jimmy to get his baseball card back, but in Smith’s other films – for example his last effort Zack and Miri Make a Porno – the leads are easy to warm to and you usually find yourself rooting for them pretty quickly.

I think the absence of this in Cop Out is not only down to the heavy handed plot and largely poor dialogue but also due to the fact that the actors just aren’t doing a particularly good job, or perhaps just haven’t been directed that well. Some of the characters are cartoonish and exaggerated to a point that’s beyond humorously appropriate and just becomes irritating. It doesn't take long before you find yourself wishing that Tracy Morgan’s wacky, screechy, wise-cracking Paul was bound and gagged in a padded cell and on a heavy dose of Ritalin, instead of still bull-dozing around on the screen in front of you. And it seems as though Jason Lee only needs to have a long black moustache to twiddle between his fingers to complete his relatively unconvincing performance as the uber-conceited step-father. Other actors swing in the opposite direction and spend the film teetering on the edge of the persona they are trying to take on. Bruce Willis is supposed, I think, to be playing the slightly cooler, more cynical, but still fairly incompetent, one of the pair – but ends up impersonating a wardrobe that can occasionally fire a gun.

Despite what I’ve said so far, the film isn’t all that bad. It’s still vaguely entertaining in parts and there are one or two laughs to be had, although they aren’t exactly rib-cracking moments that will stay with you long after you’ve left the cinema. There were several occasions in the film that had the potential to be funny but were let down by lazy writing. For example; at the very beginning of the film Paul interrogates a suspect using various famous lines from well-known movies, a scene that could have been quite amusing if it weren’t for the awkward and clunky cuts to Jimmy watching behind the dark glass, who helpfully names each film for us like an IMDB robot. Later on in the film, Paul rambles on to Jimmy for a while about his bowel movements – a speech that Smith may have been able to bring some humour to if he had written it himself – but essentially just comes across as an annoying man talking annoyingly about his annoying poo.

If you literally just want to have something in front of face that fills an hour and a half then perhaps Cop Out would fit the bill, as regardless of what I’ve said I can’t really accuse it of being boring - there’s so much going on it actually manages to be fairly engaging even if only on a superficial level. However I believe that there will probably be quite a few Kevin Smith fans out there that are going to be disappointed. Hopefully next time he’ll stick to telling his own stories instead of other people's.

Amy Flinders

Movie Review Archive

Short Film Showcase - Alive in Joburg (2005)

Alive in Joburg, 2005.

Written and Directed by Neill Blomkamp.
Starring Sharlto Copley, Jason Cope, Dawie Ackermann, Braam Greyling and Godfrey Seome.

South African filmmaker Neill Blomkamp's 2005 sci-fi short Alive in Joburg would go on to inspire the director's Best Picture nominated feature District 9 (2009), and deals with the theme of apartheid through the social segregation of extraterrestrial visitors within the South African capital of Johannesburg.

Through a number of news clips and interviews we learn that the aliens arrived in huge spaceships in 1990 to escape oppression and began to spread throughout the city. Committing crimes to get by, the aliens soon clash with the police and - with tensions mounting - they are forced into living in poor conditions with the already segregated black population.


Visit the official Alive in Joburg website at Spy Films.

Click here to view more short films and public domain features.

Saturday, May 22, 2010

Thoughts on... Robin Hood (2010)

Robin Hood, 2010.

Directed by Ridley Scott.
Starring Russell Crowe, Cate Blanchett, Matthew Macfadyen, Mark Strong, William Hurt and Max von Sydow.

Robin Hood Ridley Scott
SYNOPSIS:

At the end of the 12th century, common archer Robin Hood makes his way back to England from fighting in King Richard’s crusades in France, only to become involved in another battle, this time to save England from a French invasion.

Robin Hood Russell Crowe
Ridley Scott and Russell Crowe’s latest collaboration, Robin Hood, is an interesting beast. It’s an origins story of sorts, telling of how Robin came to be known as an outlaw, yet also a historical drama, painting a picture of Britain in turmoil at the end of the 12th century. Rather than focusing solely on Russell Crowe’s hero, the film is more of an ensemble piece, taking in a large cast of characters including kings, knights, outlaws, and saboteurs.

Watching it for the first time, Robin Hood feels more complicated than it actually is – mainly because of this vast array of narratives that are all struggling for screen time. At the start of the film, Ridley Scott cuts between a group of orphan children stealing grain from the Loxley household in Nottingham (which includes Cate Blanchett’s Lady Marion and Max von Sydow’s Sir Walter), scenes setting up these characters and the people of Nottingham, King Richard’s assault on a French castle, Robin’s journey back from France, another group of Knights travelling back from France, the inept would-be-king John at odds with his mother, and a traitorous man with links to the English throne making a pact with the French King. Because of this, the film struggles to define its protagonists and develop a clear focus early on. It ends up feeling muddled and the pacing is slow, taking what seems like an age to reach a point where each character has been well enough defined to carry the plot forward.

In addition to this, Ridley Scott seems determined to not spell anything out explicitly; leaving the viewer to decipher lines of mumbled dialogue and assess what may or may not become significant later on. To an extent this work’s in Robin Hood’s favour, offering up a big summer movie that avoids the patronising hand-holding that contemporary blockbusters are often full of – Avatar is particularly guilty of this. It’s just that, at times, Robin Hood seems to need a little more focus to ensure the viewer doesn’t get lost or bored.

Despite these criticisms, when the film starts to come together (around half way in) it works really well. The multiple narrative strands begin to converge and the character building that went before gains significance. The film reaches a crescendo as Robin becomes the hero that he’s known as. In the two lengthy battle scenes that end the film, Ridley Scott really shows his flair as a director - the action is intense, exciting and brutal. A cast of hundreds of men and horses battling away on a beach, with waves crashing against the shore, is hugely impressive; a massive technical undertaking that is as exciting to watch as anything seen in the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Ridley Scott also manages to retain a real sense of time and space, something that lesser action directors often struggle with – it’s easy to recall the mess of fast editing and extreme close-ups that Michael Bay usually produces.

Robin Hood isn’t for everyone - those acclimatised to the fast pace and straightforward plots of modern blockbusters may find themselves looking at their watches. If you’re willing to put the time in though (at 140 minutes it’s a long film) you’ll find a rewarding experience that contains some spectacular action scenes and – by focusing on the years before he became an outlaw – offers a new perspective on the legend of Robin Hood.

Arnold Stone

Related:

Five Essential... Films of Ridley Scott
Hard to Replicate: A Ridley Scott Profile

Movie Review Archive

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Five Essential... Movie Sequels That Improve on the Original

To celebrate the 30th anniversary of Star Wars: Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back, Gary Collinson selects his five essential movie sequels that improve on the original…

These days if a film isn’t a remake, then there’s a pretty good chance it’s going to be a sequel. In fact, it seems to have become customary to follow a decent opening with an announcement of the follow-up (A Nightmare on Elm Street, anyone?) and all a movie has to do is pull in a few punters and the word ‘franchise’ gets the studio hearts pounding.

Now we all know it’s about the bottom line at the end of the day and sure, many of these hastily-produced sequels will see a nice return that often exceeds the original, but in terms of quality it really is a rare occasion that a second movie will add to – or god forbid, improve on – its predecessor. Ninety-nine times out of a hundred this won’t be the case, making it all the sweeter on those rare occasions when a sequel actually manages to pull it off…

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan5. Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982, dir. Nicholas Meyer)

Despite strong box office success the first feature incarnation of Gene Roddenberry’s groundbreaking sci-fi franchise is a dull and instantly forgettable affair that stumbles through a paper-thin plot at a snail’s pace. Three years later Kirk and the crew of the USS Enterprise returned to do battle with one of the greatest villains ever to grace the screen – the genetically-engineered superhuman Khan Noonien Singh (a fantastically over-the-top Ricardo Montalban) – in a sequel that outdoes the original in every way imaginable. In terms of sheer improvement, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan is head and shoulders ahead of the field. Read our review here.



The Dark Knight4. The Dark Knight (2008, dir. Christopher Nolan)

Rebooting the exhausted franchise to great effect with 2005’s Batman Begins, director Christopher Nolan laid to rest the ghost of Batman & Robin and set anticipation for a follow-up into overdrive by teasing the introduction of the Caped Crusader’s arch-nemesis, The Joker. Three years later fans got what they wanted and more as The Dark Knight transcended the typical comic book movie to deliver a sprawling crime epic that immediately cemented its place among the best of both genres. Heath Ledger’s Academy Award-winning turn as The Joker stands as a highlight but the film really is exceptional through-out from start to finish. Nolan will attempt the impossible and look to continue the trend when the third instalment hits cinemas in July 2012.


Aliens3. Aliens (1986, dir. James Cameron)

Ridley Scott's classic 1979 sci-fi horror Alien is certainly one of the best in its genre, although the ante was raised considerably with this first sequel from director James Cameron. Lead star Sigourney Weaver - who returns as heroine Ellen Ripley - once described the follow-up as having made "Alien look like a cucumber sandwich", and whereas the crew of the Nostromo had to contend with a single Xenomorph, Aliens makes fantastic use of the plural to deliver an action tour de force with a group of battle-hardened marines squaring off against a legion of the H.R. Giger-inspired creatures. Enjoying four weeks at the top of the US box office, Aliens remains the highest grossing instalment in the series (although that could change with the release of Ridley Scott's planned 3D prequels) and is one of the greatest sci-fi action films ever to grace the screen.

The Godfather Part II2. The Godfather: Part II (1974, dir. Francis Ford Coppola)

Serving as both a prequel and sequel to his 1972 mafia classic, Francis Ford Coppola's The Godfather: Part II is an epic tale presenting two parallel storylines - the founding of the Corleone crime family by a young Vito Corleone (Best Supporting Actor recipient Robert De Niro) during the 1920s and the rise to power of his son Michael (Al Pacino, with arguably his greatest performance) a generation later. Much like its predecessor, The Godfather: Part II is often referred to as one of the greatest films of all-time and was the first sequel to receive the Academy Award for Best Picture. Coppola became only the second director in history to face competition from himself in that category (with his thriller The Conversation also nominated), while he was also named Best Director after being overlooked for the original.

Star Wars - The Empire Strikes Back1. Star Wars: Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back (1980, dir. Irvin Kershner)

In this day and age the formula for a 'successful' sequel seems to be little more than a retread of the original, albeit with bigger bangs and better special effects. Not so when you're following up a pop culture phenomenon unlike anything the world had ever seen. The mastery of The Empire Strikes Back is the way it takes everything that made Star Wars so successful and turns it upside down; the big battle sequence is over in the first act and from the very beginning the Rebels are on the back foot to an enraged Sith Lord, who of course makes a startling revelation to our hero that has gone down as one of - if not the - most celebrated plot twists in history. The Empire Strikes Back is the essential sequel, and in my opinion, the greatest movie of all time.

Honourable Mentions…

Bride of Frankenstein (1935, dir. James Whale)
Dawn of the Dead (1978, dir. George A. Romero)
Evil Dead II (1987, dir. Sam Raimi)
For a Few Dollars More (1965, dir. Sergio Leone)
From Russia with Love (1963, dir. Terence Young)

And yes... I may be the only person in the world who thinks The Terminator is a better film than its 1991 follow-up, hence the reason Terminator 2: Judgement Day is absent here...

Agree? Disagree? We'd love to hear your comments on the list...

Gary Collinson

Essentials Archive

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Forthcoming Attractions: The Collector

UK release date and trailer for new horror...
The Collector
From Marcus Dunstan and Patrick Melton - the writers of Saw IV, V and VI and horror trilogy Feast - comes The Collector, described as "a real-time game of cat and mouse melding primal horror with suspense thriller".

Handyman and ex-con Arkin (Josh Stewart) sees an opportunity to repay his debts to his ex-wife when his new employer sets off on vacation leaving his country home unoccupied. Inside the house lies a jeweller’s safe housing rare gem, but unfortunately for Arkin he is unaware that a second criminal known as 'The Collector' (Juan Fernandez) has imprisoned the family and rigged the property with a series of deadly traps. With time running out, Arkin sets out to save the very family he intended to rob...

The Collector trailer:


The Collector (cert. 18) is released in UK cinemas on June 25th. Visit the official website.

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Hard to Replicate: A Ridley Scott Profile (Part 5)

Trevor Hogg profiles the career of filmmaker Ridley Scott in the final installment of a five part feature... read parts one, two, three and four.

A Good Year Ridley Scott Russell CroweReuniting with Russell Crowe (A Beautiful Mind), Ridley Scott produced A Good Year (2006). “I like to work with Russell,” said the British filmmaker, “we get on very well and that makes my job a lot easier. Some actors – you work with them once and don’t even think about working with them again. I always feel that there is an endless depth to what Russell is capable of doing in his work.” Crowe chuckled upon reading a magazine quote where Scott described their relationship. “He believes that we’re both marginally grumpy men,” recollected the notoriously cantankerous actor. “But our mood significantly lightens in each other’s company.”

“I’ve a little vineyard in Provence, and after five years I discovered that the writer Peter Mayle [A Year in Provence] was my neighbour,” explained Scott. “We started talking about my experiences and he said he would put it in a book and out of that I got the film rights.” Inheriting a chateau and vineyard in Provence, British investment banker Max Skinner (Crowe) revisits the days of his childhood and discovers romance (Marion Cotillard), a laid-back lifestyle, and a young woman (Abbie Cornish) who claims to be the illegitimate daughter of his deceased uncle (Albert Finney).

“What you see on screen in this film really is Albert [Finney],” enthused the moviemaker who has worked with the veteran actor four times, both as a director and a producer. “He’s full of joie de vivre and I couldn’t think of anybody who could play the part [of Uncle Henry Skinner] better. Freddie Highmore [Finding Neverland], who plays young Max and spent a lot of time with Albert, adored him too.” No extensive research was required for the role of Max Skinner. “There’s a lot of stuff about Max that I already knew and had already experienced,” stated Russell Crowe who is well known for getting into character through method acting. “In life’s big curve ball I’ve met guys like him. Funnily enough, when researching other films like The Insider [1999] when I had to go and find a bunch of corporate sharks, I met a lot of people who reminded me of Max.”

"I live fifteen minutes from anywhere you see in the movie,” stated the director. “The region has been a haven for me. I spent five months there making the movie.” As for what he envisioned for the movie, Ridley Scott remarked, “I wanted to make an edgy, romantic, [and] comedic story about this area.” The South Shields-native added, “I do like to make films with a political theme but sometimes it’s nice simply to make people laugh. That’s the hardest thing to do in fact. The film is fun; it’s about lightening up and enjoying life.” Reflecting further, Scott confessed, “As I’m getting older, I want to make sure every film I do really counts…I want to make films about the human condition, what we’re doing to the world or ourselves.” Unfortunately for Ridley Scott theatre audiences and movie critics did not find the picture as irresistible as a fine bottle of wine; A Good Year which cost $35 million to make grossed $42 million worldwide.

American Gangster Ridley ScottUnlike filmmakers Terry George (Hotel Rwanda) and Antoine Fuqua (The Replacement Killers) who were unable to cinematically adapt the New York Magazine article The Return of Superfly by Mark Jacobson, Scott was able to revive the project which was to star Oscar-winner Denzel Washington (Training Day). “It’s a great script about Frank Lucas who had a very successful business in Harlem in the early 1970s bringing in retail heroin from Vietnam in army transportation,” said the director who reworked the original screenplay for his seventeenth effort American Gangster (2007). “It was more about Frank Lucas and less about [New Jersey Police Detective] Richie Roberts. I felt it should be more equally balanced. But great material is great material, so when I was in the middle of Provence doing A Good Year I called [Steve] Zaillian and said, ‘What’s happening with that thing?’ It began then. I passed it on to Russell and once I had him interested I realized I could get Denzel back in.” The two Academy Award winners were familiar with each other as Russell Crowe and Denzel Washington had previously co-starred together in the science fiction thriller Virtuosity (1995).

“Tony [Scott] has always said Denzel is one of the best,” remarked the director in reference to his filmmaking younger brother who has consistently worked with Washington. “He’s a method actor who absolutely gets into his role.” Ridley Scott added, “I think being a method actor just means you do your homework and go deeper into the character.” Denzel Washington is well versed in the personal history of Frank Lucas. “From a very early age he began to steal and he worked his way up the line,” began Washington. “He came to New York and the most notorious gangster in Harlem [Bumpy Johnson] recognized the talent, if you will, in this young kid, and continued to train him. He was on the wrong side of the tracks, but he was a brilliant student, and became a master of the business he was in.” Asked about his opinion of Lucas, the actor replied, “It’s not for me to judge him. Basically, Frank’s a human being who’s done some awful things and paid the price for it.”

Speaking about Richie Roberts who defended Lucas as a criminal defense attorney, Crowe remarked, “I think Richie is a great patriot because he went into the Marines Corps, and it wasn’t quite what he thought it would be. So he went into the police force, and it wasn’t quite what he thought it would be. Then he worked his ass off and became a lawyer, and then a prosecutor. And he was like, this doesn’t satisfy me either. So I’ll do this thing that I know you’re allowed to do in America. I’ll stand here, and I’ll be an advocate for somebody who has no defense.”

“If I’m excited, it tends to leak out,” stated Ridley Scott. “I think that’s what I’m good at – I’m good at pushing the pace and suddenly everybody is running. It is very easy to do only ten shots a day. On American Gangster, we were doing fifty set-ups a day. We wouldn’t have got through it otherwise. I’d have to do two takes and say, ‘That’s it.’ Denzel or Russell would go, ‘Once more,’ and I’d say, ‘Okay, let’s go.’ It’s faster to go again than talk about it.” Commenting on Crowe’s attitude towards the high-pace filmmaking environment, the veteran moviemaker said, “I think he loves the fact that I move really fast and that I know what I’m going to do before I’m there.” Other actors in the picture include Chiwetel Ejiofer (Dirty Pretty Things), Josh Brolin (Mimic), Ted Levine (The Silence of the Lambs), Carla Gugino (Snake Eyes), Armand Assante (Q & A), Cuba Gooding Jr. (Jerry Maguire), and Rudy Dee (Do the Right Thing).

American Gangster easily recouped its $100 million production budget earning $266 million worldwide. The picture was an Oscar contender for Best Art Direction and Best Supporting Actress (Rudy Dee); and received BAFTA nominations for Best Cinematography, Best Editing, Best Film, Best Music, and Best Original Screenplay. At the Golden Globes, the movie was up for Best Director, Best Picture – Drama, and Best Actor (Denzel Washington).

Body of Lies Ridley ScottA thriller written by author David Ignatious about CIA operative Roger Ferris (Leonardo DiCaprio) who hunts down an Islamic terrorist leader operating in Jordan required a name change to Body of Lies (2008). “I quite liked the title Penetration, but that’ll be confusing,” admitted Ridley Scott. “Everyone sniggers when you say it. The film is about where we are today in the Middle East and the crossroads of politics and intelligence.” Expressing his view of Ferris, DiCaprio stated, “I saw my character as an operative in the Middle East who was trying to do his job in a higher moral context than his boss [played by Russell Crowe] wanted him to.” Ignatious was impressed with the cinematic personas of Roger Ferris and his manipulative CIA handler Ed Hoffman. “They obviously re-imagined the characters in a hundred different ways, and that’s now who these people are,” said the novelist. “I’ll never be able to read the book and read about Hoffman and not think about Russell, and the same thing with Ferris and Leo.”

“Inevitably, the screenplay had to cut a lot of material to make a two hour movie out of a three hundred and fifty page book,” realized David Ignatious. “But the screenwriter, Bill Monahan [The Departed], found a way to draw a straight storyline through my material and I think all of the main themes of the book are captured well in the film. I am really happy with the way it turned out.” One of the significant changes was in the ethnicity of Ferris’ love interest. “The book started off with Aisha [Golshifteh Farahani] being a national,” said Ridley Scott. “In fact, she was a French girl in the embassy. I asked David how he’d feel if she was local.” The revision to the story was a wise one. “It started to underscore Ferris’ attachment and liking for the region that he was in.” Despite the alterations, David Ignatious was satisfied with the end result. “Something I’m really happy about is how faithful the movie is to the book,” observed Ignatious, “both in the interaction of the characters, [and] in its picture of the CIA struggling around the world against a very difficult adversary.”

Leonardo DiCaprio (Shutter Island) had previously co-starred with Russell Crowe in The Quick and the Dead (1995); however, he was embarking into unfamiliar territory having never worked with Ridley Scott. “The pace in which he shoots is really intense, really fast paced, and you have to be prepared for anything in any given moment,” marveled DiCaprio. “He literally has helicopters on standby circling around, ready to get an overhead shot of you running through an entire city.” The actor could not help but be impressed by the director whom he refers to as “a human editing bay.” “It’s amazing to watch him behind the monitor or in the tent with six different monitors and cameras from every different angle and he’s just snapping from monitor to monitor, switching and knowing exactly…and really efficiently saying, ‘This is exactly what I’m going to use in the movie and everything else is a profound waste of time.’” Scott’s professionalism contributed significantly to Leonardo DiCaprio’s confidence in the project. “You go in every day and feel like you’ve done a day’s work and everything that you put effort into will wind up for the most part as a part of the movie.” Costing $70 million to produce, Body of Lies grossed $115 million at the worldwide box office.

RRobin Hood Russell Crowe Ridley Scotte-imagining an English folktale resulted in Ridley Scott tackling a cinematic staple – the legend of Robin Hood (2010). “I think there’s been eighty [versions] made over the years and it’s the kind of thing I used to enjoy as a kid, but when I revisit them, they’re not very good,” revealed the British filmmaker. “Everyone sniggered because I was going to do a sandal and toga movie. But I knew exactly how to do it and I know how to make Robin Hood. You step back and make it real for a start.” Initially Russell Crowe was to play both the title character and the villainous Sheriff of Nottingham but the plan was abandoned. Screenwriter Brian Helgeland (L.A. Confidential) stated, “The whole thing was to try to strip away the goofiness of Robin Hood. What I tried to do was make it feel like this is a real story and the myth rose out of this, rather than seeing the myth. He’s not quite running around, robbing the rich and giving to the poor, but you can see how it evolved into that.” Helgeland acknowledged that knowing ahead of time that Crowe was playing the role assisted him with his writing. “Everyone has their strengths. Johnny Depp [Alice in Wonderland] as Robin Hood would be a different Robin Hood than Russell Crowe as Robin Hood. With respect to them both, they do different things well. So, knowing who it is helps a lot.”

A significant modification to the tale results in the major adversary being not the Sheriff of Nottingham but the country of France. “I play a traitor who basically is trying to stir up enough trouble to create Civil War so that he can encourage the French to land and consequently achieve power,” said actor Mark Strong (Sherlock Holmes) who plays the fictional character of Sir Godfrey. “[For] the final battle scene we were on the beach in Wales for two weeks…We had 72 trailers, 1500 people [to be catered for] lunch, 500 extras, 120 horses and stunt riders, as well as that there were an extra 200 stuntmen. There were 8 boats landing in the surf. A helicopter. 15 cameras. It was just amazing. So it was old-school filmmaking of the first order and in the middle of that was Ridley, like a general conducting his troops.”

The $155 million Hollywood production is already being compared to the picture which was Crowe’s and Scott’s original collaboration. “It doesn’t matter what we do, everybody always compares it to Gladiator [2000],” concedes Russell Crowe. “We do a little comedy set in the south of France [A Good Year] and half of the reviews had references to Gladiator. We do American Gangster and Body of Lies and there’s Gladiator references, so you’re not going to win either way once you’ve made a movie like that. It’s ten years old and it still gets played on primetime television; it’s just one of those films you have once in a career if you’re really, really lucky.”

Robin Hood Russell Crowe Cate Blanchett Ridley ScottCast in Robin Hood are Max von Sydow (Snow Falling on Cedars), Cate Blanchett (I’m Not There), Danny Huston (The Constant Gardener), Matthew Macfadyen (In My Father’s Den), Kevin Durand (Legion), and William Hurt (One True Thing). Ridley Scott is open to the possibility of returning to Sherwood Forest. “Why not have a potential for a sequel, particularly if it is a genre that you absolutely love and has never been fully explored?” asked the director. “If there were to be a sequel to Robin Hood, you would have a constant enemy throughout, King John, and you would follow his reign of seventeen years, and the signing of Magna Carta could be Robin’s final act.”

“Eventually, you come up against the marketplace,” declared Scott. “The reality is that filmmaking is an increasingly expensive proposition and while I’m not saying you should trade what you feel are legitimate concerns for an increased box office, you do have to keep in mind that what you’re involved in is a business, as well as a creative enterprise.” The director clarified his remark, “If you’re going to end up in an art cinema you should stay within the confines of a small budget movie, which will allow you to explore most any esoteric idea you wish. But if you’re going to attempt to follow the path of a [Steven] Spielberg, then your choice of subject matter and the way you’re going to explain and communicate your story to that larger audience is, of necessity, going to be on a slightly more simplified level.”

Future projects for Ridley Scott include a two-part prequel to Alien (1979) and a cinematic adaptation of the crime-thriller novel The Kind One by Tom Epperson about an amnesic who falls in love with a violent mobster’s girlfriend in 1930s Los Angeles. On the subject of directing, Scott declared, “A film has to have a guiding mind, otherwise I think it flounders. Of course it is a team effort, but in the final analysis it should cohere round one person.” Life behind the camera is not easy. “You are expected to be an expert on sound, cameras, wristwatches, shoes, contact lenses, lighting, casting, you name it. When you’re making a film, everyone asks you every conceivable question all the time, because you’re the conduit which everything goes [through].”

Pondering what fascinates him as a filmmaker, Ridley Scott concluded, “Because I’m European, because I think I have one foot halfway into the truth behind documentaries and non-mainstream movies, I can’t quite shake that mud off my feet. Some people call it perversity. It’s not perversity. Life isn’t a bed of roses. People die. People get cancer. And therefore one is always reminding the audience that there’s a dark side to life. That attracts me because it’s the truth.”

Watch the Robin Hood trailer and visit the film's official website.

For more on Ridley Scott visit RSA Films, or check out The Ridley Scott Fan Information Page.

Five Essential Films of Ridley Scott
DVD Giveaway - Blade Runner: The Final Cut

The profile has also been republished as part of the Ridley Scott blogathon at Seeti Maar - Diary of a Movie Lover.

Trevor Hogg is a freelance video editor and writer who currently resides in Canada.