
Contemplating what attracted the Academy Award-winning director to do a cinematic adaptation scheduled to be released in 2013, Wilson speculates, “There is a chapter where Marcus and Dawn are in their apartment in New York City and the Zero Hour has happened. A lot of people are leaving the city and trying to make it to the country where the robots aren’t as well adapted. They’re hanging out and staying in the city; they see that robots are basically going door to door, going inside apartment buildings and coming out with body bags. I think a lot of that evoked some World War II imagery; that might have been something that interested Spielberg.”
As for how Archos would compare to the iconic computer antagonist in 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968), Daniel H. Wilson jokes, “I think the way you compete with HAL is that you have Steven Spielberg make a movie out of your book.” The Portland, Oregon based writer has been consulted by the production team and has been shown some of the conceptual artwork. “We just talked about robots in general and how the feel of this is so realistic and gritty, and the veracity that supports the book and will support the movie.” Asked if he is serving as a technical advisor on the picture, Wilson replies, “I’m not in any official capacity. In retrospect I probably should have tried to get that in the contract. So they’re not obligated to communicate with me at all and I really appreciate anytime they do reach out. I think that’s really great and I’m happy to help.” Contemplating how the evolving technology will be presented cinematically, Wilson states, “I imagine that on the scale of what we’re talking about there will be a lot of computer generated effects because how do you create a thousand stumpers [walnut-sized robots]? That’s just me, I’m not a filmmaker.”

The author acknowledges comparisons will be made to a movie helmed by Alex Proyas (Dark City). “In terms of being similar to I, Robot [2004] I don’t see that,” remarks Daniel H. Wilson. “The robot uprising in I, Robot I feel it is hard to relate to. It’s just a bunch of translucent humanoids going crazy, whereas Robopocalypse is going to have a much more grounded feel. This is literally when you get in your car, you start it and it just locks the doors and drives you over a bridge. Or when you get a cellphone call from your father telling you to meet him somewhere but it’s not really your father, and when you get there it is just a bunch of people being massacred.” Another distinct difference exists. “I felt like the protagonist in I, Robot didn’t like robots; he was really anti-technology and part of the theme of the movie was anti-technology. I definitely don’t see that in the book because I love technology and if you read Robopocalypse you’ll see that it’s more complicated than that. It’s just not like bad robots kill good humans. You read it and you realize that the machines in this world are sentient and are fighting for a place to exist alongside humans.”

Many thanks to Daniel H. Wilson for taking the time out of his busy schedule for this interview.
For more on the author, follow Daniel on Twitter and visit his website.
Read Trevor's review of Robopocalypse, along with the first part of this interview, Novel Thoughts: A conversation with author Daniel H. Wilson.
Trevor Hogg is a freelance video editor and writer who currently resides in Canada.
No comments:
Post a Comment